3.3 US Presidency
Head of State + Gov
article 2 section 1: constitutional right
oversees 15 Cabinet depts + EXOP
appoints approx 3000 federal posts
ambassadors, Cabinet, agencies, commissions + judges require Senate confirmation → Congress has more power?
‘serve at the president’s pleasure’ → argument for his power + extent e.g. appoints Commander in Chief → therefore more able to declare war than Congress? e.g. Obama Libya airstrikes
electoral mandate
1st 100 days
outweighed by Congress + party control
Presidential Mandates + Issues
Bush
Iraq + afghanistan War on Terror
9/11
Katarina
2008 crash
Obama
ACA
Budget Crisis
bin Laden
2013 shutdown
gun legislation (Sandy Hook)
Trump
wall + immigration
Russia connections + Comey firing
trillion dollar infrastructure plan
repeal ACA
Biden
immigration reversal
Covid response: American Rescue Plan 2021
economic stimulus + climate change (Inflation Reduction Act 2022)
bipartisan infrastructure bill: Infrastructure Investment + Jobs Act 2021
CHIPS Act: high tech manufacturing in-country
gun control bill ending boyfriend loophole
student loan forgiveness
ending Afghanistan + PACT Act for Veterans
executive orders
often based on Act of Congress e.g. White House Council on Native American Affairs
limits of falling inside exec remit, being scrutinised by court + public
Muslim Ban → court changed wording
national events
symbolic + linked to support e.g. Bush 9/11 v Katarina
can blow policy plans off course e.g. Obama ACA
cabinet
key policy advisors e.g. Cab Depts, VP
influential inner circle e.g. VP Biden ‘last guy in the room’ + drafted gun leg for Obama
Trump Immigration ban = divided cabinet; Sally Yates AG dismissed + key Depts not consulted
persuasion
Trump aggression v Obama conciliation
would Obama have been more effective in a Prime Ministerial role?
would be less constrained by Congress → leader of the largest party
presidential PMs = most transformative leaders
lead advisors in West Wing, alongside VP + Cabinet
key agencies: OMB, NSC + WHO
v powerful yet not many appointed by Senate
Roles
Policy advice
Manage P (Chief of Staff ‘lightning conductor’)
oversee depts
relations w Congress (Office for Legislative Affairs)
specialist functions
important council in close proximity to Oval Office
daily briefings from NSA → at odds w Sec State
Bannon appt = politicisation 2017
head confirmed by senate → const power to control purse of America
annual budget + dept spending
vital role for P power + macro econ
chief of staff gatekeeper
Biden’s: Ron Klein, now Jeff Zientes
spokes on a wheel: Clinton, less efficient, overseeing everything
pyramid
EXOP most powerful
VP
only const role is to be next in line
use determined by P
Biden is an opposing argument
Cabinet
no const role
limited collective power
individual advisors determined by P
John Kerry = opposing argument
EXOP
mostly P appointed
manage P schedule → influence
oversee dept spending → limitation on Cabinet
separation of powers
separate mandates (active) → Congress renews more frequently
no patronage
divided gov = conflicting agendas
agenda + legislation
P = driving force + ‘chief legislator’
veto
sign
speak
meet
national mandate e.g. Trump’s tv campaigning ensured policies were debated in Congress
C = only leg body w/ mandate
opposing C can set own agenda under a powerful speaker
Obama pressured by John Boehner midterm speaker to concede cuts due to gov shutdown over budget disagreements
similarly immigration package not debated
power to amend solely Congressional
votes + vetoes
P elected by ECV → less representative? e.g. Clinton lost out despite winning popular vote
P can veto bills → defeated by a supermajority
Overall, while the P is the figurehead and a key influential figure, the powers of Congress as a whole place strict limits on his power. He cannot amend legislation, and although he has the power to propose it, Congress has increasingly become more powerful due to the polarisation of politics and their ability to play on polling that reflects on the President personally. While the President has more short term power in terms of military
power to appoint → long term impact
little power following appointment
again Congress can override P e.g. Merrick Garland nom could have tipped ideological balance + was rejected due to ‘proximity to election’
verbal check on SCOTUS e.g. Obama criticism of Citizens United Ruling in State of the Union
Biden’s EO following Dobbs protecting access to reproductive rights
can’t do more + called on Congress to pass a fed. law
SCOTUS could overrule that w/ judicial review
extremely powerful institution
events
popularity
midterms
cycles + lame duck
Brown Notes:
look at relationships + limitations (imperial v imperilled)
president v federalism - both presidency + constitution
Head of State + Gov
article 2 section 1: constitutional right
oversees 15 Cabinet depts + EXOP
appoints approx 3000 federal posts
ambassadors, Cabinet, agencies, commissions + judges require Senate confirmation → Congress has more power?
