SP

Optimization Problems & 5-Step Solution Method

Optimization Problems Overview

  • Optimization seeks the absolute maximum or minimum of a quantity.
    • Absolute (global) extrema = highest/lowest values a function can attain.
    • In real‐world models we seldom study a function “in a vacuum.”
  • Typical goals:
    • Maximize profits, speed, enclosed area, efficiency, revenue.
    • Minimize cost, material usage, waste, loss, decay rate.
  • Clues in problem wording: “best,” “least,” “most,” “fastest,” “slowest,” “highest,” “lowest,” “maximum,” “minimum.” The presence of superlatives → likely an optimization setup.
  • Optimization problems are usually constrained: limited resources, fixed budgets, physical bounds, etc.
  • Core calculus connection: extrema are found by locating critical points of a function (derivative =0 or undefined) and checking endpoints when the domain is closed.

5-Step Strategy for Solving Optimization Problems

  1. Identify Quantities & Restrictions
    • List every relevant measurable quantity.
    • Pin down explicit constraints (length of wire, budget cap, physical laws, …).
    • Decide which single quantity you must optimize (area, volume, cost,…).
  2. Choose Independent Variables
    • Select variables allowed to vary freely.
    • Typical independent variables: lengths, widths, production levels, time, temperature.
    • Non-controllable figures (e.g., unit price of materials) are parameters rather than variables.
  3. Write Relationships
    • Use geometry, physics, chemistry, economics, or problem-supplied formulas.
    • Express every quantity (including constraints) in terms of the chosen variables.
  4. Form a Single-Variable Function & Domain
    • Substitute constraints to eliminate extra variables, ending with one variable.
    • Determine an appropriate domain (usually closed interval):
      • Physical realism: lengths \ge0, masses \ge0.
      • Constraint substitution may bound the variable.
  5. Apply Calculus to Find Extrema
    • Compute derivative; set f'(x)=0 (critical numbers) or note where f'(x) undefined.
    • Evaluate objective function at:
    1. Each critical number within the domain.
    2. Each domain endpoint.
    • Pick the largest (or smallest) resulting value, according to the problem.

Worked Example: Rectangular Garden Using a Building Wall

Problem Recap

  • Couple owns 100 m of wire fencing.
  • Fence will form three sides of a rectangle; the fourth side is an existing building (no fence needed there).
  • Objective: maximize enclosed area.

Step 1 – Quantities & Restriction

  • Quantities:
    • Fence side along the building → no material.
    • Remaining three sides → two equal widths x and one length y.
    • Area to maximize: A.
  • Constraint: available fencing = 100\text{ m}.

Step 2 – Independent Variables

  • Choose widths x and length y as independent.
  • Area A depends on these choices.

Step 3 – Relationships

  1. Geometric area
    A = x\,y
  2. Fencing (perimeter of unfenced rectangle sides)
    100 = 2x + y

Step 4 – Single-Variable Function & Domain

  • Solve the constraint for one variable, e.g.
    y = 100 - 2x
  • Substitute into area formula:
    A(x) = x(100 - 2x) = 100x - 2x^2
  • Domain: physical lengths x, y \ge 0.
    • x \ge 0.
    • y=100-2x \ge 0 \implies 0 \le x \le 50.
    • Therefore x \in [0,50].

Step 5 – Optimization via Calculus

  1. Derivative:
    A'(x) = 100 - 4x
  2. Critical number:
    A'(x)=0 \Rightarrow 100-4x=0 \Rightarrow x=25
  3. Evaluate A(x) at critical number and endpoints:
    • x=0:\; A=100(0)-2(0)^2=0
    • x=25:\; A=100(25)-2(25)^2 = 2500 - 1250 = 1250\text{ m}^2
    • x=50:\; A=100(50)-2(50)^2 = 5000 - 5000 = 0
  4. Absolute maximum = 1250\text{ m}^2 at x=25\text{ m},\; y=100-2(25)=50\text{ m}.

Interpretation & Plausibility Checks

  • Endpoint areas are 0 because choosing x=0 (no width) or x=50 (no length) degenerates the garden.
  • The optimal shape uses half the fence for the long side (50 m) and splits the remaining half equally (25 m each) for the two widths.
  • This matches intuitive patterns: for rectangles with a given perimeter, a more “square-ish” shape maximizes area. The building side plays the role of the fourth 50 m.

Connections, Insights, & Broader Principles

  • Many optimization problems reduce to turning a multi-variable situation into a single-variable calculus problem through substitution.
  • Constraints provide necessary linkage; without them the quantity often has no finite maximum or minimum (e.g.
    unlimited fence → unbounded area).
  • Always interpret endpoints physically. Zero area at an endpoint often reveals a degenerate configuration.
  • The geometric idea that, for fixed perimeter, a square maximizes area leads here to a rectangle with the side ratio y : x = 2 : 1 because only three sides consume perimeter.
  • Method adapts easily to:
    • Minimizing cost with different material prices (introduce separate cost coefficients in the perimeter equation).
    • Volume problems (boxes without tops, etc.).
    • Time/velocity trade-offs in physics.

Ethical & Practical Implications Mentioned

  • Resource limitations (only 100 m of fence) are realistic constraints; ignoring them could waste material or money.
  • Optimization helps households/businesses use materials efficiently, reducing environmental impact of excess production.

Numerical, Algebraic, & Calculus Highlights

  • Constraint equation: 100 = 2x + y linear in two variables.
  • Objective function after substitution: quadratic A(x)=100x-2x^2.
  • Derivative zero gives critical point x=25.
  • Closed interval [0,50] ensures Extreme Value Theorem applies → guaranteed absolute max/min.

Key Takeaways for Exam Preparation

  • Memorize the 5-step framework; practice mapping word descriptions to variables & equations.
  • Clearly distinguish between independent variables, parameters, constraints, and objective function.
  • Look for physical bounds to craft a closed domain; do not rely solely on algebraic domain.
  • Derivative test + endpoint checks = reliable method for 1-variable absolute extrema.
  • Interpret final answers contextually (units, feasibility, reasonableness).