Competition is an interaction with negative effects between two individuals depending on the same limiting resource.
Intraspecific competition: competition within the same species, related to density-dependent population growth.
Interspecific competition: competition among individuals of different species.
Understanding competition is crucial as it organizes ecological processes that control the composition of natural communities.
Applications of competition concepts extend to the management of agriculture, forests, wildlife, and natural resources.
Types of Competition
The study of how competition affects niches and resource allocation among species.
Strategies to measure competition and understand its dynamics and outcomes.
Tansley's Experiment (1917): First test of competition in plants.
Hypothesis: Different species are adapted to specific soil types leading to competitive superiority.
Predictions:
Each species performs best in its native soil.
Outcomes depend on the soil type when grown together.
Notable Species:
Galium saxatile (Heath bedstraw): Acidic soil specialist.
Galium sylvestre (White bedstraw): Alkaline soil specialist.
Common Garden Experiments: Measure plant competition under different soil conditions.
Chihuahuan Desert, Arizona (Brown and Munger, 1985): Exclosure experiments focused on granivores.
Results: Excluding large granivores led to higher populations of small granivores without significant effects on non-competing insectivores.
Degree of niche overlap impacts competition levels.
Complete Competitors: Compete for the same niche and are limited by the same resource.
Competitive Exclusion Principle: Complete competitors cannot coexist indefinitely; one species will outcompete the other.
Not all resources limit consumer populations.
Liebig’s Law of the Minimum: Population growth continues until limited by the most constrained resource.
Gause's Experiment (1934): Two species of Paramecium grown with a food source showed that only one species survived.
Illustrates competitive exclusion principle.
Joseph Connell's barnacle study demonstrated how competition influences species distribution across tidal zones.
In drier areas, Chthamalus adapts better, while Balanus thrives in wetter conditions.
Species can coexist if they are not complete competitors and are limited by different resources.
Greater ecological differences reduce competition likelihood, promoting coexistence.
Lotka-Volterra Competition Model: Extends logistic population models to include interspecies competition effects.
Involves two equations to reflect the impacts of each species on one another through competition coefficients (α and β).
α: Competitive effect of species 2 on species 1.
β: Competitive effect of species 1 on species 2.
Example: Food requirements can be translated into 'equivalents' to compare competitive pressures between species.
Analyzing conditions when growth is zero for one or both species leads to predicting competition outcomes.
Includes plotting isoclines for species growth and how population sizes interact at equilibrium.
Outcome 1: One species goes extinct if its isocline is farther.
Outcome 2: The opposite species goes extinct under similar conditions.
Outcome 3: Unstable equilibriums where fluctuating conditions may lead to one species dominating.
Outcome 4: Stable coexistence when interspecific competition is weaker than intraspecific competition.
Exploitation Competition: One species outcompetes another by more efficient resource utilization.
Interference Competition: One species prevents another from accessing resources directly (e.g., via aggressive behavior or chemical means).
Allelopathy: Existence of chemical barriers that inhibit neighboring plant growth, thus limiting competition.
Indirect competition where species compete via shared predators or parasites affecting their population dynamics.
Example: Pheasants supporting nematodes that adversely affect partridge populations.
Utilize Lotka-Volterra model to apply predictions based on given population densities, competition coefficients, and outcomes.