Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Notes

Introduction to Integrated Pest Management (IPM)

Understanding Integrated Pest Management

  • Main Ideas:

    • What is Integrated Pest Management (IPM)?
    • What does IPM do?
    • How can producers use it effectively?
    • How can they stay updated with IPM technology?
  • Definition of IPM: A comprehensive system of choosing pest management practices from all available agronomic practices.

    • Includes cultural, biological, mechanical, and chemical techniques.
  • Selection Criteria (IPM techniques must be):

    • Effective
    • Environmentally safe
    • Give practical and achievable results
    • Economically profitable
  • Agronomic Practice Selection:

    • Know the crop's growth cycle and how pests affect different stages.
    • Recognize and identify the pest.
    • Working knowledge of the pest:
      • What causes the pest to flourish?
      • What control methods exist?
      • How weather influences populations and life cycle stages?
    • Know options to prevent infestation.
    • Select control options if infestation occurs.
    • Keep up with weather forecasts that influence pest activity.
    • Be aware of the latest research on new IPM methods.
  • Importance of Prevention: With most agronomic problems, there are few "rescue" programs (except for row crops), emphasizing prevention.

Nonchemical Controls

  • Healthy Crop: Good growth competes with weeds and resists insects/diseases.

  • Practical Practices to Minimize Chemical Controls:

    • Crop Rotation: Growing a planned sequence of crops in order.
      • Benefit: Changes field environment, making it harder for pests to establish.
    • Correct Planting Date: Choose based on temperature.
      • Ensures crop is most competitive and mature enough to withstand insect attacks.
    • Correct Planting Rate: Creates an environment conducive to crop growth.
      • More competitive against weeds.
    • Clean Certified Seed: Reduces weed introduction.
    • Resistant Varieties: Natural protection from pest invasions.
      • Many new resistant varieties are produced using genetic engineering (biotechnology).
    • Soil Testing: Provides correct nutrients to reduce plant stress and pest susceptibility.

Use of Rescue Measures

  • Rescue Measures: Spraying, biological predators, cultivating, and vacuuming.

  • Economic Threshold: A principle to decide when to use rescue measures.

    • Scouting determines insect types and crop damage risk.
    • Decisions made on treatment type and timing based on scouting results.
    • Definition: The level at which the potential damage value by a pest exceeds the cost to correct the problem.

Research on New IPM Methods

  • Primary Goal: Develop new alternatives to pesticides and integrated tactics.

  • Examples of Tactics Under Development:

    • Insect attractants
    • Biopesticides
    • Host plant resistance
    • Cultural practices (altered row spacing, rotation patterns) to reduce weeds
    • Physical barriers (mulches)
  • Useful Advances Include:

    • Host Plant Resistance: Developed via traditional breeding and genetic engineering.
      • Transgenic plants producing biopesticides or resisting virus infection (viral coat proteins, enzymes).
    • Pesticide Resistance Management: Understanding how natural and artificial selection lead to pest resistance.
      • Useful in designing IPM systems to limit resistance development.
    • Application Technology: Delivers the minimum pesticide amount for control.
      • Reduces adverse impacts on nontarget organisms.
    • Forecasting Pest Movement: Precisely time control methods.
      • Technologies to improve forecasting of aerial pest movement.

Sources of Latest IPM Information

  • Best IPM tactics are constantly changing.

  • Researchers discover and develop new methods and strategies.

  • Producers/applicators must stay updated on weather and insect forecasts.

  • Information Sources:

    • Agricultural chemical dealers
    • Major food processors (encourage IPM methods in contract growers)
    • Private consultants (in at least 38 states)
    • Land grant universities, state extension services, USDA
    • Communications networks (researchers, extension staff, private consultants, producers)
    • Electronic communications networks (fast information movement)
    • World Wide Web (new possibilities)
    • National IPM Network (four regional IPM servers with regional/state information)

Natural Methods of Insect Control

  • Main Idea: How to control insects without toxic pesticides.

