AP GOV NOTES Unit 1 (class notes)
All Power Remains to the States and their Unitary Governments
Law Enforcement gets power from Sacramento (State Capitol)
Sheriff gets power from County
Confederate 1776 - 1788
Gained from the Iroquois
At any point you can leave the confederation
Unitary Government shift into Federal Governments
Several Laws and Regulations Introduced
Education
Driving Laws
Licensing Laws
Currency
Trade
Waging Wars
People choose them to represent in government & make policies
Direct Democracy
People vote directly on the laws
Referendums, initiatives, and recalls
Initiative - Proposed drafts to Petitions to find new law by the people
Prop 8 = Same Sex Marriage Banned
Overturned by Supreme Court
Prop 13 = Property Tax Capped at 2%
Several Laws preventing the sales and tracking of firearms and numerous other goods.
Participatory Governments
Emphasizes broad participation in politics and civil society
Direct Democracy citizens participation, majority rule
Weaknesses:
May result in violation of minority rights
Majorities are oppressive
Federalist # 10 - Only difference between dictatorship and democracy the number of people involved
Contemporary Groups
Black Lives Matter
#Me Too Movement
Occupy Wallstreet
Tea Party
March for our Lives
Pluralist and participatory democracy
Pluralistic Democracy
Emphasizes the role of groups in policymaking
Competition prevents any single group from dominating government
Protects minority rights better than participatory democracy
NAACC -> Rosa Parks, MLK,
Weaknesses:
Particularly strong group may have disproportionate influence
Interest groups, political parties
Federalist 10 -> Only way to stop factions is to counter with opposite factions
Nazis Party -> Jewish People
Ku Klux Klan -> checked by other groups and organizations
Elite Democracy
Emphasizes limited participation in politics and civil society
Representative democracy
Weaknesses:
Government may be dominated by the wealthy, and those with high status is business, military, and politics
EisenHower’s Warning
Contemporary example
Electoral college, congressional law-making
Type of democracy that is reflected in the U.S constitution
Elite Democracy in the constitution, the electoral college selects the president because the framers didn’t trust the people to directly elect the president, established a republic instead of democracy
Participatory democracy in the constitution, amendments that expanded suffrage (15th, 19th, 26th), direct elections for House of Representatives
Pluralist Democracy in the constitution, Freedom of assembly allows for creation of interest groups & political parties
Weapons and Military Manufacturing Companies
Boeing
Lockheed Martin
Northrop Grumman
RTX (Raytheon)
Brutus No. 1 & Federalist No. 10
Federalist #10 is often used in support of pluralist democracy
Brutus #1 is used in support of participatory democracy
Anti-Federalist
Anti-Federalists opposed the new constitution and believed in states rights
Feared
National government would restrict personal liberty
National government would take over state powers
Congress would tax heavy
The Supreme Court would overrule state courts
The President would head a large, standing army
Goals:
Have a bill of rights added
More restriction on governmental power
Eliminate congress’ ability to tax
Brutus #1
Emphasized the benefits of a small, decentralized republic
Warned of loss of liberty that would result from a large, centralized government
Federalists
Supported the new Constitution and a strong central government
Federalist #10
A large republic is the best way to control factions, to delegate authority to elected representatives, and to disperse power between the states and national governments
Bill Of Rights - Approved and Enacted in 1792
First 10 amendments
Guarantees of individual rights from government abuse
Why would some people only support ratification of the Constitution if a Bill of Rights was added?
They thought they needed to be protected from the federal government
Why wouldn’t others, most notably, the federalists, argue that a Bill of Rights wasn’t necessary?
There were already laws that protected you from federal government
Designed to protect people from the federal government
Expose Facto Law - No laws after the fact it has been established
Articles of Confederation
Established a very weak government
Established a unicameral congress in which each state had 1 vote
All states follow unicameral government except Nebraska because they’re special
No executive or judicial branch
Each state was sovereign
Congress could NOT:
Tax state or people
Regulate interstate commerce
States COULD:
Impose tariffs on other states
Create their own currencies
Refuse to recognize treaties by Articles of Confederation
They needed a Congress that COULD:
Declare war and make treaties
Raise an army
Coin money
Borrow money
Shays’ Rebellion
Lack of centralized military power led to a slow response to put down the rebellion
78% of the government's income went into the custom house
Ensured taxes are paid
Long Wharf surrounds Boston
No military response - lack of preparedness
Showed the weakness of the government under the Articles of Confederation
“The straw that broke the Camel’s back”
NEED A STRONGER GOVERNMENT NOW
State Sovereignty: Each state governs itself no other form of government should have control
North of Ohio River Valley
Divided up into sections so that most would have equal representation of participatory democracy
Slavery not allowed anymore
Legacy of French = Haiti
French didn’t leave much at all
French wanted more land = help the United States
Potential for profits in the South
Land was really bad and conditions only got worse
TOPIC 1.5 Ratification of the U.S. Constitution
Compromise
Coming together with a rationale or negotiations so that both parties achieve something
Constitutional convention
Stated purpose: For the sole and expressed purpose of revising the Articles of Confederation
Political Negotiation and compromise significantly impacted the development of the Constitution
A constitution is a framework for government
Politically negotiate and compromise on the impact of the Constitution
Virginia plan
Bicameral legislature in which both houses are apportioned based on population
Favored on population
Favored large states
Stronger National Government
James Madison (Squeaker)
Pulls a stronger government out of all of the people
Most Powerful and Wealthiest State Government
Extremely Successful
New Jersey Plan
Uncameral legislature in which all states are equal
Favored small states
Merely wanted to amend Articles of Confederation
GREAT COMPROMISE
AKA Connecticut Compromise
Established a bicameral legislature
House: Population; Senate: 2 per state
More people = more representation
All States are equal
Grand Committee
Negotiated the Great Compromise
Convinced the large states to agree to the bicameral legislature with = representation in the senate by requiring that all revenue bills originate in the House
States (important!!!!!) gave up power to make the national government
FARMERS GAVE UP NOTHING !!!!!!!!!!!!
