Language Skills: Lateralized more than any other brain process, Broca’s and Wernicke’s areas are both only on the left side (for right-handed people)
Function: Central to language processing, especially in producing speech.
Aphasia: Damage results in Broca's Aphasia, characterized by:
Difficulty in speech production (expressive aphasia).
Good comprehension but with meaningful, awkward speech.
Function: Focused on language comprehension
Aphasia: Damage leads to Wernicke's Aphasia, where:
Speech remains fluent but lacks meaning (receptive aphasia).
Poor comprehension; speech sounds normal, but has no meaning
Historical Context: Describes the relationship between damage in Broca’s and Wernicke’s areas on speech production and comprehension.
Symptoms:
Broca's: Normal comprehension, meaningful but awkward speech.
Wernicke's: Speech sounds normal, but lacks meaning.
Techniques: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and cognitive neuroscience techniques provide insights into brain activity during language tasks.
Connectionist Model: Explains interaction between different brain regions in processing language tasks.
Visual Cortex: Analyzes written word images.
Angular Gyrus: Decodes visual information into recognized words, linking them with spoken forms in Wernicke's area.
Arcuate Fasciculus: Transmits word information to Broca's area.
Broca's Area: Forms a motor plan to say the word.
Motor Cortex: Executes the speech plan.
Types of Aphasia:
Nonfluent (Broca's) Aphasia: Nonfluent speech, good comprehension, uncommon paraphasia, poor repetition and naming
Fluent (Wernicke's) Aphasia: Fluent speech, poor comprehension, common paraphasia, poor repetition and naming
Global Aphasia: nonfluent speech, poor comprehension, variable paraphasia, poor repetition and naming
Conduction Aphasia: Fluent speech, good comprehension, common paraphasia, poor repetition and naming
No aphasic patients have damage restricted to Broca’s or Wernicke’s areas
Aphasics almost always have damage to subcortical white matter
Large anterior lesions most likely to produce expressive symptoms
Large posterior lesions most likely to produce receptive symptoms
Global aphasia is usually related to massive lesions of several regions
Aphasics sometimes have damage that does not encroach on Wernicke-Geschwind areas
Damasio and colleagues (1996): PET study of naming
Images of famous faces, animals, and tools
Activity while judging image orientation subtracted from activity while naming
Left temporal lobe areas activated by naming varied with category
Activity seen well beyond Wernicke’s area
Electrical stimulation studies show disruptions in speech production and comprehension based on stimulation sites, giving insight into language processing regions.
Nature vs. Nurture: Language appears to be both innate and learned through experience.
FOXP2 Gene: Related to language development; variations in this gene affect communicative abilities in animals and humans
Language links:
Neanderthals shared our version of FOXP2; chimpanzees do not
Mice with FOXP2 gene mutations do not evoke communicative ultrasonic vocalizations
When FOXP2 expression is blocked, young male birds fail to learn and recite bird song
Critical Period: a period in development when exposure or practice must occur for skills to develop
e.g. visual processing - the plasticity of the brain will reconnect a baby’s neurons from a blind eye; thus the eye must be corrected quickly, or normal sight will never be regained
Sensitive Period: a period in development when exposure or practive will most facilitate the development of skills
e.g. social behaviour - an individual who experiences extreme stress as a child may show social deficits/abnormalities; but these abnormalities can be overcome (sort of; sometimes)
Language skills are most easily developed during early childhood to late adolescence; challenges in language acquisition exist for older learners.
Each hemisphere specializes in different functions; for example:
Left Hemisphere: controlling ipsilateral movement, language capabilities (e.g., Broca's area).
Right Hemisphere: Spatial, emotional, and musical abilities, some memory tasks
Corpus callosum — largest cerebral commisure
Transfers learned information from one hemisphere to another
Cutting the corpus callosum can allow study of the independent functioning of each hemisphere
Findings:
Each hemisphere can learn and exhibit functions independently.
Patients can respond differently based on which hemisphere has perceived stimuli (e.g., right visual field = can verbalize, left = can't)
Many never have another convulsion
The phenomenon where one hemisphere can inform the other through observable facial feedback (cross-cuing) is crucial for understanding lateralization
Each hemisphere of a split-brain patient can learn independently and simultaneously
Helping-hand phenomenon: presented with two different visual stimuli, the hand that “knows” may correct the other
Dual foci of attention: split-brain hemispheres can search for target item in array faster than intact controls
Chimeric figures task: only symmetrical version of right half of faces recognized (indicated competition between hemispheres
The left hemisphere of a split-brain patient sees a single normal face that is a completed version of the half face on the right. At the same time, the right hemisphere sees a single normal face that is a completed version of the half face on the left
Tools to explore lateralized processing of visual stimuli effectively by isolating input to one hemisphere at a time.
Neural circuits involved in language processing reveal parallels between human language capabilities and other species.
Both biological and experiential factors contribute to language development, with certain genes and critical periods influencing abilities.