Observations of male-male competition and territoriality among lizards.
Larger males often are more successful in securing territories or mating opportunities.
Sexual Size Dimorphism in Reptiles
The chart showing sexual size dimorphism (SSD) patterns in turtles, lizards, and snakes, with significance markers for bias.
X-axis: Indicates degree of size dimorphism.
Y-axis: Specific species observations.
Left side: Male-biased size dimorphism (males larger).
Right side: Female-biased size dimorphism (females larger).
No markers: Indicates no significant size differences.
Most reptiles exhibit some bias toward either sex concerning body size at maturity.
Developmental Changes in Body Size
Plessed on Latticept (Broadheaded Skink):
Both sexes start similarly in growth but diverge at sexual maturity.
Males develop larger head widths due to testosterone effects.
Reproductive Patterns Based on Body Size
Example from Anulus carillonensis:
Data shows larger males mating with more females (up to 14) compared to smaller males (2-4).
Use of Scat in Behavioral Communication
Scat can be used for:
Individual recognition among neighboring reptiles.
Territorial marking, particularly among species like Plethodon cinereus that pile scat in communal areas.
Foraging Ecology Overview
Focus on dietary habits: understanding what herbivorous reptiles eat and how they capture prey.
General guideline for most reptiles: they eat anything that fits in their mouths.
Herbivores significantly impact prey populations and food webs, especially in warmer environments.
Dietary Habits by Reptile Groups
Caecilians: Predominantly earthworms and invertebrates.
Frogs and Salamanders: Mainly insects, occasionally small vertebrates.
Crocodilians: Consume various vertebrates including mammals and fish.
Turtles: Omnivorous; eat plants and animals.
Squamates (lizards, snakes): Dietary habits correlate with body size; larger species tend to eat vertebrates.
Exceptions in Herbivory
Certain lizard taxa, including Iguanidae and Leiolopididae, exhibit herbivorous behavior.
Smaller-bodied species such as southern South American lizards may feed on fruits and flowers, especially in low-energy environments.
Foraging Modes
Categorization of Predators:
Sit and Wait Predators (Ambush):
Minimal energy spent looking for prey; rely on prey abundance.
Types: e.g., Alligator snapping turtles use a lure for prey.
Advantages: Efficient energy use but risk fewer opportunities.
Active Foragers:
Move to find prey; utilize visual and chemical cues.
Increased vulnerability to predation.
Sit and Pursue: A debated category where predators ambush until prey is within reach before chasing.
Optimal Foraging Theory
Animals should maximize energy gained from prey for efficiency.
Many animals do not forage optimally due to:
Environmental uncertainties and conflicting demands.
Reproductive and predation risks.
Evidence suggests when food is scarce, animals will diversify their diet more than when food is abundant.
Differences in Foraging Behavior
Specific studies indicate sexual dimorphism in foraging behaviors. For instance, male Acrochordus arafuri actively searches shallow water for small fish, while females ambush larger fish in deeper waters.
Factors affecting foraging behavior:
Foraging mode, sensory capabilities, body size, biomechanics, and time of day.