1. gross domestic product

gross domestic product


what is gdp?

  • gross domestic product (gdp): market value of all final (new) goods and services produced within a country in a year

    • most popular measure of economic activity in a timeframe

    • also tracks total spending and income

    • “of all”: counts every price of goods and services (comparable and incomparable)

  • market value: how much something costs in the marketplace (what you pay)

    • an item’s worth in gdp is determined by its price

  • final goods and services: will not be sold again as another good/service or to make something else

    • capital goods: items used to create other things that are considered final goods

      • pizzeria buys an oven to make pizzas


what gdp doesn’t account

  • not a perfect measure of everything that is important

  • value of services/goods gained (internal value)


measuring gdp


  • perfect data means all approaches equal the same value

    • all approaches are the same but different ways of looking at economic activity


expenditure approach

  • adds up total spending on final goods and services produced within the economy

    • c - consumption (clothes, snacks)

      • make up most of gdp

    • i - investment (company machinery, capital goods)

      • not stocks or bonds

    • g - (direct) government purchases (school or parks)

    • n - net exports = exports - imports

      • x - net exports (sold to other countries)

      • m - net imports (goods bought from other countries)

        • don’t contribute to gdp


income approach

  • gross domestic income: all income earned by households and businesses from producing goods and services

    • wages for workers

    • profits for businesses

    • tax collected by the government

  • add up income earned by factors of production or inputs

    • every dollar spent is income for someone else (money flow)

total spending = total income

  • how much everyone in the economy is making (change in gdp = change in income)

  • gdp/capita: how much income each person in the country have

    • gdi/population


production (value-added) approach

  • sums up the value added by each industry in the economy (total output of an economy)

    • value added = revenue - cost of intermediate inputs

    • intermediate inputs: production costs



9.1 gdp and the macroeconomy


  • macroeconomics: studies the economy as a whole rather than individual markets

    • built on microeconomics: individual decisions still matter, but focus shifts to totals

  • key macro questions focus on:

    • total income

    • total output

    • total spending

  • gdp: is the main tool used to measure overall economic activity

from micro to macro

  • microeconomics: individual income, output, and spending

  • macroeconomics: economy-wide income, output, and spending

  • same concepts, different scale

the circular flow

  • shows interdependence between households and businesses

  • households:

    • supply labour and capital

    • receive wages and profits

  • businesses:

    • demand labour and capital

    • produce goods and services

  • money flows in the opposite direction of goods and services

  • every flow of resources is matched by a flow of money


key implication of the circular flow

  • total spending = total output = total income

  • gdp measures this shared value

definition of gdp

  • market value of all final goods and services

  • produced within a country

  • in a given year

breaking down the definition

  • market value

    • goods are valued using market prices

    • allows comparison of very different goods using dollars

  • all

    • includes goods and services

    • includes government production

    • excludes non-market activity (imports)

  • final goods and services

    • counts only finished goods

    • avoids double counting intermediate goods

      • double counting: intermediate goods and final goods are included

  • produced

    • includes newly produced goods

    • excludes resale of existing goods

  • within a country

    • includes domestic production even if foreign-owned

    • excludes production abroad even if canadian-owned

  • in a year

    • gdp is a flow, not a stock

    • measures activity over time, not total wealth

gdp per person

  • gdp divided by population

  • used for comparisons across countries and over time

  • interpreted as average income, output, and spending

9.2 gdp measures spending, output, and income (expenditure approach)



  • gdp can be measured in three equivalent ways:

    • total spending

    • total output

    • total income

gdp as total spending

  • gdp includes spending on final goods only

  • unsold goods (inventories) are included because they are produced

four components of spending

  • consumption (c)

    • household spending on goods and services

    • includes durable goods and imputed rent for homeowners

  • investment (i)

    • spending on new capital goods

    • includes machinery, buildings, r&d, inventories

    • includes new housing

    • excludes stocks, bonds, and resale of existing assets

  • government purchases (g)

    • spending on goods and services by government

    • includes wages of public workers

    • excludes transfer payments

  • net exports (nx)