  • Current Situation: Most harmful insects controlled with chemical insecticides.

    • Kill pests but also harm beneficial insects (bees).
    • Countless formulas exist for over one million pest insect species.
  • EPA Estimates: 40,000 people treated for pesticide poisoning annually (may be underreported).

    • Ninety percent of American households use pesticides in homes/yards/gardens.
    • US uses about a billion pounds of pesticides per year (100 times more than in the 1930s).
    • Food crop loss to insects is almost twice as great as 40-50 years ago.
  • Problems with Chemical Pesticides:

    • Destruction of natural predators.
    • Increased pest resistance.
    • Contamination of food crops, water supply, fish, wildlife, and humans.

Types of Natural Controls

  • Reduce the need for chemical controls by working with nature.

  • Methods:

    • Encouraging or introducing natural enemies (predators)
    • Using nontoxic biologically produced pesticides
    • Using nontoxic insecticides based on "mechanical" control
    • Developing/using insect-resistant crop varieties
  • Natural Insect Enemies (Three General Groups):

    • Predators
    • Parasitic insects (parasitoids)
    • Insect pathogens
  • Parasites:

    • Example: Wasps laying eggs inside aphids.
    • Immature wasps develop on/inside hosts, killing them as they mature.
    • Adult wasps emerge and repeat the cycle.
  • Predators:

    • Consume many prey during their lifetime.
    • Example: Ladybugs (lady beetles)
    • Some stink bugs are predatory; nymphs and adults feed on caterpillars, beetle larvae, and other insects.
    • Predators of Colorado potato beetle larvae.
  • Pathogens:

    • Nematodes, bacteria, viruses, fungi, and protozoa that may kill hosts.
  • Using Natural Enemies (Three Methods):

    • Introducing exotic natural enemies
      • To permanently control native or introduced pests.
    • Conservation method: Modify the environment to favor natural enemy growth.
    • Periodically releasing natural enemies (augmentation method).
  • Conservation Method Importance:

    • Practical and easiest for farmers.
    • Reduce the rate/frequency of pesticide applications.
    • IPM methods include scouting to determine pests and predators, informing chemical use.
    • Applying the "economic threshold" approach.

Insect Resistant Crops

  • Promising way to reduce chemical applications.

  • Examples:

    • Cotton (developed by Monsanto and released in 1996)
    • Insect-resistant corn
  • Resistance from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt), a natural soil bacterium.

    • Bt protein incorporated into plants controls caterpillars (cotton bollworm, tobacco budworm, pink bollworm).

Nontoxic Insecticides

  • Biological pesticides used by gardeners (e.g., Bacillus thuringiensis).

    • Kills specific insects, harmless to humans.
    • Genetic engineers use Bt protein to develop resistant crops.
  • Nipcon: Patented and registered in the US and Canada, meets USDA and EPA criteria.

    • Not a typical insecticide.
    • Uses: Industrial buildings, warehouses, stores, homes, schools, hospitals, and food handling establishments.
    • No warnings required for children or pets.
  • Nipcon effectively controls:

    • leafhoppers
    • houseflies
    • mites
    • silverfish
    • beetles
    • ants
    • crickets
    • trips
    • fleas
    • box elder bugs
    • aphids
    • leafroller
    • cockroaches
  • Nipcon advantage: 13 chemical agents needed to eradicate the same insect list.

  • Also nontoxic and biodegradable.

  • Nipcon Formulation:

    • Diatomaceous Earth - 88.0\%
    • Ethomeen - 10.0\%
    • Pyrethrum - 0.2\%
    • Inert Ingredients - 0.8\%
    • Technical Piperonyl Butoxide - 1.0\%
  • Diatomaceous Earth: Dead one-cell organisms from ocean/lake floors.

