Population Dynamics and Carrying Capacity

Introduction

  • Population growth is characterized by fluctuations. - The population increases with each birth and decreases with each death.

    • A population does not maintain a constant size as deaths do not always equal births.

  • Carrying Capacity - Example: Red deer population on certain islands.

    • Estimated carrying capacity: ranges between 250 and 350, averaging around 300.

    • Despite fluctuations, the population remains within a narrow range around the carrying capacity.

  • Populations vary in stability. - Example of algae species in Lake Erie.

    • Algal populations exhibit extreme fluctuations over time.

    • Nutrient availability impacts growth rates.

    • Algae can double rapidly due to high reproduction rates, leading to crashes when nutrients deplete.

    • Dynamics of nutrient pulses significantly influence algal population growth.

True Carrying Capacity

  • Reproductive Output Variability - Example: Whitefish in Lake Erie.

    • Study shows a notable reproductive spike in 1944 that impacted future populations and age classes.

    • Fish from the 1944 cohort dominated catches for years until 1950.

  • Population dynamics affect generation representation. - Not all years yield the same reproductive output, thus affecting population structure.

Population of Wolves

  • Moose population dynamics: fluctuates cyclically. - Example from Isle Royale, Lake Superior.

    • Moose population grows until a harsh winter leads to starvation due to high population density.

  • Wolf population relies on the available moose population. - Wolves arrive on the island when an ice bridge forms.

    • Observed lag: wolf population peaks slightly after moose population peaks.

  • Example of reindeer on Saint Paul Island. - An exponential growth leads to overgrazing of lichens, resulting in extinction due to lack of food.

Population of Host

  • Use of parasitoids for pest control in citrus agriculture. - Introduction of Aphidus parasitoids effectively controlled the red scale pest.

  • Experimental Design - Three treatments: treated trees with and without scales, and a control group.

    • Sampling methodology included periodic checks over 12 weeks and selective trapping.

  • Study Results - Population oscillation of parasitoids and hosts documented over time.

Carrying Capacity Change

  • Changes in carrying capacity impact population dynamics. - Example: Three grass populations in Finland show predictable trends due to similar food sources and weather.

  • Mathematical modeling of population growth includes variations in carrying capacity over time. - Logistic Growth Equation:

    • Expressed as: dN/dt = rN(1 - (N/K)) - where r is the intrinsic growth rate, N is the population size, and K is the carrying capacity.

  • Delayed Density Dependence - Affects population reactions to changes in carrying capacity.

    • Introduces a time lag (tau) in response to changes and affects population stability.

Rate and Population

  • Overall, reproduction rate affects the frequency and magnitude of population fluctuations. - High reproductive rates and long lag times lead to significant fluctuations.

    • If intrinsic reproduction rate multiplied by lag time exceeds 1.37-1.57, it induces oscillating population patterns.

  • Small versus large populations: larger populations less likely to experience extinction during fluctuations.

Conclusion

  • Deterministic vs Stochastic Models - Deterministic Models: Predictable without accounting for randomness.

    • Stochastic Models: Incorporate randomness, acknowledging demographic or environmental variations.

    • Stochasticity leads to variations in reproductive output and survival rates.

  • Probability of extinction increases with time and smaller population sizes. - Smaller populations less resilient to fluctuations, making them more vulnerable to extinction.

    • Over time, the likelihood of experiencing negative events that cause extinction rises as variability compounds.