Introduction
Questioning Paradigms: Perception of Space, GDP, and Census
Formal Work Sector: Women, Virus, and Woes
Informal Work Sector: Women, Virus, and Woes
Way Forward
Bibliography
Title: Gendering Work from Home: An Analysis of the Visible and Invisible Women Workforce in the Wake of the COVID-19 Pandemic
Author: Avishi Gupta
The concept of remote work emerged during the pandemic as a new normal.
Work-from-home has historical roots in gender dynamics and domestic responsibilities.
The view of home as a workplace predates the pandemic, driven by patriarchal norms.
Women face distinct employment realities based on formal vs. informal sectors, influenced by race, caste, class.
Unpaid labor: Women are predominant in unpaid family work (60%) and domestic work (98%).
Paid vs. unpaid work: A stark differentiation exists, worsened by pandemic-induced shifts.
Law and policies consider home as personal—exclusion of this space in labor discussions.
Feminist critique: Personal is political; absence of regulation over home labor leads to exploitation.
Women’s unpaid care work vital for societal economy, often overlooked.
National Census includes unpaid farm and family enterprise labor, but focuses on market-oriented definitions.
Women’s effective roles are underestimated in GDP and census data, obscuring reality of economic contributions.
Defining Worker: Census definitions favor market-driven economies, neglecting the informal and unwaged contributions of women.
Snapshot of female employment trends through census data (1981-2011).
Huge impact of the COVID-19 pandemic: 24.4% dip in GDP with increased poverty levels.
Pandemic exacerbated gender disparities in health and socio-economic realms.
Health crisis linked closely with women who represent 70% of healthcare workers.
Blurred boundaries: Increased domestic responsibilities disrupt women’s formal employment.
Statistics show significant job loss among women versus men post-lockdown.
Direct correlation of pandemic responsibilities with increased domestic violence.
Existing policies inadequately address domestic violence issues intertwined with remote work.
Expansion of legal protections is necessary to cover workplace harassment in non-traditional workspaces.
Government initiatives like PMJDY failed to reach many women due to lack of accounts, and relief is minimal at Rs. 500/month.
Women in informal work sectors significantly impacted: 60% income loss, with many losing jobs outright.
Women dominate informal sectors (80% in domestic roles); faced immediate job loss due to stigma and health concerns.
Caste discrimination worsened employment situations for sanitation workers during the pandemic.
Underrepresentation in official data leads to neglect of women's economic contributions.
Call for policies to include informal and unpaid labor in national assessments.
Problems of remittances impacted household consumption; reliance on women increased during economic downturns.
Women's workdays under MGNREGS declined amid growing domestic responsibilities.
The need for robust data that reflects women's multifaceted roles in the economy.
Legislative reforms required to safeguard women's employment and address domestic labor issues.
Highlighting the importance of addressing gender inequality in disaster response efforts.
Emphasis on promoting women's roles in diverse economic zones, especially in larger industries.
Advocacy for a national policy focused on the welfare of domestic workers, securing their rights and protections.
Comprehensive list of referenced works highlighting issues associated with women and work in the context of the pandemic.