Etymology, practice:
What is the world like? → Metaphysics → What is the world made of? → Is there a god?
How are we to live? → ==Ethics== → What is the good life? → Does it pay to be moral?
→ ==Social/political philosophy== → What is punishment? → ==Aesthetics== → What is art?
How and how much can we know about (1) and (2)?
→ Epistemology (Theory of knowledge) → What is knowledge? → What makes science so unique?
Logic is concerned with the analysis of arguments and straddles all three philosophical sub-disciplines
Strive to get as much of an answer as we can to find out at least where the limits of our understanding lie
Problems philosophers are interested in are often the intractable ones leftover from other disciplines, or ones other disciplines don’t address → What is life? → When do we really know a theory is correct?
It generates the response: it depends on what you mean by… (life, ultimate constituent, knowledge) and it’s just a matter of semantics
Sometimes it does:
pro-life: opposed to abortion or euthanasia OR pro-choice: advocating for legal abortion or euthanasia
There must be a difference between the way the pro-life and the pro-choice use “human” or “person”
The two sides will not just agree that they have a trivial misunderstanding about a word.