Interests of different states aren’t going to change anytime soon
Senators re-elected every 6 years (State)
House Seats are elected every 2 years (the people)
Takes time to campaign, more than 6 months
Electoral College
Compromise between those who wanted Congress to vote for the president and those who wanted citizens to directly elect the president
Three-Fifths Compromise
Each slave would count as ⅗ a person for the purpose of representation in the House of Representatives
Owning a slave is worth thousands of $$$ to this day
This compromise gained the support of the South without the support, Compromise wouldn’t pass
Compromise on importation of slaves
Congress could not ban the importation of slaves for 20 years from the ratification of the Constitution
Southern states agreed to end the importation of slaves after 20 years if northern states returned fugitive slaves
Amendment process
Debates about self-government during the drafting of the constitution led to the establishment of an amendment process. The Constitution can be amended by either
⅔ vote in both Houses of Congress to propose & ¾ of state legislatures ratify
⅔ of the states request a national convention to propose & 3/4 of state conventions ratify
Only 27 Amendments due to inability to come to agreements
Everyone would know if a new amendment would be passed
27th - Congress makes a law
which determines their own pay, the pay raise may not take effect until the next election
The Constitution is nothing but a bundle full of compromises
Contemporary debates
What is the proper role of the central government?
Government is stealing my information
1.6 Principles of American Government
Laguna Beach = Wealthiest District due to housing
Girl with severe autism = denied and sent to a lower class school = parent outrage
Lawsuit time !!!!!!!!!!
Federalist 51:
Madison - Not end democracy but keep it self maintained
Greater access points to government
Separation of powers
Governmental powers are assigned to three different branches of government: Legislative, Executive, and Judicial
Congressional powers
Make laws
Power of the purse
Declare war
Executive powers
Enforce laws
Makes treaties
Commander-in-chief for the military
Judicial powers
Interpret laws
Review decisions of state and lower federal courts
Checks and balances
Each branch is given the ability to block or influence other branches, regulate power
Congressional Checks on President/Executive
Override Veto
Impeach the president
Refuse to pass a bill
Confirm presidential nominees
Ratify treaties
Congressional checks on judiciary
Alter # of judges
Change jurisdiction of lower courts
Propose a constitutional amendment
Pass legislation
Conform judicial nominees
Impeach federal judges
Executive checks
Presidential checks on Congress
Veto legislation
Presidential checks on Judiciary
Nominate federal judges
Ignore a Supreme Court ruling
Judiciary checks
On congress
Declare federal laws unconstitutional
On president
Declare executive orders/presidential actions unconstitutional
Separation of powers and checks and balances
Prevents any one branch or person from obtaining too much power
Provides multiple access points for stakeholders and institutions to influence public policy
Ensure that the people’s will is represented and freedom is preserved
Federalism
Division of powers between national state and local government
In a federal system, sovereignty is shared by the national government and by state governments
The relationship between the states and national government is dynamic because it has changed over time
Delegated powers
Given to the federal government
Coin money
Foreign policy and trade
Immigration
Reserved powers
Held by the states
Education
Health and welfare
Licenses
Marriage
Concurrent powers
Powers held by both federal and state governments
Tax
Borrowing money
Established banks
Layered cake vs marble cake
Dual federalism (layered cake)
Federal and state governments are each supreme in thei brown sphere; their powers do not overlap
Federal government had little power
cooperative federalism (marble cake)
Federal and state governments share responsibility, cost, and administration of policies
Federal government makes the rules
Gives more power to the federal government
Civil War/New Deal
Federal power grew during the civil war and then permanently expanded during the great Depression when the federal government began taking an active role in the economy
The new deal is sen as the point of transition from dual to cooperative federalism
National recovery act of 1933
As a part of FDR new Deal, the NRA authorized the president to regulate industrial prices and wages in hopes that this would stimulate the economy caught within the grips of Great Depression. The NRA led to a dramatic increase in federal economic regulation
Grants-in-aid
Federal money to states for specific purpose
90% of federal money to states comes in the form of categorical grants
Usually preferred by the federal government/Congress because it gives congress more control over how the money is spent
Categorical grants
incentives/conditions-of-aid
“Strings attached”; what states must do to receive federal money (technically optional)
Funded or unfunded mandates
Rules of states MUST do, whether they receive money or not
National Minimum Drinking Age Act
The goal of the law was to have a uniform minimum drinking age of 21 nationwide. The law dictates that any states that allowed people under 21 years of age to purchase alcohol would have their federal highway funds reduced by 10% each year.
