Notes on Gender Responsive Approaches to Female Offending
Introduction to Gender-Responsive Approaches
The gender-responsive (GR) approach addresses the unique needs of female offenders in correctional systems.
This approach has gained traction due to increasing female imprisonment rates in the US and England.
Key Findings from the Article
Effectiveness of GR Tools: Mixed findings on the effectiveness of GR assessment tools, often emphasizing trauma and mental health.
Pathways Literature: Historical context suggests the GR framework is heavily based on pathways literature, which may not fully capture the complexities of female offending.
Gender Overview in Offending
Women have historically been viewed as a small, distinct group requiring a differentiated approach in policy-making.
Increase in female prison populations has prompted a re-evaluation of correctional practices.
Pathways to Offending
Originated with Kathy Daly's research, which identified five pathways for female offenders:
Harmed and harming pathway involves those abused in childhood leading to later substance abuse.
Recent studies emphasize that factors like relationships and finances may drive offending more than trauma and mental health issues.
Critique of Current Assessments
Existing assessments like the Level of Service Inventory-Revised (LSI-R) prioritize traditional male-centric risk factors and may overlook specific female needs.
Critics argue that GR tools reinforce stereotypes by focusing excessively on trauma rather than addressing substance abuse, financial issues, and relational troubles.
Comparison of Early vs. Late Onset of Offending
Studies indicate that many female offenders begin offending later in life, contrasting with male offenders who often start earlier.
Risk Factors by Onset Age:
Early onset offenders typically have more childhood risk factors (e.g., abuse).
Late onset offenders, while having stable childhoods, may begin offending due to later life stresses and victimization.
Common Risk Factors Across Genders
Many risk factors are comparable across genders: substance abuse, financial issues, and problematic relationships.
Certain interventions focusing on these areas—such as financial literacy programs—might better serve female ex-offenders post-release.
Recommendations for Future Policy and Programs
Programs must evolve to address proximal causes of female offending, focusing on:
Developing coping strategies for financial and relational challenges.
Adjusting correctional approaches to consider women’s specific life circumstances rather than relying solely on trauma histories.
Interventions should include practical skills, emotional support, and rehabilitation resources relevant to women’s unique experiences.
Conclusion and Implications
The GR movement has emphasized understanding women’s offenses through the lens of their experiences, but it risks neglecting other influential societal factors.
Policymakers are encouraged to broaden their focus beyond gender stereotypes to ensure the effectiveness and relevance of programmatic responses to female offending.