Law of One Price: This principle underlies Purchasing Power Parity (PPP).
Arbitrage: Exploiting price differences for the same good in different markets to make a profit.
The Big Mac Index
Origin: Invented by The Economist in 1986.
Purpose: To serve as a lighthearted guide to assess whether currencies are at their "correct" level.
Foundation: Based on the theory of Purchasing Power Parity (PPP).
PPP suggests that in the long run, exchange rates should move toward the rate that equalizes the prices of an identical basket of goods and services between two countries (in this case, a Big Mac).
How it Works
PPP Implication: Exchange rates are determined by the value of goods that currencies can purchase.
Price Differences: Differences in local prices (Big Macs) can indicate what the exchange rate should be.
Valuation: The index estimates how much a currency is undervalued or overvalued relative to another.
Big Mac Exchange Rate Example
Big Mac Price: $5 in the US, 20 yuan in China.
Implied Exchange Rate: 1:4 (1 dollar for 4 yuan).
Actual Exchange Rate: $1 = 6.4 yuan.
Valuation: Yuan is 38% undervalued.
Limitations
Not Precise: Burgernomics is not intended as a precise measure of currency misalignment.
Purpose: It's a tool to make exchange-rate theory more understandable.
Global Standard
Recognition: The Big Mac Index has become a global standard.
Inclusion: It is included in economic textbooks and has been the subject of many academic studies.
Gourmet Version: A gourmet version of the index is calculated for 55 countries plus the euro area.
Euro Area Example (January 2025)
Big Mac Cost: €5.67 in the Euro area, US$5.79 in the United States.
Implied Exchange Rate: \frac{5.67}{5.79} = 0.98
Actual Exchange Rate: 0.95.
Valuation: The euro is 2.8% overvalued.
\frac{0.98 - 0.95}{0.95} \approx 0.028 = 2.8\%
Japanese Yen Example (January 2025)
Big Mac Cost: ¥480 in Japan, US$5.79 in the United States.
Over/Under Valuation by Country (as of January 2025)
Switzerland: 38.0% overvalued
Argentina: 20.1% overvalued
Uruguay: 19.3% overvalued
Norway: 15.3% overvalued
Euro area: 2.8% overvalued
Costa Rica: 1.9% overvalued
United States: Baseline (0%)
Britain: -1.1% undervalued
Sweden: -2.1% undervalued
Denmark: -5.2% undervalued
Canada: -6.2% undervalued
Lebanon: -7.4% undervalued
Turkey: -8.2% undervalued
Poland: -10.0% undervalued
Colombia: -10.6% undervalued
Singapore: -10.7% undervalued
Saudi Arabia: -12.5% undervalued
United Arab Emirates: -15.4% undervalued
Australia: -15.9% undervalued
New Zealand: -17.5% undervalued
Israel: -18.6% undervalued
Mexico: -20.5% undervalued
Czech Republic: -21.2% undervalued
Chile: -21.5% undervalued
Kuwait: -21.5% undervalued
Peru: -21.8% undervalued
Bahrain: -22.1% undervalued
Nicaragua: -22.7% undervalued
Venezuela: -23.1% undervalued
Honduras: -28.8% undervalued
Qatar: -28.8% undervalued
Brazil: -30.5% undervalued
Guatemala: -30.7% undervalued
Thailand: -30.8% undervalued
Oman: -31.4% undervalued
South Korea: -33.6% undervalued
Pakistan: -35.0% undervalued
Azerbaijan: -36.6% undervalued
Hungary: -37.0% undervalued
Jordan: -39.1% undervalued
Moldova: -39.2% undervalued
China: -39.2% undervalued
Romania: -40.8% undervalued
Japan: -46.3% undervalued
Hong Kong: -46.8% undervalued
Vietnam: -47.7% undervalued
Malaysia: -48.1% undervalued
Philippines: -50.1% undervalued
Ukraine: -50.7% undervalued
South Africa: -52.0% undervalued
Egypt: -53.6% undervalued
India: -54.8% undervalued
Indonesia: -56.2% undervalued
Taiwan: -58.8% undervalued
Real Exchange Rates
Further analysis and discussion on real exchange rates are expected to follow. This topic will delve deeper into factors affecting currency valuation beyond simple price comparisons.