    • Diatom skeletons appear sharp with multiedged spears under a microscope.
    • Punctures insect's waxy coat, causing dehydration (desiccation).
    • Bees have a mechanism protecting them from d.e.
  • Pyrethrum: Extract from chrysanthemums.

    • Causes rapid death or paralysis.
  • Technical Piperonyl Butoxide: From pepper plants.

    • Prolongs pyrethrum's life.
  • Ethomeen: From animal fats.

    • Unlocks d.e. and pyrethrum's killing powers.
  • Insects avoid d.e. spears.

  • Nipcon: Natural, safe for humans and animals.

Merits of Mechanical Weed Control

  • Main Idea: Leverage mechanical weed control to reduce or eliminate chemical weed killers.

  • Challenge: Weed control is difficult for producers aiming to reduce input costs and pesticide contamination.

  • Abandoned fields quickly become overtaken by weeds.

  • Weeds are highly competitive and cannot be ignored.

  • Weeds can develop resistance to chemical controls with overuse.

  • Weed Control Practices (Four Categories):

    • Cultural practices: Crop rotation, timed field operations.
    • Careful selection of crop varieties (quick emergence, high tolerance, early canopy).
    • Consider cropping system, weed species, weather, and costs.
    • Biological control: Cover crops.
    • Uses allelopathic effects (chemical effect of one plant on another).
    • Chemical weed controls: Preemergence and post-emergence herbicides.
    • Mechanical controls: Cultivation methods, hand pulling.
    • Rotary hoe is relatively low-cost.

Mechanical Weed Control

  • Dates back to the dawn of agriculture, still used widely.

  • Often combined with chemical control.

  • Comparison:

    • Mechanical cultivation is more labor-intensive than chemical treatments.
    • Chemicals require purchased inputs but reduce labor.
    • Environmental impact and health risks of herbicides are a concern.
  • Tradeoffs: Weed control choices must balance environmental contamination, labor, time, health hazards, soil erosion, effectiveness, economics, herbicide carryover, and equipment needs.

Reducing Herbicides

  • Farmers often choose to reduce herbicide amounts rather than eliminate them entirely.

  • Methods: Lower rates or banding herbicides (in-row) with cultivation (between rows).

  • Producer Concerns: Reduced yield if weeds are not sufficiently controlled.

  • Additional Factors:

    • Labor: Must be available when cultivation is needed.
    • Field management: Accurate weed identification, weather monitoring, and timely cultivation are critical.
    • Weed control: Control may not be adequate for all situations with reduced rates.
    • Full rates may be needed for weeds like shattercane, wild proso millet, woolly cupgrass, and quack grass.
    • Cloddy soil surfaces or crop debris may hinder lower herbicide rates and cultivation.
    • Application rates: Manufacturers have no liability for below-specification applications.
    • Success depends on timely cultivation.
  • Reduce application rates are not recommended if timely cultivation cannot be assured or if there is a problem with hard-to-control weeds.

Managing Cultivation

  • Sustainable approaches require more labor and management.

  • Concern about herbicides in groundwater increases interest in mechanical weed control.

  • Herbicide-resistant weeds (lambsquarter, red-root pigweed) may require cultivation.

  • Likely solution: Alternate cultivation with chemical controls.

  • Effective mechanical weed control requires knowledge of weed identification and growth characteristics.

  • Rotary hoeing is most effective when weeds are in the white hair stage (germination to emergence).

  • Works on all plants, thinning crop stands (may need increased planting rates).

  • Shallow disturbance breaks soil crusts and aids crop emergence and water influence.

  • Hot, dry weather improves cultivation success.

  • Additional hoeing operations are typically performed seven to ten days later.

  • A third hoeing can be done if weed pressure is heavy or crop growth slow.

  • Limited information indicates that plants in excess of four to five inches may be permanently damaged.

  • Final mechanical weed control is cultivation with specialized equipment for in-row weeds.

  • Hilling mechanisms can be added to conventional field cultivators.