The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated and legitimized anti-Asian racism in Canada, leading to increased incidents of discrimination and violence against Asian communities. This situation is rooted in historical biases from Canada's colonial past, where Asian immigrants faced legal inequalities, epitomized by measures like the head tax against Chinese individuals. Amid the pandemic, various studies have documented a rise in anti-Asian racism, revealing that the perceived association of Asians with the virus has led to an increase in mental health issues such as anxiety and depression within these communities. The Chinese Canadian National Council Toronto Chapter reported 1,150 incidents of anti-Asian racism by February 2021, indicating a troubling trend where Canada demonstrates higher per capita rates of such racism than the U.S. These incidents, ranging from verbal abuse to physical violence, paint a dire picture for the wellbeing of Asian Canadians who also contend with health risks related to COVID-19.
Anti-Asian racism is deeply rooted within Canada's colonial history, with the first Chinese and Japanese immigrants being subjected to systemic discrimination. This culture of discrimination has not disappeared; rather, it has transformed in contemporary society. Past events such as the SARS outbreak in 2003 have shown that periods of public health crises often rekindle xenophobia, feeding into the myth of the 'yellow peril.' The COVID-19 pandemic has intensified these sentiments, particularly against East Asians, perpetuated by political rhetoric that frames Asian communities as scapegoats for the virus.
The prevalence of anti-Asian racism has significant ramifications on the mental and physical health of Asian individuals in Canada. Incidents of discrimination not only increase the chance of psychological distress but also result in physical harm to individuals. The social context becomes increasingly hostile, with Asian Canadians navigating both the realities of a pandemic and the additional burden of racism. This compounded stress can signal a need for innovative community resilience strategies, such as organized protests against systemic discrimination.
This analysis also critiques Canadian multiculturalism as a framework that fails to dismantle colonial structures and instead preserves them under a veneer of equality. Despite reforms in societal policy that promote multicultural values since the 1988 Multiculturalism Act, remnants of colonial power influence national discourse and policy. The ongoing racialization of culture results in a persistent hierarchy where white English and French culture is normalized, while other cultures, including Asian, remain marginalized. This tension between inclusion and exclusion underscores the necessity for more profound systemic changes.
Intergroup prejudice is characterized by an ingrained bias that manifests in an array of forms, from implicit to explicit discrimination. Understanding the mechanisms behind this prejudice—such as social categorization and stereotyping—is critical to addressing it. The models presented in the literature emphasize the importance of contextual factors that shape perceptions of Asian individuals as threats during the pandemic. This social framework illustrates how prejudicial attitudes are not merely personal biases but are shaped by broader socio-political contexts.
Social workers are positioned to play a crucial role in advocating against anti-Asian racism. They can bridge gaps between community needs and policymaking through education, outreach, and advocacy to foster social justice. By actively working to understand and dismantle the processes that perpetuate anti-Asian sentiment, social workers can create more inclusive environments. Critical reflection on their own biases is essential in this process, ensuring that they effectively support marginalized communities.
The emergence of anti-Asian racism during the COVID-19 pandemic is a manifestation of deeper historical and structural inequities informed by Canada's postcolonial legacy. This understanding necessitates ongoing dialogue and research aimed at unpacking these complexities. It is imperative for social workers to engage with these issues actively, as their roles in various capacities can help challenge the status quo of discrimination and advocate for meaningful change in both practice and policy.