ST

Marketing for a Non-Profit Organization - Notes

Marketing for Non-Profit Organizations

Introduction

  • Non-profit organizations (NPOs) primarily sell their mission, ideas, programs, and services rather than tangible products.
  • Community awareness is vital; without it, fundraising efforts are unlikely to succeed.
  • A strong image enhances community awareness, leading to increased local support through effective marketing.
  • This paper examines the marketing practices of WWF (World Wide Fund for Nature) in Greece, specifically focusing on their program for protecting endangered animals.

Literature Review

  • NPOs operate in a competitive environment with financial and manpower constraints.
  • Yorke (2007) notes that NPOs relate to many "publics".
  • Gallagher and Weinberg (1991) state that NPOs have:
    • Non-financial objectives.
    • Mission-driven focus.
    • Multiple "customers."
    • Cooperative-competitive relationships with competitors.
  • Bruce (1995) adds that NPOs have multiple stakeholders: staff, beneficiaries, board members, union representatives, which makes ascertaining success difficult and may lead to disregard of marketing.
  • Krashinsky (1997) notes stakeholder conflicts require resolution mechanisms.
  • Yorke (2007) mentions manipulation of the marketing mix is difficult; price is often not an instrument for influencing consumer behavior.
  • Kotler and Levy (1969) emphasize marketing's crucial role in NPOs, whether acknowledged or not.
  • Andreasen and Kotler (2003) highlight the increasing application of marketing principles to boost income for NPOs.
  • Bulla (2006) says NPOs agree customer profiling/segmentation is helpful, but don't implement it.
  • Akchin (2001) found a trend toward performing marketing functions without a comprehensive strategy in USA NPOs.
  • Dolnicar and Lazarevski (2009) found that many NPOs lack understanding of marketing principles, focusing on sales and promotions and few marketing staff are trained in marketing.
  • Reasons for this:
    • Marketing mix elements are not fully controlled.
    • Product (mission) is inflexible.
    • Price is often voluntary.
    • Distribution channel decisions are limited.
    • Reluctance to adopt marketing perceiving it as manipulative, conflicting with their honorable work.
  • Maynard (2008) advises NPOs to develop a strong identity, viewing marketing as a philosophy of action.
  • Lake (2008) emphasizes marketing is more than sales or donations; it satisfies consumer/donor needs.
  • Shapiro (1981) and Ojiambo (1994) recommend NPOs cultivate distinctive competencies.
  • Andreasen and Kotler (2003) recommend a customer-centered mindset through market research.
  • Susan (2005) explores how marketing extracts benefits from philanthropy.
  • Traditional marketing promotes NPO missions and raises awareness.
  • Dolnicar and Lazarevski (2009) suggest other marketing strategies:
    • Market segmentation.
    • Product positioning.
    • Targeted advertising.
    • Channel selection.
  • Maynard (2008), Lake (2008), and Ojiambo (1994) agree segmentation is crucial for sustainability and consistent communication.
  • Lake (2008) advises maintaining customer databases for targeted communications.
  • Yorke (2007) notes budget constraints limit primary data use for segmentation; secondary data is scarce.
  • Shapiro (1981) re-categorizes the marketing mix for NPOs as advertising and product policies.
  • Maynard (2008) and Yorke (2007) propose promotion via:
    • Phone calls.
    • Letters.
    • Email.
    • Newsletters.
    • Reports.
    • Signs.
    • Press releases.
    • Editorials.
    • Brochures.
  • Marketing materials should describe:
    • Benefits.
    • Services.
    • Donation opportunities.
    • Organizational values.
  • Lake (2008) advises a professional website for information, news, community building, and showcasing benefits.
  • Maynard (2008) suggests slogans for effective messaging.
  • Message repetition and variation enhance memorability.
  • Yorke (2007) notes diverse target markets hinder message effectiveness; messages may lack detail and fail to emphasize personal benefits.
  • Lake (2008) suggests alliances with other organizations, commerce, government, advertising media, and business.

Research Methodology

  • Case study approach is employed, focusing on a specific setting or event (Stake 1995).

Sampling Method

  • Purposeful sampling is used to select information-rich cases (Patton, 1990; Cresswell 1998).
  • Two types of purposeful sampling:
    • Snowball sampling: identifying others to investigate (Minichiello et al., 1990).
    • Maximum variation sampling: picking cases purposefully (Minichiello et al., 1990).
  • The General Manager suggested five more people in the organization from different departments.
  • Six in-depth interviews were conducted with the General Manager, managers, and top executives from the Fund Raising and Communications Departments.

Data Collection Methods

  • In-depth interviews are most valuable (Lincoln and Guba, 1985).
  • Secondary data was gathered through press articles, leaflets, and the website.
  • Interviews used broad questions for respondent freedom.
  • Content analysis method was used for summation (Stake 1995; Kent 1999).
  • Qualitative content analysis was applied.
  • Material from the interviews was divided into content analytical units and categorized according to the points of interest of this study.

Findings

General Information

  • WWF established in Greece in 1990, became independent in 1995.
  • WWF runs projects since 1991 in the towns Presa and Dadia, since 1993 in Zakynthos island and since 2000 in Papigo village.
  • Conducted campaigns concerning farming and aquaculture in the Acheloos river as well as the revision of the Constitution in 2001.
  • Campaigns included the climate change and toxics.
  • Mission and vision: ‘Harmonic coexistence of man and nature’.
  • Objective: Find donors to adopt endangered animals for 3 euros per month via credit cards selecting from 6 species: Panda, tiger, sea turtle caretta- caretta, dolphins silver-pelican, and howl-eagle

Objectives

  • Goal: Double the number of donators of endangered species, reaching 2,000 by 2011.
  • Collaboration with Eurobank: 25% of shopping with a special credit card goes to WWF.
  • Advertising on the Internet and in magazines.
  • The message is important.

