1. gross domestic product
gross domestic product
what is gdp?
gross domestic product (gdp): market value of all final (new) goods and services produced within a country in a year
most popular measure of economic activity in a timeframe
also tracks total spending and income
“of all”: counts every price of goods and services (comparable and incomparable)
market value: how much something costs in the marketplace (what you pay)
an item’s worth in gdp is determined by its price
final goods and services: will not be sold again as another good/service or to make something else
capital goods: items used to create other things that are considered final goods
pizzeria buys an oven to make pizzas
what gdp doesn’t account
not a perfect measure of everything that is important
value of services/goods gained (internal value)
measuring gdp
perfect data means all approaches equal the same value
all approaches are the same but different ways of looking at economic activity
expenditure approach
adds up total spending on final goods and services produced within the economy
c - consumption (clothes, snacks)
make up most of gdp
i - investment (company machinery, capital goods)
not stocks or bonds
g - (direct) government purchases (school or parks)
n - net exports = exports - imports
x - net exports (sold to other countries)
m - net imports (goods bought from other countries)
don’t contribute to gdp
income approach
gross domestic income: all income earned by households and businesses from producing goods and services
wages for workers
profits for businesses
tax collected by the government
add up income earned by factors of production or inputs
every dollar spent is income for someone else (money flow)
total spending = total income
how much everyone in the economy is making (change in gdp = change in income)
gdp/capita: how much income each person in the country have
gdi/population
production (value-added) approach
sums up the value added by each industry in the economy (total output of an economy)
value added = revenue - cost of intermediate inputs
intermediate inputs: production costs
9.1 gdp and the macroeconomy
macroeconomics: studies the economy as a whole rather than individual markets
built on microeconomics: individual decisions still matter, but focus shifts to totals
key macro questions focus on:
total income
total output
total spending
gdp: is the main tool used to measure overall economic activity
from micro to macro
microeconomics: individual income, output, and spending
macroeconomics: economy-wide income, output, and spending
same concepts, different scale
the circular flow
shows interdependence between households and businesses
households:
supply labour and capital
receive wages and profits
businesses:
demand labour and capital
produce goods and services
money flows in the opposite direction of goods and services
every flow of resources is matched by a flow of money
key implication of the circular flow
total spending = total output = total income
gdp measures this shared value
definition of gdp
market value of all final goods and services
produced within a country
in a given year
breaking down the definition
market value
goods are valued using market prices
allows comparison of very different goods using dollars
all
includes goods and services
includes government production
excludes non-market activity (imports)
final goods and services
counts only finished goods
avoids double counting intermediate goods
double counting: intermediate goods and final goods are included
produced
includes newly produced goods
excludes resale of existing goods
within a country
includes domestic production even if foreign-owned
excludes production abroad even if canadian-owned
in a year
gdp is a flow, not a stock
measures activity over time, not total wealth
gdp per person
gdp divided by population
used for comparisons across countries and over time
interpreted as average income, output, and spending
9.2 gdp measures spending, output, and income (expenditure approach)
gdp can be measured in three equivalent ways:
total spending
total output
total income
gdp as total spending
gdp includes spending on final goods only
unsold goods (inventories) are included because they are produced
four components of spending
consumption (c)
household spending on goods and services
includes durable goods and imputed rent for homeowners
investment (i)
spending on new capital goods
includes machinery, buildings, r&d, inventories
includes new housing
excludes stocks, bonds, and resale of existing assets
government purchases (g)
spending on goods and services by government
includes wages of public workers
excludes transfer payments
net exports (nx)
exports - imports
imports are subtracted because they are not domestically produced
gdp identity
gdp = c + i + g + nx
this is always true by definition
9.3 gdp as total output (production (value-added) approach)
gdp equals the total value of what is produced measured using value added
value added
contribution each firm makes to production
value of sales - cost of intermediate inputs
why value added matters
prevents double counting
shows how production is spread across stages
adding value added at all stages equals final price
structure of production
service sector dominates modern economies
goods production is a smaller share of gdp
helps identify which industries are largest or growing
9.4 gdp as total income (income approach)
every dollar spent becomes income for someone else
gdp equals the sum of all incomes earned
main components of income
wages and salaries paid to workers
profits earned by business owners
what is excluded
capital gains from selling assets
resale of existing assets
speculative gains
income distribution
labour share: portion of gdp paid to workers
capital share: portion paid to owners of capital
changes over time affect inequality and living standards
9.5 what gdp captures and what it misses
gdp is widely used because it is measurable and consistent
but it is not a perfect measure of well-being
major limitations of gdp
prices are not values
market prices do not reflect true importance or usefulness
consumer surplus is ignored
free digital services add little to gdp (since users don’t pay for them)
nonmarket activities are excluded
housework, childcare, volunteering not counted
paying someone to do the same work increases gdp artificially
shadow economy is missing
cash jobs, illegal activities, unreported income excluded
can be a significant portion of actual economic activity
environmental degradation is ignored
resource depletion counted as production
pollution and climate damage not subtracted
leisure is not counted
more work increases gdp but may reduce quality of life
distribution of income is ignored
gdp per person is an average
does not show who benefits from growth
9.6 gdp as a measure of living standards
gdp per person measures average income, not happiness
higher gdp gives societies more resources to pursue well-being
