VIRTUE ETHICS
Virtue Ethics
Concentrates on the character of the actor
More interested not with what makes an act right, but with what makes a person good
Questions what characters are virtuous or vicious
Being a good moral person is more than doing what is right.
Aristotelian Ethics
Nicomachean Ethics
Every art and every inquiry, and similarly every action and pursuit, is thought to aim at some good, and for this reason, the good has rightly been declared to be that at which all things aim. -Aristotle
Knowledge of the ultimate good is crucial in one’s attainment of a good ethical life.
Eudaimonia
The ultimate end of all human actions is eudaimonia.
Eu + daimon = To have a good spirit
A state of being, rather than a feeling or experience
Eudaimonia - “well-being” “flourishing” “living well”
Consists on the (unimpeded) activity of the soul in conformity with virtue
Virtue
To live well, one must develop virtues. (Aristotle)
virtue – (“arete”) excellence
We can be excellent in many fields.
To be a VIRTUOUS PERSON is to achieve excellence as a person.
Virtuous Person
The proper and peculiar end of human beings is to live a life in accordance with reason.
To be virtuous is to develop characteristics or attributes that enable one to live a life of reason.
Courage, Generosity, Temperance
The VIRTUE of courage is different from a courageous act.
Virtues are developed by habit
None is implanted by nature
Virtues and Endowments
Endowments are given by nature; we receive the power of using them first and only later exercise these endowments in action.
With regard to virtues, we have to first practice them before we can acquire them.
Test of Virtue
A man who abstains from bodily pleasures and enjoys doing so is self-controlled; if he finds it troublesome, he is self-indulgent; a man who endures danger with joy, or at least without pain, is courageous; if he endures it with pain, he is a coward. (Aristotle)
Doctrine of the Mean
Achieving eudaimonia or well-being is a matter of living one’s life in accordance with reason.
Aristotle notes that the mean between extremes does not lie in the act, but is relative to the moral agent.
This means that what constitutes a virtuous action can vary from person to person, depending on their individual circumstances and the specific context in which they find themselves.