pages 12 to 19
Background of the Naval Attack
Allies attempted to force their way through the Dardanelles before Anzacs arrived at Gallipoli.
18 warships were sent to attack Turkish forts.
Winston Churchill proposed the naval attack to support Russia against Germany.
Initial Strategy
The plan was to use the British Navy to send supplies to Russia, forcing Germany to divert troops.
The goal was to attack Constantinople, leading to a potential Turkish surrender.
Turkish Defense
Turks fortified their defenses, laid minefields, and prepared for the attack.
The naval attack began in February 1915 but faced significant challenges.
Results of the Naval Attack
On March 18, 1915, a fleet of 18 warships faced disaster, with three sinking and three disabled.
The attack was called off, boosting Turkish morale despite their ammunition depletion.
Decision to Send an Army
British War leaders decided to send an army to capture Gallipoli.
New Zealand and Australian soldiers were included in the plan.
Preparation for Landing
General Sir Ian Hamilton was in charge, criticized later for his leadership.
The landing was planned for April 23 but delayed to April 25 due to weather.
Landing Strategy
Troops were to land at multiple beaches, with diversions to mislead Turkish forces.
The Royal Naval Division created a distraction at Bulair.
Execution of the Landing
Anzacs began boarding warships on April 24, 1915.
Landings commenced after midnight, with staggered arrivals of Australian and New Zealand troops.
Challenges Faced
Turkish machine guns opened fire as soldiers landed, leading to heavy casualties.
The landing did not go as planned, with leaders considering evacuation.
Conditions on the Ground
The situation was dire, with many dead and wounded.
Anzacs faced harsh conditions, including cold weather and lack of food.
Overview of Landings
Allied landings occurred at various locations, including Cape Helles and Kum Kale.
The landings were chaotic, with mixed-up groups and unexpected challenges.
Landing Mistakes
Anzacs landed in the wrong location, leading to difficult terrain.
Casualties were high, with New Zealand losses estimated at 600-700 on the first day.
Environmental Impact
The area became a makeshift military base, with significant environmental degradation.
Supplies began to accumulate, but conditions remained harsh.
Turkish Perspective
Turks faced an invasion from foreign soldiers, with mixed feelings about their rulers.
Mustafa Kemal Bey emerged as a key leader, inspiring Turkish troops.
Turkish Army Conditions
The Turkish army faced shortages in supplies and morale challenges.
Despite difficulties, they maintained a reputation for fair fighting.
Reorganization of Troops
Anzac leaders reorganized landing groups for better coordination.
The area became known as Anzac Cove, a crucial military location.
Living Conditions
The Anzac area was poorly developed, lacking infrastructure.
Troops built temporary facilities and faced constant danger from enemy fire.
Cultural Impact
Anzac Cove became a symbol of bravery and sacrifice for New Zealand and Australia.
The legacy of the Anzac landing continues to resonate in both nations.
Blog Updates
Regular updates on the events and perspectives of the Gallipoli campaign are encouraged.
Research Tasks
Investigate the outcomes of the naval attack and the experiences of soldiers during the
Background of the Naval Attack
Allies attempted to force their way through the Dardanelles before Anzacs arrived at Gallipoli.
18 warships were sent to attack Turkish forts.
Winston Churchill proposed the naval attack to support Russia against Germany.
Initial Strategy
The plan was to use the British Navy to send supplies to Russia, forcing Germany to divert troops.
The goal was to attack Constantinople, leading to a potential Turkish surrender.
Turkish Defense
Turks fortified their defenses, laid minefields, and prepared for the attack.
The naval attack began in February 1915 but faced significant challenges.
Results of the Naval Attack
On March 18, 1915, a fleet of 18 warships faced disaster, with three sinking and three disabled.
The attack was called off, boosting Turkish morale despite their ammunition depletion.
Decision to Send an Army
British War leaders decided to send an army to capture Gallipoli.
New Zealand and Australian soldiers were included in the plan.
Preparation for Landing
General Sir Ian Hamilton was in charge, criticized later for his leadership.
The landing was planned for April 23 but delayed to April 25 due to weather.
Landing Strategy
Troops were to land at multiple beaches, with diversions to mislead Turkish forces.
The Royal Naval Division created a distraction at Bulair.
Execution of the Landing
Anzacs began boarding warships on April 24, 1915.
Landings commenced after midnight, with staggered arrivals of Australian and New Zealand troops.
Challenges Faced
Turkish machine guns opened fire as soldiers landed, leading to heavy casualties.
The landing did not go as planned, with leaders considering evacuation.
Conditions on the Ground
The situation was dire, with many dead and wounded.
Anzacs faced harsh conditions, including cold weather and lack of food.
Overview of Landings
Allied landings occurred at various locations, including Cape Helles and Kum Kale.
The landings were chaotic, with mixed-up groups and unexpected challenges.
Landing Mistakes
Anzacs landed in the wrong location, leading to difficult terrain.
Casualties were high, with New Zealand losses estimated at 600-700 on the first day.
Environmental Impact
The area became a makeshift military base, with significant environmental degradation.
Supplies began to accumulate, but conditions remained harsh.
Turkish Perspective
Turks faced an invasion from foreign soldiers, with mixed feelings about their rulers.
Mustafa Kemal Bey emerged as a key leader, inspiring Turkish troops.
Turkish Army Conditions
The Turkish army faced shortages in supplies and morale challenges.
Despite difficulties, they maintained a reputation for fair fighting.
Reorganization of Troops
Anzac leaders reorganized landing groups for better coordination.
The area became known as Anzac Cove, a crucial military location.
Living Conditions
The Anzac area was poorly developed, lacking infrastructure.
Troops built temporary facilities and faced constant danger from enemy fire.
Cultural Impact
Anzac Cove became a symbol of bravery and sacrifice for New Zealand and Australia.
The legacy of the Anzac landing continues to resonate in both nations.
Blog Updates
Regular updates on the events and perspectives of the Gallipoli campaign are encouraged.
Research Tasks
Investigate the outcomes of the naval attack and the experiences of soldiers during the