Microphone issue: Questions from students cannot be heard by classmates.
Instructor will repeat questions for clarity.
Announced by Brianna, India, and Melinda.
Importance of participating in elections to advocate for peers and represent interests.
Application deadline extended to next Friday at 11:59 PM.
QR code for applications available on Instagram and linked in their bio.
Open invitation for questions via Instagram or office visits.
Reminder for student organizations to send announcements via email.
Resuming the topic of terrorism as the final segment before the exam.
Instructor reflects on personal significance of 9/11 as a formative moment.
Discussed as a tactic involving the threat or use of violence against noncombatants to induce fear or intimidation.
Noted that definitions can vary based on perspective and politics.
The complexity of labeling individuals or groups as terrorists.
Introduced a concept distinguishing rational versus irrational acts in the context of terrorism.
Explained that rational behavior does not imply moral correctness; it simply refers to the subjective goal-oriented actions taken by actors.
Mentioned that terrorism can be seen as a strategic response by weak actors targeting strong states.
Extremism involves intense preferences held by a small and politically marginalized group.
Unpopular interests that drive individuals towards extreme measures.
Clarified that extremism is not inherently irrational.
Addressed the idea that terrorist actions are often planned based on perceived political goals.
Discussed the challenges of understanding terrorist motivations and the difficulties in counteracting terrorism systematically.
Mentioned that characteristics of terrorist organizations include decentralized cells and lack of strict hierarchy.
Highlighted distinctions between terrorism (targeting civilians) and insurgency (combatting military forces).
Demonstrated that terrorist tactics are intended to instill fear in the public rather than garner support.
Overview of strategies: coercion, provocation, spoiling, and posturing.
Explained that terrorism aims to threaten future violence as an intimidation strategy.
Discussed the idea of using violence to provoke governments into overreaction, alienating moderates.
Deterrence: Skeptical effectiveness, as terrorist groups can easily evade threats.
Preemption: Challenging due to the decentralized nature of terrorist cells.
Defensive Measures: Effective against direct attacks but costly and limited.
Criminalization: Difficult due to international cooperation issues and differing perceptions of terrorism.
Negotiation: Caution advised, as negotiations can legitimize extremist demands and lead to more groups adopting similar tactics.
Presents the argument that social bonds and personal ties motivate individuals more than ideological goals.
Seven puzzling tendencies of terrorists that highlight why these groups often engage in seemingly ineffective actions.
Social solidarity and personal connections can be underlying motives for involvement in terrorism.
Call for critical evaluation of motives behind terrorism and the effectiveness of counterterrorism strategies.
Emphasis on recognizing that the simplicity of labeling terrorist acts may overlook complexities and encourage further extremism.
Suggested that addressing social grievances and fostering inclusivity could reduce the appeal of extremist groups.
Encouragement to approach both the textbook's and new perspectives critically for comprehensive understanding.
Prepare to elaborate on both theories for the upcoming exam.