Health Informatics and Evidence-based Practice
The Efficacy - Effectiveness Gap
The lecture discusses the gap between efficacy and effectiveness in medical treatments.
Efficacy: The power or ability to produce an effect, best tested using randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Effectiveness: The degree to which something successfully produces a desired result, best tested in 'real-world' trials.
Efficacy-Effectiveness Gap: Differences in outcomes between patients treated in RCTs (ideal conditions) and those in real-world settings (messy conditions).
Limits of Randomized Controlled Trials
RCTs are experiments designed to reduce bias when testing treatment efficacy.
They involve:
- Random allocation of subjects to groups.
- Different treatments, with comparison of responses.
- An experimental group receiving the intervention (e.g., a drug).
- A control group receiving an alternative (e.g., a placebo).
- Monitoring the groups to determine the efficacy of the experiment.
Strengths of RCTs:
- Accurate, unbiased measurement of treatment effect.
- High degree of internal validity.
- Strict eligibility criteria leading to a homogenous study population.
- Reduced inter-patient variability.
Limits of RCTs:
- Suboptimal representation of real-world patients, especially those with advanced age or greater comorbidities.
Real World Trials
Alternative to RCTs.
Employ less restrictive recruitment criteria to ensure representation of individuals with previously ineligible characteristics.
Achieving Implementation of Evidence
Implementation Science: The study of methods for integrating research and evidence-based interventions into routine clinical practice.
Research funders are increasingly interested in seeing successful treatments implemented without delay.
Key aspects for successful implementation:
- Being prepared.
- Communicating effectively.
- Ensuring required resources are available.
- Enlisting needed help.
- Using resources efficiently.
Antibiotics and Implementation Challenges
Context: Prescribing of antibiotics, particularly for respiratory infections.
Issues:
- Questionable effectiveness in respiratory infections.
- Association with increasing bacterial resistance.
- Associated with preventable deaths in hospital, can be costly, and has side effects.
Example Study: Amoxicillin for acute lower-respiratory-tract infection in primary care.
- A 12-country, randomised, placebo-controlled trial published in The Lancet (2013).
- DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70300-6
- Conclusion: Amoxicillin provides little benefit for acute lower-respiratory-tract infection in primary care when pneumonia is not suspected clinically and may cause slight harms.
BMJ Open Study: Serious bacterial infections and antibiotic prescribing in primary care.
- Conclusion: No population-level evidence that family practices with lower total antibiotic prescribing might have more frequent occurrence of serious bacterial infections overall.
- Improving the recording of infection episodes could inform better antimicrobial stewardship in primary care.
Areas of Implementation
Individual clinician (investigation, prescribing, non-drug interventions).
Local groups (hospital teams, general practices, community teams).
Professional groups (paediatricians, infectious disease clinicians, public health clinicians).
Organisation.
Region.
Society.
Facilitators and Obstacles to Implementation
Facilitators:
- Experienced leadership.
- Detailed planning.
- Team engagement.
- Prioritisation.
- Provision of required resources.
Obstacles:
- Lack of commitment by management.
- Disorganised work culture.
- Poor readiness to change.
- Poor team structure.
Implementation Challenges
Implementing research evidence to improve health outcomes.
Preventing harm from discredited treatments by implementing research evidence against them.