    • exports - imports

    • imports are subtracted because they are not domestically produced

gdp identity

  • gdp = c + i + g + nx

    • this is always true by definition

9.3 gdp as total output (production (value-added) approach)


  • gdp equals the total value of what is produced measured using value added

value added

  • contribution each firm makes to production

    • value of sales - cost of intermediate inputs


why value added matters

  • prevents double counting

  • shows how production is spread across stages

  • adding value added at all stages equals final price

structure of production

  • service sector dominates modern economies

  • goods production is a smaller share of gdp

  • helps identify which industries are largest or growing

9.4 gdp as total income (income approach)


  • every dollar spent becomes income for someone else

  • gdp equals the sum of all incomes earned

main components of income

  • wages and salaries paid to workers

  • profits earned by business owners

what is excluded

  • capital gains from selling assets

  • resale of existing assets

  • speculative gains

income distribution

  • labour share: portion of gdp paid to workers

  • capital share: portion paid to owners of capital

  • changes over time affect inequality and living standards

9.5 what gdp captures and what it misses


  • gdp is widely used because it is measurable and consistent

  • but it is not a perfect measure of well-being

major limitations of gdp

  1. prices are not values

    • market prices do not reflect true importance or usefulness

    • consumer surplus is ignored

    • free digital services add little to gdp (since users don’t pay for them)

  2. nonmarket activities are excluded

    • housework, childcare, volunteering not counted

    • paying someone to do the same work increases gdp artificially

  3. shadow economy is missing

    • cash jobs, illegal activities, unreported income excluded

    • can be a significant portion of actual economic activity

  4. environmental degradation is ignored

    • resource depletion counted as production

    • pollution and climate damage not subtracted

  5. leisure is not counted

    • more work increases gdp but may reduce quality of life

  6. distribution of income is ignored

    • gdp per person is an average

    • does not show who benefits from growth

9.6 gdp as a measure of living standards


  • gdp per person measures average income, not happiness

  • higher gdp gives societies more resources to pursue well-being

why gdp still matters

  • strongly correlated with:

    • higher life satisfaction

    • better health outcomes

    • longer life expectancy

    • more education

    • lower infant mortality

  • higher income improves access to necessities and opportunities

key takeaway

  • gdp does not measure everything that matters

  • it measures the resources available to improve living standards

  • how those resources are used determines quality of life

  • high gdp means a higher means to improve better living standards, not that everyone already has high living standards


four reasons why gdp is a useful number


  1. gdp is a good measure of productive capacity

  2. gdp correlates strongly with things people care about

  3. gdp is measured consistently & objectively

  4. gdp tracks changes over time very well


what gdp is

  • gdp measures the total market value of final goods & services produced within a country in a given period

  • it focuses on production & income generated, not directly on happiness or well-being

  • commonly criticized for “not measuring what matters,” but the article argues this misunderstands gdp’s purpose

gdp is a good measure of productive capacity

  • gdp captures how much an economy can produce using its labor, capital, & technology

  • higher gdp generally means a country can:

    • feed more people

    • build more infrastructure

    • fund healthcare, education, & defense

  • productive capacity matters because it constrains what a society can realistically achieve

    • a country with a low gdp WANTS better education, but does not have the means to achieve it

  • even if gdp doesn’t measure happiness, productive capacity strongly affects living standards

gdp correlates strongly with things people care about

  • countries with higher gdp per capita tend to have:

    • longer life expectancy

    • lower infant mortality

    • better health outcomes

    • higher education levels

  • while gdp does not guarantee well-being, low gdp almost guarantees hardship

  • many social improvements historically followed economic growth, not the other way around

gdp is measured consistently & objectively

  • gdp relies on market transactions with observable prices

  • this makes it:

    • comparable across countries

    • comparable across time

    • less dependent on subjective judgments

  • alternative measures (happiness, life satisfaction, “quality of life”) depend on surveys & personal interpretation

  • objective measurement is valuable for policymaking & economic analysis

gdp tracks changes over time very well

  • even if gdp is imperfect in level terms, it is especially useful for tracking growth & recessions

