Key Concepts with Civil Liberties
Civil rights— The government’s collective decisions on the treatment of individuals
Civil liberties— Restrictions on the government
Civil rights protect individuals from discrimination based on certain characteristics; these rights are guaranteed to all citizens under the due process and equal protection clause of the US Constitution as well as acts of Congress
Civil liberties
Protections of citizens from improper national government actions (but not state government)
Substantive— Limits what the government has the power to do
Cannot create state religion, quartering troops, eminent domain (government takes property and pays compensation)
Procedural— Addresses how the government should act
Key points:
Dual citizenship— you are a citizen of the US and your state
Barron v Baltimore— the 5th Amendment protects citizens from the national government, but not state governments
Bill of Rights only pertains to the national government
Slaughterhouse Cases— narrow interpretation of the 13th and 14th Amendments
Strict scrutiny— The government needs a strong, extremely specific, and narrow reason to limit free speech, the law restricting speech must be the least restrictive to free speech.
Speech is defined very broadly by the courts
Speech plus (speech plus conduct)— Expressive speech such as demonstrations, handing out leaflets, sit-ins
Symbolic speech— Expressive action that represents speech/political speech such as flag-burning
Defamation of character (except in the case of famous people)
“Clear and present danger” (public welfare)
Schenck v United States (likely to be bad)
Debs v United States (praising draft dodgers)
Abrams v United States (leaflets inciting protests, strikes)
Gitlow v New York (incorporation of speech)
“Imminent danger” (public safety/shouting fire)
Brandenburg v Ohio (KKK member advocated for the overthrow of the government)
“Fighting words”
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
Mass media including press, radio, and television
Prior restraint (censorship)
Shield laws— protects reporters’ sources
National Security
Obscenity is not protected
Prohibits the establishment of one or more official religions
Prevents the federal government from restricting an individual’s right to practice or not practice religion
Previously: Lemon v Kurtzman decided that government money could go to religious organizations as long as it was:
For a secular, legislative purpose (ex. transportation to a religious school)
The primary effect does not advance or inhibit religion (a religious school can apply for a grant to buy math textbooks, but not a religious textbook)
It does not foster an excessive entanglement with religion
June 2022: Kennedy v Bremerton
Kennedy was fired for having a prayer at football games
SCOTUS ruled that it was a free exercise of religion and speech
Overturned Lemon
Must be peaceable
Deals with public places
Rules (reasonable and fair to everybody)
Heckler’s Veto (actions of the crowd prevent a person/group from exercising free speech)
District of Columbia v Heller— Struck down DC ban on handguns, federal jurisdiction
McDonald v Chicago— Struck down Chicago ban on handguns, incorporation of 2nd Amendment
A search warrant for a specific item is needed by the government
Exceptions:
Person and “Stop and Frisk”— needs reasonable suspicion and probably cause
Home searches are legal if…
Hot pursuit
Exigent circumstances
Consent
Automobile searches are legal if…
Probable cause (ex. driving erratically)
Mobility
Guidelines for determining violations
Was the search conducted by a private individual or a government official?
Is the person claiming that their rights are violated or someone else’s?
Was the contraband in plain sight?
Was the invalid warrant obtained in good faith?
Does the contraband fall under the exclusionary rule?
All people are treated fairly under the law
Innocent until proven guilty
Grand jury for a capital crime
Freedom from double jeopardy or self incrimination
Eminent domain— the government can take property for a public purpose and must compensate
Speedy and public trial
Usually within 100 days or to the benefit of the accused
Impartial Jury
Informed of charges
Right to confront witnesses (subpoena)
Right to Council (right to an attorney)
Bail based on crime and ability to pay
No cruel and unusual punishment
No barbarity
Punishment must fit the crime
Guarantees due process at the state level
The Bill of Rights pertainsto the federal government
Civil rights— The government’s collective decisions on the treatment of individuals
Civil liberties— Restrictions on the government
Civil rights protect individuals from discrimination based on certain characteristics; these rights are guaranteed to all citizens under the due process and equal protection clause of the US Constitution as well as acts of Congress
Civil liberties
Protections of citizens from improper national government actions (but not state government)
Substantive— Limits what the government has the power to do
Cannot create state religion, quartering troops, eminent domain (government takes property and pays compensation)
Procedural— Addresses how the government should act
Key points:
Dual citizenship— you are a citizen of the US and your state
Barron v Baltimore— the 5th Amendment protects citizens from the national government, but not state governments
Bill of Rights only pertains to the national government
Slaughterhouse Cases— narrow interpretation of the 13th and 14th Amendments
Strict scrutiny— The government needs a strong, extremely specific, and narrow reason to limit free speech, the law restricting speech must be the least restrictive to free speech.
Speech is defined very broadly by the courts
Speech plus (speech plus conduct)— Expressive speech such as demonstrations, handing out leaflets, sit-ins
Symbolic speech— Expressive action that represents speech/political speech such as flag-burning
Defamation of character (except in the case of famous people)
“Clear and present danger” (public welfare)
Schenck v United States (likely to be bad)
Debs v United States (praising draft dodgers)
Abrams v United States (leaflets inciting protests, strikes)
Gitlow v New York (incorporation of speech)
“Imminent danger” (public safety/shouting fire)
Brandenburg v Ohio (KKK member advocated for the overthrow of the government)
“Fighting words”
Chaplinsky v New Hampshire
Mass media including press, radio, and television
Prior restraint (censorship)
Shield laws— protects reporters’ sources
National Security
Obscenity is not protected
Prohibits the establishment of one or more official religions
Prevents the federal government from restricting an individual’s right to practice or not practice religion
Previously: Lemon v Kurtzman decided that government money could go to religious organizations as long as it was:
For a secular, legislative purpose (ex. transportation to a religious school)
The primary effect does not advance or inhibit religion (a religious school can apply for a grant to buy math textbooks, but not a religious textbook)
It does not foster an excessive entanglement with religion
June 2022: Kennedy v Bremerton
Kennedy was fired for having a prayer at football games
SCOTUS ruled that it was a free exercise of religion and speech
Overturned Lemon
Must be peaceable
Deals with public places
Rules (reasonable and fair to everybody)
Heckler’s Veto (actions of the crowd prevent a person/group from exercising free speech)
District of Columbia v Heller— Struck down DC ban on handguns, federal jurisdiction
McDonald v Chicago— Struck down Chicago ban on handguns, incorporation of 2nd Amendment
A search warrant for a specific item is needed by the government
Exceptions:
Person and “Stop and Frisk”— needs reasonable suspicion and probably cause
Home searches are legal if…
Hot pursuit
Exigent circumstances
Consent
Automobile searches are legal if…
Probable cause (ex. driving erratically)
Mobility
Guidelines for determining violations
Was the search conducted by a private individual or a government official?
Is the person claiming that their rights are violated or someone else’s?
Was the contraband in plain sight?
Was the invalid warrant obtained in good faith?
Does the contraband fall under the exclusionary rule?
All people are treated fairly under the law
Innocent until proven guilty
Grand jury for a capital crime
Freedom from double jeopardy or self incrimination
Eminent domain— the government can take property for a public purpose and must compensate
Speedy and public trial
Usually within 100 days or to the benefit of the accused
Impartial Jury
Informed of charges
Right to confront witnesses (subpoena)
Right to Council (right to an attorney)
Bail based on crime and ability to pay
No cruel and unusual punishment
No barbarity
Punishment must fit the crime
Guarantees due process at the state level
The Bill of Rights pertainsto the federal government