why gdp still matters
strongly correlated with:
higher life satisfaction
better health outcomes
longer life expectancy
more education
lower infant mortality
higher income improves access to necessities and opportunities
key takeaway
gdp does not measure everything that matters
it measures the resources available to improve living standards
how those resources are used determines quality of life
high gdp means a higher means to improve better living standards, not that everyone already has high living standards
four reasons why gdp is a useful number
gdp is a good measure of productive capacity
gdp correlates strongly with things people care about
gdp is measured consistently & objectively
gdp tracks changes over time very well
what gdp is
gdp measures the total market value of final goods & services produced within a country in a given period
it focuses on production & income generated, not directly on happiness or well-being
commonly criticized for “not measuring what matters,” but the article argues this misunderstands gdp’s purpose
gdp is a good measure of productive capacity
gdp captures how much an economy can produce using its labor, capital, & technology
higher gdp generally means a country can:
feed more people
build more infrastructure
fund healthcare, education, & defense
productive capacity matters because it constrains what a society can realistically achieve
a country with a low gdp WANTS better education, but does not have the means to achieve it
even if gdp doesn’t measure happiness, productive capacity strongly affects living standards
gdp correlates strongly with things people care about
countries with higher gdp per capita tend to have:
longer life expectancy
lower infant mortality
better health outcomes
higher education levels
while gdp does not guarantee well-being, low gdp almost guarantees hardship
many social improvements historically followed economic growth, not the other way around
gdp is measured consistently & objectively
gdp relies on market transactions with observable prices
this makes it:
comparable across countries
comparable across time
less dependent on subjective judgments
alternative measures (happiness, life satisfaction, “quality of life”) depend on surveys & personal interpretation
objective measurement is valuable for policymaking & economic analysis
gdp tracks changes over time very well
even if gdp is imperfect in level terms, it is especially useful for tracking growth & recessions
changes in gdp reliably indicate:
economic expansions
economic downturns
recoveries after crises
policymakers use gdp trends to decide on:
stimulus spending
interest rate changes
fiscal & monetary policy responses
common criticisms of gdp (and responses)
“gdp ignores inequality”
true, but gdp was never meant to measure distribution
inequality can be studied using separate tools (gini coefficient, income shares)
“gdp ignores unpaid work”
true, but including unpaid work would require subjective valuation
market-based measures remain clearer & more consistent
“gdp ignores environmental damage”
gdp measures production, not sustainability
environmental costs can be added through separate environmental accounts or regulations
why gdp should not be replaced
no alternative measure has matched gdp’s:
clarity
consistency
predictive usefulness
replacing gdp with a single “well-being index” would mix many value judgments into one number
gdp works best as a foundational measure, supplemented by other indicators
how gdp should be used
gdp should be treated as:
a core economic indicator
not a complete measure of human welfare
best practice is to pair gdp with:
inequality measures
health & education statistics
environmental indicators
misuse of gdp comes from overinterpreting it, not from the measure itself
beyond gdp
main argument
gdp is an important economic indicator but is inadequate as a measure of overall well-being
policymaking that focuses narrowly on gdp can lead to distorted priorities
societies should adopt broader metrics that reflect how people actually live & feel
limits of gdp as a measure
gdp measures market production, not quality of life
it ignores how income is distributed
rising gdp can coincide with stagnant or falling living standards for most people
it does not account for unpaid work
household labor, caregiving, & volunteer work are excluded
environmental degradation can increase gdp
cleanup after pollution raises gdp even though well-being declines
gdp treats “bads” as “goods”
spending due to crime, illness, or accidents increases gdp
disconnect between gdp growth & lived experience
in many advanced economies, gdp has grown while:
median wages stagnated
job insecurity increased
economic anxiety rose
people judge economic success by their own circumstances, not national averages
this gap fuels mistrust in institutions & economic policy
importance of distribution
well-being depends not just on total income, but on who receives it
inequality affects:
social cohesion
health outcomes
political stability
a dollar gained by a low-income household increases well-being more than a dollar gained by the wealthy
ignoring distribution leads to misleading conclusions about progress
health, education, & security as core components of well-being
good health is central to quality of life, independent of income
education affects:
future opportunities
civic participation
economic resilience
economic security matters
fear of unemployment or medical costs reduces well-being even if income is stable
gdp does not capture these dimensions adequately
environmental sustainability
current gdp ignores long-term environmental costs
growth that depletes natural resources undermines future well-being
climate change & ecological damage represent a failure of current metrics
true progress requires accounting for sustainability & intergenerational equity
subjective well-being
people’s own assessments of their lives provide valuable information
happiness & life-satisfaction data:
capture aspects of life missed by income statistics
reveal mental health & social stress
subjective measures should complement, not replace, objective indicators
alternative frameworks & indicators
well-being should be measured across multiple dimensions, including:
income & consumption
health
education
environmental quality
security
social connections
composite dashboards are preferred over a single index
this avoids hiding trade-offs behind one number
policy implications
what governments measure shapes what they prioritize
better metrics lead to:
more inclusive growth strategies
stronger social safety nets
greater focus on sustainability
measuring well-being improves democratic accountability
citizens can better judge whether policies improve their lives
overall conclusion
gdp remains useful for measuring economic activity
it should not be treated as a proxy for social progress
a shift toward well-being metrics allows for more accurate, humane, & forward-looking policymaking