  • changes in gdp reliably indicate:

    • economic expansions

    • economic downturns

    • recoveries after crises

  • policymakers use gdp trends to decide on:

    • stimulus spending

    • interest rate changes

    • fiscal & monetary policy responses

common criticisms of gdp (and responses)

  • “gdp ignores inequality”

    • true, but gdp was never meant to measure distribution

    • inequality can be studied using separate tools (gini coefficient, income shares)

  • “gdp ignores unpaid work”

    • true, but including unpaid work would require subjective valuation

    • market-based measures remain clearer & more consistent

  • “gdp ignores environmental damage”

    • gdp measures production, not sustainability

    • environmental costs can be added through separate environmental accounts or regulations

why gdp should not be replaced

  • no alternative measure has matched gdp’s:

    • clarity

    • consistency

    • predictive usefulness

  • replacing gdp with a single “well-being index” would mix many value judgments into one number

  • gdp works best as a foundational measure, supplemented by other indicators

how gdp should be used

  • gdp should be treated as:

    • a core economic indicator

    • not a complete measure of human welfare

  • best practice is to pair gdp with:

    • inequality measures

    • health & education statistics

    • environmental indicators

  • misuse of gdp comes from overinterpreting it, not from the measure itself

beyond gdp


main argument

  • gdp is an important economic indicator but is inadequate as a measure of overall well-being

  • policymaking that focuses narrowly on gdp can lead to distorted priorities

  • societies should adopt broader metrics that reflect how people actually live & feel

limits of gdp as a measure

  • gdp measures market production, not quality of life

  • it ignores how income is distributed

    • rising gdp can coincide with stagnant or falling living standards for most people

  • it does not account for unpaid work

    • household labor, caregiving, & volunteer work are excluded

  • environmental degradation can increase gdp

    • cleanup after pollution raises gdp even though well-being declines

  • gdp treats “bads” as “goods”

    • spending due to crime, illness, or accidents increases gdp


disconnect between gdp growth & lived experience

  • in many advanced economies, gdp has grown while:

    • median wages stagnated

    • job insecurity increased

    • economic anxiety rose

  • people judge economic success by their own circumstances, not national averages

  • this gap fuels mistrust in institutions & economic policy

importance of distribution

  • well-being depends not just on total income, but on who receives it

  • inequality affects:

    • social cohesion

    • health outcomes

    • political stability

  • a dollar gained by a low-income household increases well-being more than a dollar gained by the wealthy

  • ignoring distribution leads to misleading conclusions about progress

health, education, & security as core components of well-being

  • good health is central to quality of life, independent of income

  • education affects:

    • future opportunities

    • civic participation

    • economic resilience

  • economic security matters

    • fear of unemployment or medical costs reduces well-being even if income is stable

  • gdp does not capture these dimensions adequately

environmental sustainability

  • current gdp ignores long-term environmental costs

  • growth that depletes natural resources undermines future well-being

  • climate change & ecological damage represent a failure of current metrics

  • true progress requires accounting for sustainability & intergenerational equity

subjective well-being

  • people’s own assessments of their lives provide valuable information

  • happiness & life-satisfaction data:

    • capture aspects of life missed by income statistics

    • reveal mental health & social stress

  • subjective measures should complement, not replace, objective indicators


alternative frameworks & indicators

  • well-being should be measured across multiple dimensions, including:

    • income & consumption

    • health

    • education

    • environmental quality

    • security

    • social connections

  • composite dashboards are preferred over a single index

  • this avoids hiding trade-offs behind one number

policy implications

  • what governments measure shapes what they prioritize

  • better metrics lead to:

    • more inclusive growth strategies

    • stronger social safety nets

    • greater focus on sustainability

  • measuring well-being improves democratic accountability

    • citizens can better judge whether policies improve their lives

overall conclusion

  • gdp remains useful for measuring economic activity

  • it should not be treated as a proxy for social progress

  • a shift toward well-being metrics allows for more accurate, humane, & forward-looking policymaking