Ethical issues are inherent in all psychological research and must be addressed preemptively.
Researchers are obligated to uphold the dignity and welfare of participants as dictated by regulations and ethical guidelines.
The Health Professions Council of South Africa (HPCSA) provides a framework for ethical psychological practice.
Key Learning Goals:
Summarize major ethical principles governing psychological research.
Discuss controversies regarding the use of animals in research.
Participants must have the autonomy to decide whether to participate in a study.
Researchers cannot coerce or unduly influence participation; however, financial or material incentives may be offered, particularly for lengthy studies (e.g., longitudinal studies).
Incentives must be carefully structured to avoid coercion, particularly for participants from disadvantaged backgrounds.
Informed consent is crucial and entails a thorough understanding of participation requirements, not merely a signature.
It must be obtained freely, without coercion, and in understandable language tailored to participants, considering cultural diversity.
Participants should have the freedom to withdraw at any time without repercussions.
In cases involving minors or incapable adults, consent must also include assents from legal guardians.
Confidentiality ensures participant identity and responses are protected.
Explicit confidentiality involves clear communication of protective measures.
Implied confidentiality results from the researcher's actions, guaranteeing participant privacy.
Permission for recording or transmitting participant data is essential, with risks to privacy made clear before consent is obtained.
Debriefing occurs post-study and is meant to unveil any deception and clarify study hypotheses and results.
Although not necessary for all research types, it is critical when deception has been employed.
Researchers may withhold information about the study's true purpose, often to avoid behavior alterations affecting study validity.
Ethical clearance is challenging to obtain for deceptive studies, requiring assurance that no harm will come to participants.
Animals are often used in research for behavioral understanding or when human studies are impractical or unethical.
Controversies arise when animals endure harm or pain, prompting debates over their rights.
Critics argue animals deserve rights equivalent to humans and that many animal studies yield results that may not apply to human behavior.
Historical context shows initial legislation for animal testing emerged in response to unsafe product tests.
Some propose that advancements in technology (robotics, in vitro testing) could eliminate the need for animal testing.
Advocacy ranges from humane treatment to total opposition to animal testing, with large organisations like People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) having millions of members.
Estimates indicate hundreds of millions of animals are subjected to testing yearly; however, only a small percentage pertains to psychological studies, most of which do not involve pain.
Psychological research on animals has led to significant findings influencing treatment for various medical and psychological conditions.
The ethical discourse surrounding animal testing remains complex, and a growing awareness among psychologists is evident.