Mexican War and Its Aftermath
Context of the Mexican-American War
The Mexican-American War (1846-1848) concluded with the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, fundamentally altering the United States' geopolitical landscape.
While the war was a military success, it sparked deep internal divisions, particularly along sectional lines (North vs. South).
Opposition to the Mexican War
Key Observations and Political Friction
Opposition was minimal in Texas and the Deep South, where the war was seen as a vehicle for territorial expansion and the protection of Southern interests.
In the North, the Whig Party and "Conscience Whigs" provided significant pushback. Notably, a young Abraham Lincoln issued the "Spot Resolutions," questioning the exact location where American blood was shed to justify the war.
Specific Groups and IDEOLOGICAL Opposition
Abolitionists: Figures like William Lloyd Garrison viewed the war as a "pro-slavery conspiracy" to expand the institution into new latitudes.
Henry David Thoreau: In protest of the war and slavery, Thoreau refused to pay his poll tax and was jailed, leading him to write Civil Disobedience.
The Wilmot Proviso (1846): Representative David Wilmot proposed that slavery be prohibited in any territory acquired from Mexico. Although it passed the House multiple times, it failed in the Senate, highlighting the growing sectional chasm.
Geographical and Political Consequences of the War
The Mexican Cession
The U.S. acquired approximately 525,000 square miles of land, an increase of roughly 20\% of its total size.
Territories gained include present-day California, Nevada, Utah, and Arizona, along with parts of Colorado, New Mexico, and Wyoming.
In exchange, the U.S. paid Mexico $15 million and assumed $3.25 million in debt claims by U.S. citizens against Mexico.
Themes of Migration and Politics
Civil War Connections: The acquisition of these lands forced the federal government to address the status of slavery in the territories, a question the Founders had largely deferred. This "Pandora's Box" of territorial slavery led directly to the political breakdowns of the 1850s.
Missouri Compromise Significance: The 36^{\circ}30' line established in 1820 was now challenged by the new western acquisitions, as much of the Mexican Cession fell south of that line, yet California sought admission as a free state.
Group Dynamics and Reactions
Expansionist Sentiment: The concept of Manifest Destiny reached its peak, with many Southerners believing that the expansion of slavery was a constitutional right.
Shift in Activism:
Literature such as Harriet Beecher Stowe’s Uncle Tom's Cabin (1852) transformed the slavery debate from a political/economic issue into a profound moral crisis for many Northerners.
The Underground Railroad increased its activity, symbolizing the North's growing defiance of federal pro-slavery laws.
Sectional Tensions and Economic Factors
Northern Democrats and the Free Soil Movement
The Free Soil Party (1848) campaigned on the slogan "Free Soil, Free Speech, Free Labor, and Free Men."
Their primary goal was not necessarily the abolition of slavery where it already existed, but preventing its expansion to protect the economic interests of white laborers who could not compete with slave labor.
Southern Constitutional Defense
Southern leaders like John C. Calhoun argued that slaves were property protected by the Fifth Amendment.
They asserted that the federal government had no authority to restrict property rights in common territories, suggesting that any restriction was unconstitutional.
Popular Sovereignty and Its Flaws
Concept Proposed by Lewis Cass and Stephen Douglas:
This doctrine suggested that the actual settlers of a territory should decide by vote whether to allow slavery.
While it seemed democratic, it resulted in "Bleeding Kansas," where rival governments (pro-slavery and anti-slavery) engaged in violent conflict to influence the outcome.
Election of 1848 and Fragmentation of Parties
Political Shift: The election saw the rise of the Free Soil Party, headed by former President Martin Van Buren, which pulled enough votes from the Democrats to help the Whig candidate, Zachary Taylor, win.
Whig Fragility: Taylor, a Mexican War hero and slave owner, did not have a clear platform on the expansion of slavery, which further frustrated party members on both sides.
California Gold Rush (1849)
Rapid Population Growth: The discovery of gold at Sutter's Mill led to a massive influx of "Forty-Niners." California’s population soared from 14,000 to over 100,000 in less than two years.
Demand for Statehood: The chaos of the mining camps necessitated a formal government. California drafted a constitution that prohibited slavery and applied for statehood in 1849, bypassing the territorial phase and outraging Southern politicians who wanted the state split in two.
Compromise of 1850
Legislative Response: Orchestrated by Henry Clay ("The Great Compromiser") and later pushed through by Stephen Douglas, the compromise consisted of five key parts:
California admitted as a free state.
Utah and New Mexico territories organized with popular sovereignty.
Texas boundary dispute settled; Texas received $10 million for yielding claims to New Mexico.
Slave trade (but not slavery itself) abolished in Washington, D.C.
Fugitive Slave Act of 1850: A much harsher law that required Northerners to assist in the capture of runaway slaves, which radicalized Northern opinion against the South.
Conclusions
The Mexican-American War acted as the catalyst for the ultimate breakdown of the Second Party System. By shifting the national focus to the expansion of slavery, it made compromise increasingly difficult, setting the nation on an inevitable path toward the Civil War in 1861.