11. Raja et al. 2020
Introduction
- Pain: an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage or described in terms of such damage
Pro and con arguments for updating the IASP definition
- Although tissue injury is a common antecedent to pain, pain can be present even when tissue damage is not discernible
- Different definitions of pain
- Criticisms:
- Redundant
- Outdated
- Lacks precision
Pain
- Pain: an aversive sensory and emotional experience typically caused by, or resembling that caused by, actual or potential tissue injury
Notes
- Pain is always a subjective experience that is influenced to varying degrees by biological, psychological, and social factors
- Pain and nociception are different phenomena: the experience of pain cannot be reduced to activity in sensory pathways
- Through their life experiences, individuals learn the concept of pain and its applications
- A person’s report of an experience as pain should be accepted as such and respected
- Although pain usually serves an adaptive role, it may have adverse effects on function and social and psychological well-being
- Verbal description is only one of several behaviours to express pain; inability to communicate does not negate the possibility that a human or a nonhuman animal experiences pain
Potential benefits of this new definition
- Creation of a chronic pain classification: ICD-11
- A revised definition of pain is very timely and aligns with current efforts to advance ontological frameworks within which pain resides
- We must recognize pain as an important health condition and this will transform pain research and the care of persons with pain worldwide