The Market

  • Targets children and schools via children’s magazines.
  • Targets schools through directors and teachers, high-school and university students.
  • Targets adults via newspapers and magazines.
  • Does not focus on corporate members or sponsorships.
  • More than 1,000 people have adopted animals.
  • Adoption service has 25% of total WWF donors.
  • WWF issues a quarterly magazine, ‘The living planet’.
  • Donators receive a poster and information initially.

Competition

  • Operates in a competitive environment.
  • Other environmental organizations:
    • MOM (monk seal protection).
    • Greenpeace (international).
    • Arktouros (wildlife protection).
    • Kallisto (environmental protection in Greece and Balkans).
    • Mesogios SOS (Mediterranean environmental collaboration).
  • All organizations showed a small increase in the number of their donators the recent years.
  • WWF differs by offering 6 species for adoption.
  • All except Greenpeace lack international presence.
  • WWF and Greenpeace collaborate on political and legislative issues.
  • Greenpeace has well-known advertising campaigns via newspapers, magazines, Internet, direct mail, and TV.

PEST Analysis

  • Analysis of external macro-environment (Political, Economic, Social, Technological).
  • These factors are beyond firm's control and can be threats or opportunities (Kotler, 1994).
  • PEST analysis is often done with SWOT.
Political Environment
  • Adoption program is not controlled by laws.
Social Environment
  • Increased public awareness and sensitivity to environmental protection.
  • Greek state's slow adaptation is a problem.
Technological Environment
  • Internet is the primary, low-cost communication medium.
  • Website has 30,000 monthly visitors.
  • Saves 20,000-25,000 Euros compared to direct mail costs.
Economic Environment
  • Influenced by economic conditions.
  • Donations are secondary to basic needs.

SWOT Analysis

  • Audits organization’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (Doyle 1994).
Strengths
  • Low price: 'adopt animals threatened with extinction only with 3 euros'.
  • Free newspaper advertisements.
  • Successful message: strong appeal to people.
Weaknesses
  • Cannot afford TV advertising.
  • Repetitive promotion is limited.
  • Financial constraints limit communication.
  • Payment system relies on credit cards.
Opportunities
  • Increase of Internet users and websites.
Threats
  • Program may become outdated after a decade.

The Marketing Mix

  • The 'four Ps': product, price, place, and promotion (Kotler 1994).
  • A fifth ‘p' is also added known as people.
Product/Service
  • Selling the idea of protecting endangered animals and ecosystems.
  • Species include:
    • Giant Panda.
    • Tigers.
    • Sea Turtle (Caretta-Caretta).
    • Dolphins.
    • Silver Pelicans.
    • Howl-eagle.
  • Donators receive:
    • Certificate.
    • Member’s card.
    • WWF Hellas magazine ‘Live Planet’.
Price
  • Donation is 3 euros per month to cover operational costs.
  • Special prices for pupils, students, and schools (120 Euros per year).
  • Higher donations are possible.
  • No special efforts to attract corporate customers.
Place
  • Direct mail is the main distribution method.
  • Improvement possible via members (volunteers).
Promotion
  • Based on available budget.
  • Mainly newspapers, magazines, and Internet (free).
  • TV is too expensive.
  • Radio is not used i.e. the radio has no pictures of animals.
  • Online ads: animated species, message ‘Adopt one of the species threatened with extinction with 3 euros per month’.
  • Advertising department designs and produces ads.
  • Effectiveness assessed by tracking application sources.
  • Frequent contact with donators via newsletters and monthly magazine.
  • Magazine and newsletter production costs: 15,000-20,000 Euros per year.
  • No sponsorships sought.
People
  • Excellent working conditions and creative positions.
  • Financial resources are allocated in programs for the protection of the environment and it cannot pay high salaries.
  • Training, education, and moral satisfaction are provided.
  • International meetings and seminars are organized.

Discussion

  • Environmental NPOs are increasing due to public concern.
  • WWF Greece established in 1990.
  • Endangered species program has 1,000 donators (25% of total).
  • Maynard (2008), Lake (2008) and Ojiambo (1994) emphasized on target markets, and consistent communication.
  • WWF targets children, schools, teachers, students, and adults.
  • Does not seek corporate sponsorships and should develop their own distinctive competencies.
  • Shapiro (1981) and Ojiambo (1994) claimed that NPOs should develop their own distinctive competencies.
  • WWF offers 6 species for adoption; others offer 1 or 2.
  • Most lack international presence (except Greenpeace).
  • WWF uses marketing practices:
    • Low price appeal.
    • Credit card payments.
    • Slogans and messages.
    • Local volunteer networks.
    • Multiple promotion channels.
    • Monthly magazine.
  • TV advertising is unaffordable.
  • Limited budget restricts communication.
  • Lake (2008) recommended using Internet presence.
  • Lake (2008) and Yorke (2007) recommended advertising objectives, results, benefits, services, donation opportunities and values through magazine and website.
  • WWF has alliances with newspapers and magazines.
  • Lake (2008) suggested the organizations could establish alliances with other organizations.
  • The study examined the marketing practices employed by the organization.
  • Contributed to the non-profit sector.
  • Results support literature findings.