Importance of Assessment
Assessment involves collecting and interpreting relevant information about a client.
Aids in understanding the individual’s problems which includes predicting behavior, treatment planning, and evaluating treatment response.
Provides evidence of a disorder leading to diagnosis while ruling out alternatives.
Predict
Understand likely future functioning or the course of the disorder (e.g., work performance may indicate stability).
Plan
Involves treatment planning, including identifying essential treatment components and providers (e.g., psychiatry).
Progress
Monitors treatment progress by comparing current symptoms as treatment continues.
Intake Interview/Assessment
Diagnosis
Treatment
Misdiagnosis examples highlight the importance of thorough assessments:
Deafness mistaken for intellectual developmental disorder.
Epilepsy misdiagnosed as schizophrenia.
Medication reactions misinterpreted as depression.
Brain tumors misreported as anorexia nervosa.
Externalizing behaviors and depression misdiagnosed as bipolar disorder particularly in people of color.
After data collection, significance interpretation is crucial for coherent treatment planning.
Key factors to consider include:
The theoretical orientation of the clinician.
Potential overemphasis on external situations.
Risks of inaccurate data or premature evaluations.
Possible cultural bias of the assessment tools or the clinician.
Different aspects of identity include:
Religious or Spiritual Affiliation
Age
Physical, Emotional, Developmental (Dis)Ability
Race and Ethnicity
Socio-Economic Status
Gender
National Origin
Sexual Orientation
Prompts for reflection:
Identities you think about most and least often.
Identities you want to learn more about and their impact on your self-perception.
Activity on Canvas Quizzes related to the social identity wheel.
Followed by breakout group discussions to reflect on the experience and insights gained.
Discuss experiences of completing the identity wheel, surprises, reflections on visibility and value of identities, and future learning aspirations related to identity.
Explore relationships with salient identities and perceptions by others based on identity.
Henry, a 19-year-old college student, exhibited odd behavior and preoccupation in class, raising suspicion among peers and faculty.
His beliefs regarding his classmates and external perceptions reflect deeper psychological concerns.
A structured 16-item interview designed to uncover cultural influences on mental health during assessments.
Aims to develop an understanding of the client’s narrative of illness and their social context.
Involves 9 categories of questions focused on a client’s cultural relationship and its relevance to their concerns.
Encourages clinicians to reflect on their own assumptions prior to assessments.
Key aspects to address during an intake:
Presenting problem and its context (e.g., situational vs. pervasive symptoms).
Prior treatments and their effects.
Short-term treatment goals based on future expectations.
Reliability: Consistency of results.
Validity: Accuracy; matches "truth".
Possible scenarios:
Reliable and valid.
Reliable but not valid.
Neither reliable nor valid.
Scores more than 2 standard deviations from the mean are considered significantly different.
Standardization enables normative and self-referent comparisons.
Clinical Interviews: Forms include structured, semi-structured, and unstructured formats.
Mental Status Exam: Inquiries and observations assessing psychological functioning (e.g., awareness, mood, behavior).
Specific instruments for adults, such as the Anxiety and Related Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM-5 (ADIS-5) and the Clinician Interview Schedule.