Discussion of Freud, Personal Space, Deformity, Deviance, and Crime: Understanding these concepts is pivotal as they inform subsequent discussions and analyses in the course, especially before the midterm.
Preview of Upcoming Documentary: Bowling for Columbine
Freud's Theories on Speech and the Unconscious:
Analyzes "slips of the tongue" (parapraxes) as not random but rather as revelations of unconscious desires.
Example: Mentioning an ex-partner while with a current partner can indicate repressed feelings toward the former.
Freud asserts that unconscious motivations often dominate conscious thoughts, leading to errors in speech. This concept suggests that despite our efforts to control our expressions, true feelings often inadvertently surface.
Zones of Personal Space:
Personal space is an unconscious boundary that differs across cultures and situations, impacting interpersonal interactions.
Discussion of how individuals express discomfort or disinterest in confined spaces, like elevators, exemplifying the need for personal space.
Four Zones of Personal Space Defined:
Intimate Distance: Up to 1.5 feet. Reserved for significant others and close family, where bodily contact is expected.
Personal Distance: 1.5 to 4 feet. Common among friends and acquaintances, allowing limited bodily contact.
Social Distance: 4 to 12 feet. Used in formal interactions, preserving professionalism and structure.
Public Distance: 12 feet and beyond. Suitable for public speaking or performances, ensuring a clear distinction between audience and speaker.
Variability in Personal Space:
Personal space can vary substantially due to cultural norms; some societies may accept closer proximities, while others maintain strict boundaries.
Recognition of these differences is crucial for cultural adaptation, particularly for immigrants navigating new social norms.
Concepts of Deviance and Crime:
Deviance is defined as nonconformity to social norms recognized by a significant portion of society. Not all deviant acts are classified as criminal—for instance, unconventional fashion choices might be seen as deviant but not necessarily illegal.
Understanding deviance is essential as it serves a functional purpose in society, aiding in the establishment of norms and social cohesion.
Sanctions Play a Role in Maintaining Norms:
Formal Sanctions: Punishments or rewards enacted by established institutions (e.g., law enforcement, educational systems).
Informal Sanctions: Social reactions that are spontaneous and not governed by formal rules (e.g., disapproval from peers).
Emile Durkheim on Deviance:
Suggests deviance is integral to societal cohesion, allowing societies to clarify acceptable behavior.
Deviant subcultures can exemplify groups that operate outside societal norms yet may lead to social change through their actions and activism.
Sociological Theories on Crime:
General consensus acknowledges that crime cannot simply be attributed to individual characteristics; it is influenced heavily by larger societal structures and cultural norms.
Learned Deviance - Differential Association Theory:
Proposed by Edwin Sutherland, this theory posits that deviance is learned through social interactions, particularly within peer groups.
Differential Association emphasizes the balance between conforming and deviant influences in one’s social circle. A higher number of deviant peers increases the likelihood of adopting those behaviors.
Structural Strain Theory - Anomie:
Developed by Robert Merton, this theory explains crime as rooted in societal pressures and the difficulty in achieving culturally mandated success.
Anomie describes a sense of normlessness that leads individuals to feel aimless and disconnected from societal goals, often breeding frustration and subsequent criminal behavior.
Economic inequality is identified as a major catalyst for crime, as disparities in opportunity can foster feelings of resentment and desperation.
Reactions to Strain: Merton categorizes responses to the mismatch between societal goals and available means:
Conformist: Accepts both the goals and means of society.
Innovator: Accepts societal goals but rejects the means, often turning to crime (e.g., drug dealing).
Ritualist: Rejects societal goals but accepts the means, leading to a sense of fulfillment in routine despite a lack of ambition.
Retreatist: Rejects both goals and means, often withdrawing from society (e.g., substance abusers).
Rebel: Seeks to replace both goals and means, typically through radical change or activism.
Conclusion: Discussions surrounding conformity, deviance, and societal boundaries will continue in future classes. Emphasis will be placed on the cyclical interplay between individual behavior, social norms, and overall societal structure.
Knowt
Note
Studied by 6 people
