The History in Our Genes
The History in Our Genes
Students’ Learning Objectives
- Describe different types of DNA segments evolve at different rates
- Explain the importance of selecting appropriate genetic material for molecular clock studies
- In estimating divergence time
- Describe the use of dN/dS for testing natural selection
Molecular Clock Concept
- Different types of DNA segments evolve at different rates
- Pseudogenes
- Evolve faster than non-synonymous sites in protein coding genes
- Do not contribute to an organism’s fitness, leading to higher tolerance for mutations
- Synonymous Sites
- Also known as silent mutations
- Typically evolve faster compared to nonsynonymous sites because these mutations usually do not affect protein function
- Nonsynonymous Sites
- Evolve more slowly because most amino-acid-changing mutations are deleterious
- Selection processes eliminate these harmful mutations from the population
- Pseudogenes
Selection of Genetic Material for Molecular Clock Studies
Importance of selecting the appropriate genetic material
- To measure divergence time of species separated by hundreds of millions of years:
- A slow-evolving segment of DNA is required for accuracy
- Fast evolving genes may experience more substitutions at a site over time, leading to substitution saturation
- Substitution saturation results in misleading nucleotide difference estimates
- To measure divergence time of species separated by hundreds of millions of years:
Estimating shorter divergence time
- Faster evolving genes are necessary
- Slower evolving genes may not have accumulated any mutations since the divergence effectively occurred recently
- Faster evolving genes are necessary
Determining the Origins of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)
HIV Classification
- Belongs to the group known as lentiviruses
- Lentiviruses can infect various mammals, including cats, horses, and primates
- HIV is most closely related to Simian Immunodeficiency Virus (SIV) that infects monkeys and apes
Origin Details of HIV
- HIV-1 Groups M and N
- Both evolved from a subspecies of chimpanzee, P. t. troglodytes
- HIV-1 Groups O and P
- SIV jumped from chimpanzees to gorillas, followed by an adaptation process in gorillas
- Represents two independent animal-to-human transmission events
- HIV-1 Groups M and N
dN/dS Testing for Natural Selection
Understanding dN/dS
- The ratio compares the number of nonsynonymous substitutions per nonsynonymous site (denoted as dN) to the number of synonymous substitutions per synonymous site (denoted as dS)
- A pseudogene is non-functional regarding coding; hence selection cannot act on mutations it acquires
- Under neutral evolution (no selection present):
- dN = dS (the number of nonsynonymous substitutions equals the number of synonymous substitutions)
Testing for Evidence of Selection
- Neutral evolution is rejected if nonsynonymous and synonymous substitutions do not occur equally
- For a gene under positive selection:
- Beneficial alleles become fixed faster than synonymous alleles
- Resulting in more nonsynonymous mutations relative to synonymous mutations
- dN > dS indicates positive selection
Natural Selection Dynamics
- Genes may produce proteins that lose functionality if a single amino acid is altered
- Natural Selection (also known as purifying selection or negative selection) removes harmful mutations lowering fitness
- Synonymous mutations, however, remain unaffected as they do not alter protein functionality, thereby allowing them to frequently occur
- Resulting in dS > dN
Example Question on dN/dS Ratio
- If strong positive selection occurs in a gene, the resulting dN/dS ratio will show:
- More synonymous mutations than expected
- More nonsynonymous mutations than expected
- An equal number of synonymous and nonsynonymous mutations
- Positive selection cannot be detected by comparing dN to dS.