Extended Discourse Genres: The three primary genres discussed in extended discourse are monologues and structured writing vs conversations.
Writing Examples: Crystal's seventh-grade language sample offers insights into challenges and strengths in her writing. Students engage in group discussions analyzing the content.
Identifying strengths: Transparency in writing, narrative style.
Noted challenges: Lack of grammatical structure, spelling errors, informal language, and omitted words.
Informal Writing Patterns: The informal nature indicates the influence of texting on her language use (e.g., omitting letters). The writing style reflects her everyday communication patterns.
Perspective Taking in Writing: Importance of understanding the audience and tailoring language for clarity in presentation.
Cognitive Demands: Writing, including planning and structure, requires high cognitive functioning, especially for students with language-based disabilities.
Chapter 2: Understanding Writing Terms
Persuasive vs. Argumentative Writing: Both writing styles require perspective consideration and acknowledging different views in arguments.
Cognitive Functioning in Writing: Key components include:
Executive Function: Helps maintain focus and structure in writing tasks.
Meta-Cognitive Skills: Essential for understanding and developing arguments during writing.
Skill Development: Emphasizes the necessity of teaching students about perspective taking and cognitive flexibility, especially for those with broader learning disabilities.
Chapter 3: Different Writing Samples
Assessing Writing Capabilities: Importance of distinguishing writing processes from written products for holistic student assessment.
The writing process involves prewriting, drafting, revising, and editing, which should be supported for developing better written products.
The assessment should include various writing genres, analyzing both content and form.
Chapter 4: Assessing the Writing Process
Observation Techniques: Identifying students' writing processes through observational assessments and determining their writing strategies.
Engagement with Writing: Understanding students' preferences for writing environments helps tailor interventions to enhance their writing skills.
Chapter 5: Types of Assessment Scoring Systems
Holistic Assessment: Provides a single score based on overall impressions, often used for summative tasks.
Primary Trait and Analytic Scoring: Breaks down different writing components (like grammar, organization, or vocabulary) into separate scores for detailed feedback.
Curriculum-Based Measurement: Assesses students’ writing abilities in context with their curriculum, ensuring alignment with content knowledge.
Chapter 6: Macro and Micro Structures in Writing
Macrostructure: Refers to the overall organization and flow of the narrative.
Microstructure: Involves syntax, grammar, and cohesive devices that affect the clarity and readability of writing.
Assessing coherence and cohesion helps in creating specific intervention goals for students struggling with narrative writing.
Chapter 7: Challenges in Writing Fluency
Writing Fluency: Time taken to produce written work and the complexity of that work is evaluated.
Emphasizes the importance of expressive practice as a complement to reading/gaining knowledge.
Chapter 8: Scoring of Writing
Focuses on specific performance metrics such as:
Content Units: Evaluates the number of informative units in the written product.
Sentence Complexity: Assesses how well sentences are structured and combined.
Word Errors: Identifies spelling accuracy to guide content-related interventions.
Chapter 9: Summary and Practical Applications
Intervention Strategies: Through targeted teaching on complex sentence structures and cohesive writing, effective communication skills can be developed in students.
Future Classes: Introduces interaction and hands-on practice for assessing writing components to better inform student interventions in actual classroom settings.
End of Lecture: Focused on reinforcing the main points discussed and encouraging collaborative engagement in assessments and interventions.