Instructor: Christos Zois (Teaching Assistant & PhD Candidate, Sciences Po School of Law)
Date: 10 March 2025
Mid-term exams housekeeping
Law as an autonomous system (Session 1)
Law beyond legal rules (Session 2)
The crafts of law (Session 3)
Law and the State (Session 4)
Constitutionalism (Session 5)
Format: 10 questions – multiple choice
Notes: More than one correct answer possible
Duration: 30 minutes in-class
Law as a Social Phenomenon: Variants in interpretation by different theorists:
O.W. Holmes: Law determined by court rulings rather than abstract reasoning.
H. Kelsen: Law as a system of prescribed norms governing human behavior.
R. Pound: Law seen as a human construct shaped by operational norms.
Focus on complexities of social interactions, studying law through:
Discursive analysis: Understanding law as language and practice.
Legal agents: The role of professionals within society (judges, lawyers).
Ideological power: Examining law through critical lenses like feminist and ecological perspectives.
K. Marx: Law reflects bourgeois interests, supporting capitalism.
E. Durkheim: Law binds society and emerges from industrial development.
M. Weber: Bureaucratic law reflects rationality of Western capitalist ethos.
Nature of Law: Communicative institution involving human action.
Functions of Law: Social order maintenance, conflict mediation, regulation of behavior, political power allocation.
Specialization and recognition of skills within legal practice.
Influences of law practice dynamics and interaction with practitioners.
Autopoietic System: Law stabilizes societal expectations by serving as a bridge between social events.
Critique of both formalism and instrumentalism in law.
Juridical Field: Social competition for legal definitions and representations.
Power dynamics determined by legal professionals and their roles in society.
Control over education and access to legal practice.
Corporate Legal Practice: Shift towards bureaucratic specialization.
Personal Legal Practice: Ranges from traditional to boutique firms.
Impact of AI and mass production on the legal profession.
Historical Context: Transition from feudal systems to modern states; significance of taxation and urban governance.
Sovereignty Development: Integration of state authority and individual political participation post-Westphalia.
Public International Law regulates state interactions and embodies human rights principles.
Dynamic relationship between law, popular sovereignty, and rights recognition.
Evolution of constitutional frameworks and their societal impact.
Transconstitutionalism: Interaction between various jurisdictions on common legal issues, e.g., climate change litigation.
Constitutions as foundational instruments reflecting societal values and the necessity for adherence to rights.
Law and society operate in a complex dance where each influences the other in profound ways. Let's break this down with some juicy details. First up, there’s the idea of law as an autonomous system. Some theorists argue that law isn't just about rules written down somewhere; it’s a living, breathing entity shaped by real-life court rulings. O.W. Holmes famously viewed law as being determined more by what judges decide than any preordained set of rules. Pretty wild, right? Then we have H. Kelsen, who puts forward the law as a system of norms that dictate human behavior. And there's R. Pound, seeing law as a human construct molded by the society's operational norms. It’s like everyone’s agreeing on the rules to keep the peace, but those rules are debated and defined by societal needs and pressures. By the way, let’s not overlook the impact of ideology in law. Critical lenses like feminism or ecological perspectives challenge us to think about how law isn't neutral; it reflects power dynamics in society. For instance, K. Marx argued that laws serve bourgeois interests, upholding capitalism – talk about a power play! We can’t leave out E. Durkheim and M. Weber, who add more spice to the blend. Durkheim believed law binds society together, essential for the social order, especially as industrial development increases. Weber, meanwhile, introduced us to how bureaucratic law reflects Western rationality - it’s like law wearing a business suit and carrying a briefcase. Now, turn your attention to the legal profession. The sociology of legal practitioners shows how specialization has gone to new heights, with the rise of corporate legal practices and the entry of AI in the field. This shift brings a whole new flavor to legal work and influences how legal agents operate. Lastly, the interaction of law with the state and constitutionalism is a real blockbuster! The emergence of state authority influenced by historical transitions, sovereignty, and public international law has everyone on the edge of their seats. And constitutionalism? It’s the evolving relationship between law, the spirit of the people, and the recognition of rights - a drama that shapes society every single day. In summary, understanding law's interplay with society reveals a tangled web of interests, ideologies, and power plays, painting a vivid picture of how society governs itself and adapts over time. It’s like law and society are in a never-ending soap opera, full of twists, reforms, and the occasional scandal.
Here are some key terms to focus on from the Law and Society overview:
Law as an Autonomous System: Understanding law as an independent entity shaped by social factors.
Judicial Rulings: The influence of court decisions on the interpretation of law (O.W. Holmes).
Normative System: H. Kelsen's view of law as a system of prescribed norms governing behavior.
Human Construct: R. Pound's idea that law is shaped by human actions and norms.
Ideological Perspectives: Examination of law through critical lenses (e.g., feminism, ecology) that reveal power dynamics.
Bourgeois Interests: K. Marx's concept that law serves the interests of the wealthy and supports capitalism.
Social Cohesion: E. Durkheim's belief that law binds society together and emerges from social development.
Bureaucratic Law: M. Weber's perspective that law reflects rational and bureaucratic structures of society.
Legal Profession: The study of how legal workers specialize and interact within the legal field.
Constitutionalism: The relationship between law, popular sovereignty, and the recognition of rights.
Transconstitutionalism: Interaction among jurisdictions on shared legal issues, such as climate change.
These terms highlight the major concepts and theories that shape the study of law and its relationship with society.
O.W. Holmes
Importance: Argued that law is not just about written rules but is significantly influenced by court decisions. His perspective emphasizes the role of judges and the judicial system in shaping the law as a living entity.
H. Kelsen
Importance: Proposed that law functions as a system of norms that regulate human behavior. His ideas help establish a theoretical foundation for understanding legal systems as structured frameworks.
R. Pound
Importance: Viewed law as a human construct molded by society’s practices and needs. He highlighted the dynamic nature of law, emphasizing that it evolves with societal changes.
K. Marx
Importance: Critiqued how legal systems serve the interests of the wealthy, thereby supporting capitalism. His insights are crucial for understanding the ideological implications of law and its role in perpetuating social inequalities.
E. Durkheim
Importance: Emphasized that law serves to bind society together and reflects social development. His work is fundamental in exploring the relationship between law and social cohesion.
M. Weber
Importance: Analyzed law through the lens of bureaucracy and rationality. His perspective is vital for understanding how modern legal systems function within capitalist societies.
K. Llewellyn
Importance: Focused on the communicative aspects of law and its functions in society. He contributed to the understanding of law beyond strict rules, considering its social implications.
P. Bourdieu
Importance: Critiqued formalist views of law and examined power dynamics within the legal field. His work is important for analyzing the social competition surrounding legal definitions.
N. Luhmann
Importance: Developed the concept of law as an autopoietic system, illustrating how law stabilizes societal expectations by maintaining its own boundaries and structures.
These individuals have significantly shaped legal theories and our understanding of the relationship between law and society. Their diverse perspectives contribute to a comprehensive view of how law operates and evolves within various social contexts.