American with disabilities act of 1990
The ADA banned discrimination against persons with disabilities. One element of the ADA was that it included an unfunded mandate to state governments that all public buildings, for example, public schools and courthouses, must be accessible to disabled persons
Block Grants
Federal $ given to states to use within a broad purpose
Preferred by states because they have more freedom to choose how to use the money
Revenue Sharing
Federal money allocated to state and local governments with no strings attached. Federal revenue sharing existed from 1972-1986
“Share pls, im poor” - no longer works
Federal Grant
Gives Federal money but is regulated based on traits or spending location which weakens state power
Devolution
Attempts to give power back to the states
New federalism
A return to more distinct lines of responsibility for federal and state programs
Expressed powers
AKA explicit
Directly stated in constitution
Article 1 Section 8 Clause 1-17 (expressed powers)
Implied powers
Not directly stated in the constitution; claimed by congress, based on the necessary and proper clause
Allow Congress to make economic, environmental, and social legislation
ARTICLE 1 SECTION 8 clause 18 (implied powers)
Elastic Clause
Necessary and proper clause to grant power
Commerce Clause
Congress has the power to regulate interstate commerce
Supremacy Clause
When Federal and state laws conflict, the federal law is superior
INTERSTATE = COMMERCE ACROSS STATE LINES
Congress has power
INTRASTATE = business inside a state
Congress = no ability to regulate
Balance of power
Between national and state governments has changed over time
McChulloch V Maryland (1819)
Declared that Congress has implied powers necessary to implement its enumerated powers
Established supremacy of the US constitution and federal laws over state laws
How to make a bank when constitution doesn’t consider banking an option
How can Maryland even tax people
Supremacy = Federal is higher than State but both can’t do certain things
Federal = upper hand over the case
Changing interpretation of the Commerce Clause
Constitution
Congress shall have the power to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states
Gibbons V Ogden (1825)
Declared that ONLY
Congress can regulate interstate commerce. States CANNOT
1937-Present
Very broad interpretation of “interstate commerce”
Allowed congress to regulate anything
Civil Rights act of 1964
Outlawed racial discrimination by businesses that serve the the public such as restaurants, theaters, stores, etc
Congress claimed the commerce clause gave them power to regulate these businesses
The court ruled that it was interstate commerce because even though the the motel is in a single state, many of its guests come from out of state, therefore the motel is engaging in interstate commerce
The CRA applies to restaurants who serve food that has crossed state lines
Gun Free School Zones Act of 1990
Made it a federal crime to bring a gun within 1,000 feet of a school
United States V Lopez (1995)
First modern limit on Congressional use of its commerce clause power
Introduced a new phase of federalism that emphasized that importance of state sovereignty and local control
Violence against women act of 1994
Allowed domestic violence victims to file civil lawsuits in federal court
United States v Morrison (2000)
Ruled that congress exceeded their commerce power and struck down the civil suit portion of the law
The court emphasized the noneconomic, criminal nature of conduct, that was regulated
1.9
Federalism
Advantages
Multiple access points offer more opportunities for political participation
States can make policy specific to their individual needs
States can make policy in absence of national consensus
States can be laboratories of democracy
The federal government can establish uniform policy when necessary
Senate Majority Leader
Determines what Bills are introduced to the Senate
Selecting Judges
Presidents wants Judges who are ideologically similar to him
Tenure
Life Term; can’t be fired or have pay reduce
Strategic Retirements
Judges retired when a president from their party is in power
Desire to be replaced by somebody ideologically similar
Recess Appointments
President nominates judges while Congress in recessed
Sometimes used by president to fill court vacancies with judges who the Senate may not confirm
Recess appointment judges serve for 1 year and must be confirmed by the senate by then to remain in the position
NLRB V. Noel Canning (2014)
Jan, 2012, Obama made recess appointments for district court judges before the session of Congress began at the end of the month. However during Jan the Senate met in pro forma (brief meetings sometimes less than a min) every 3 business days
The 3 day break between pro forma sessions does not represent a significant break and cannot justify use of a recess appointment. 10 days was the appropriate lower limit to trigger the recess appointments
Decreased the power of the president