‘serve at the president’s pleasure’ → argument for his power + extent e.g. appoints Commander in Chief → therefore more able to declare war than Congress? e.g. Obama Libya airstrikes
electoral mandate
1st 100 days
outweighed by Congress + party control
Presidential Mandates + Issues
Bush
Iraq + afghanistan War on Terror
9/11
Katarina
2008 crash
Obama
ACA
Budget Crisis
bin Laden
2013 shutdown
gun legislation (Sandy Hook)
Trump
wall + immigration
Russia connections + Comey firing
trillion dollar infrastructure plan
repeal ACA
Biden
immigration reversal
Covid response: American Rescue Plan 2021
economic stimulus + climate change (Inflation Reduction Act 2022)
bipartisan infrastructure bill: Infrastructure Investment + Jobs Act 2021
CHIPS Act: high tech manufacturing in-country
gun control bill ending boyfriend loophole
student loan forgiveness
ending Afghanistan + PACT Act for Veterans
executive orders
often based on Act of Congress e.g. White House Council on Native American Affairs
limits of falling inside exec remit, being scrutinised by court + public
Muslim Ban → court changed wording
national events
symbolic + linked to support e.g. Bush 9/11 v Katarina
can blow policy plans off course e.g. Obama ACA
cabinet
key policy advisors e.g. Cab Depts, VP
influential inner circle e.g. VP Biden ‘last guy in the room’ + drafted gun leg for Obama
Trump Immigration ban = divided cabinet; Sally Yates AG dismissed + key Depts not consulted
persuasion
Trump aggression v Obama conciliation
would Obama have been more effective in a Prime Ministerial role?
would be less constrained by Congress → leader of the largest party
presidential PMs = most transformative leaders
lead advisors in West Wing, alongside VP + Cabinet
key agencies: OMB, NSC + WHO
v powerful yet not many appointed by Senate
Roles
Policy advice
Manage P (Chief of Staff ‘lightning conductor’)
oversee depts
relations w Congress (Office for Legislative Affairs)
specialist functions
important council in close proximity to Oval Office
daily briefings from NSA → at odds w Sec State
Bannon appt = politicisation 2017
head confirmed by senate → const power to control purse of America
annual budget + dept spending
vital role for P power + macro econ
chief of staff gatekeeper
Biden’s: Ron Klein, now Jeff Zientes
spokes on a wheel: Clinton, less efficient, overseeing everything
pyramid
EXOP most powerful
VP
only const role is to be next in line
use determined by P
Biden is an opposing argument
Cabinet
no const role
limited collective power
individual advisors determined by P
John Kerry = opposing argument
EXOP
mostly P appointed
manage P schedule → influence
oversee dept spending → limitation on Cabinet
separation of powers
separate mandates (active) → Congress renews more frequently
no patronage
divided gov = conflicting agendas
agenda + legislation
P = driving force + ‘chief legislator’
veto
sign
speak
meet
national mandate e.g. Trump’s tv campaigning ensured policies were debated in Congress
C = only leg body w/ mandate
opposing C can set own agenda under a powerful speaker
Obama pressured by John Boehner midterm speaker to concede cuts due to gov shutdown over budget disagreements
similarly immigration package not debated
power to amend solely Congressional
votes + vetoes
P elected by ECV → less representative? e.g. Clinton lost out despite winning popular vote
P can veto bills → defeated by a supermajority
Overall, while the P is the figurehead and a key influential figure, the powers of Congress as a whole place strict limits on his power. He cannot amend legislation, and although he has the power to propose it, Congress has increasingly become more powerful due to the polarisation of politics and their ability to play on polling that reflects on the President personally. While the President has more short term power in terms of military
power to appoint → long term impact
little power following appointment
again Congress can override P e.g. Merrick Garland nom could have tipped ideological balance + was rejected due to ‘proximity to election’
verbal check on SCOTUS e.g. Obama criticism of Citizens United Ruling in State of the Union
Biden’s EO following Dobbs protecting access to reproductive rights
can’t do more + called on Congress to pass a fed. law
SCOTUS could overrule that w/ judicial review
extremely powerful institution
events
popularity
midterms
cycles + lame duck
Brown Notes:
look at relationships + limitations (imperial v imperilled)
president v federalism - both presidency + constitution