Factors Related to School Shootings:
Early childhood trauma
Actions of other shooters observed
Reaching a crisis point
Availability of means to carry out violent plans
Unlearning Behaviors:
Rewriting the script for potential shooters
Enforcing a no notoriety policy for shooters
Preventive intervention by educators
Criminal prosecution of parents of shooters
Issues related to providing guns to shooters
Failure to recognize and act on warning signs
Social Learning Theory - Differential Reinforcement:
Criminal behavior is learned through:
Imitation
Direct conditioning
Rewards from behaviors
Avoidance of negative reinforcement
Punishment serving as a deterrent
Behavioral Definitions:
Criminal behavior is shaped by:
Associations with groups that control reinforcement and punishment
Exposure to behavioral models and norms
Neutralization Theory:
"Drifting" between criminal and conventional values
Experience of guilt
Respect and admiration for law-abiding individuals
Choices on who to victimize
Participation in law-abiding activities
Common Neutralization Techniques:
Denial of responsibility
Denial of injury
Denial of victim
Condemnation of the condemners
Appeal to higher loyalties
Social Process Theories:
Social Learning Theory: "People are good and learn to be bad."
Social Control Theory: "People are bad and learn to be good."
Labeling Theory: "People are controlled by the reactions of others, regardless of being good or bad."
Core Concepts of Social Control Theory:
Assumes people are inherently bad, requiring control for goodness
Asks, "Why don’t people commit crimes?"
- Emphasis on social bonds through conventional institutions
Fear of harming conventional relationships plays a role
Attachment:
Connection to others fosters social norms and behavior expectations
Commitment:
Engagement in conformity creating a stake in proper behavior
Involvement:
Limited resources like time and energy draw people toward conventional activities
Strict schedules and deadlines reduce opportunities for criminal behavior
Proverb: "Idle hands are the devil’s workshop."
Belief:
Shared common values on right/wrong leads to no need for neutralization
Criminals may recognize wrongdoing yet persist
Individuals vary in their adherence to societal rules; weaker belief increases likelihood of violations
Social Bonds as Controls:
How social bonds prevent criminal behavior
Comparison between influence of parents and peers:
Peers may lure into delinquency
Light family influence counteracts peer delinquency
Research Question by Warr:
Examines the interaction between parents and peers
Research Design:
Utilized National Youth Survey for quantitative data
Random sampling of US households collecting self-reported delinquency and influences
Findings:
Parents & peers do not work independently in influencing behavior
Quantity of time with family can mitigate delinquent peer impact
Family attachment reduces risk of associating with delinquent friends
Variability in Self-Control:
Individuals differ in susceptibility to criminal temptations
No unique skills required to engage in crime
Influence of Caregivers:
Lack of care from parents leads to behavioral issues
Insufficient parental engagement in monitoring behaviors
Parents’ failure to recognize or punish deviance is crucial
Consequences of Criminal Parenting:
Criminal parents often fail to socialize their children appropriately
Most disapprove of crime, yet their lifestyle negatively influences children
Crime vs. Self-Control:
Crime offers immediate satisfaction
Excitement and risk associated with crime drive involvement
Few skills needed for participation increase likelihood among social individuals
Gottfredson & Hirschi's View:
Those lacking self-control tend to be:
Impulsive, insensitive, and risk-taking
Engage in criminal or related acts due to nature
Strengths and Limitations:
Explains a broader range of crimes than structural theories
Applicable across cultures
Fails to adequately explain senseless violence
Potential flaws in understanding causal relationships