Societal Responses to Deviance/Criminality - Notes (edited)

Natural Rights & the Social Contract
  • focus shifts from causes of deviance to how society reacts to deviance, emphasizing the importance of social norms and laws in regulating behavior.

  • The social contract is the idea that individuals consent to give up certain freedoms in exchange for protection and order provided by the state. it is about cooperation

  • Balancing individual rights with the common good (cam from philosophers Jhon lock, Jhon Stuart Will, and Bentham)

  • Rousseau emphasized the "general will" and said “men are born free yet everwhere they are in chains”—the collective interest of the people—and argued that true freedom is found in obedience to laws one gives oneself.

  • These ideas remain relevant in modern debates about state power and individual freedom.

Example: The Freemen on the Land movement is individuals who believe they are sovereign citizens. In Canada, especially in B.C., they reject government authority and law based on misinterpretations of the social contract. The Canadian legal system views this as a threat to lawful governance. Estimated 30,000+ Canadians identify with this movement. E.g. the case of needs vs. needs (divorce with the husband being Freemen)

Forms of Social Control
  • Formal: legal & institutional (Laws, policing, courts, incarceration)

  • Informal: social reactions (Norms, peer pressure, values, community judgment, family disapproval)

  • these controls often affect the poor and minorities more severely

  • Example: Prison abolition spectrum, B.C. decriminalizing drugs.

  • Health Canada exemption: Minor drug possession not charged.

Medicalization of Deviant Behavior
  • medicalization: Non-medical issues become/are treated as medical (addiction, ADHD).

  • May reduce punishment but also stigmatize or disempower individuals and cause lack of self-trust or dependence on systems

  • Example: Daphne Scholinski’s institutionalization for not acting “appropriately female.”

  • Demedicalization: When behavior is no longer viewed as a medical issue (homosexuality)

  • NCR verdicts: offenders have annual review and can be given absolute discharge, conditional discharge, or detention

Incarceration & Supervision
  • Policing and surveillance affects marginalized groups.

  • Goffman: constant surveillance makes everyday spaces risky locations for “wanted” men.

    • Total institutions: all life activities in one location under strict control (e.g. prisons, mental hospitals, etc.,) lead to “institutionalization” (loss of independence) as well as a hard transition back into the community

  • Beckett & Herbert: city laws “banish” people from certain areas

  • Todd Clear: incarceration destabilizes communities, creating “prison places”

  • Michelle Alexander: mass incarceration is the “new Jim Crow”

  • Gresham Sykes' 5 pains of imprisonment: Loss of liberty, goods/services, heterosexual relationships, autonomy, security.

Sentencing & Punishment
  • Hagan's 7 purposes of punishment: restraint/Incapacitation, individual/specific deterrence, general deterrence, reform/rehabilitation, moral affirmation/symbolism, retribution, restitution/compensation.

  • Canadian Criminal Code purpose and principles of sentencing:

    • the purpose of sentencing is to foster respect for the law and maintain a just, peaceful, and safe society.

    • objectives: Denounce unlawful conduct, deter crime, protect society through separation, rehabilitate and reintegrate offenders, encourage offender accountability, and to provide reparations for harm done to victims/community.

  • Sentencing Options: imprisonment, intermittent sentence, conditional sentence, probation, conditional discharge, absolute discharge, fines, restitution, restorative justice, community service, or community-based sanctions.

    Juvenile Facilities
    • aim more at rehabilitation but still expose youth to incarceration’s harm

    • shift away from housing noncriminal youth in these facilities (due to labeling)

    • youth often return to adult prisons if reoffending

Reentry & Collateral Consequences
  • Reentry to society is hard: there is stigma and barriers in employment, housing, voting, education, and parenting.

  • Families suffer long-term impacts: instability, poverty, poor health, and at-risk kids.

  • one of the highest rates of suicide is among former offenders released back into the community

  • Devah Pager: race and criminal record reduce job callbacks and white ex-offenders received more call backs than black

  • Felon disenfranchisement: when voting rights are lost for felons. It affects millions, especially Black communities.

Sex offenders and public fear
  • harshest controls: registration, residency restriction, civil commitment after sentence

  • often face indefinite punishment and societal exclusion

impacts on families and communities
  • incarceration affects: children (~1.5M with parent in prison), women visitors (secondary prisonization), community support networks

  • Meagan comfort: visitors help keep incarcerated men connected to family life

International comparison
  • Norway: Humane, rehabilitative, and normalized prisons

  • Latin America: overcrowded, unsafe, self-governed prisons

  • US: one of the highest incarceration rates in the world

Class and justice: pay to stay vs. mental illness
  • wealthy inmates can pay for cleaner, safer jails

  • poor, mentally ill often cycle through jail without adequate treatment or support

Prison college programs
  • proven to reduce recidivism and aid rehabilitation

  • examples: Bard Prison Initiative, Inside-Out program, San Quentin, Bedford Hills

What Works?
  • Education/rehab reduce recidivism.

  • Community-based alternatives and restorative justice promote reintegration

  • Support services post-release are critical for long-term success.