Historical Context
Emerged after the Classical school of thought, which dominated the 19th to early 20th century.
Classical economics emphasized market-clearing principles: prices adjust quickly according to supply and demand.
Foundation: Economic systems must be framed within a legal structure for resource allocation.
Key Developments
Adam Smith (1776): Authored The Wealth of Nations, introducing significant microeconomic perspectives.
Observational methods showcased efficiencies (e.g., the pin factory and car assembly line).
1929 Stock Crash: Led to the Great Depression and prompted a Keynesian reaction advocating government intervention to stimulate demand.
Potential Real GDP
Defined by labor, capital, and technology.
Necessary to understand deviations of real GDP from potential GDP.
Flexible Wages and Prices
More flexible than previously suggested by Keynesian perspectives.
Expectations
Rational expectation theory: agents use all available information to make economic predictions, influencing prices and outcomes.
Positive Demand Shock
Caused by an external factor affecting GDP, resulting in a rightward shift of the Aggregate Demand (AD) curve.
Nominal Wages: Must rise to maintain real wages, impacting firms' costs and shifting the Short-Run Aggregate Supply (SRAS) left.
Graphical Analysis
Neoclassical Explanation (Dotted Line): Wages/prices quickly adjust leading to short-lived economic benefits.
Keynesian Explanation (Solid Line): Slower adjustments lead to prolonged dis-equilibrium and extended impacts on output.
Households prefer immediate wage adjustments to mitigate rising prices due to inflation.
Fully Anticipated Demand Shock: Results in higher prices without increased output, signifying a shift from point A to point C on the AD curve without deviation from the Long-Run Aggregate Supply (LRAS) curve.
Rational Expectations: If households expect inflation due to increased aggregate demand, they may demand higher nominal wages, keeping real GDP stable.
An increase in money supply often leads to higher prices but no meaningful change in output.
Hyperinflation Phenomenon: Results from simultaneous rightward shift of the AD and leftward shift of the SRAS due to expected inflation and increased nominal wages.
Phillips Curve Insights: Neoclassical perspectives predict multiple inflation levels can exist at the same unemployment, represented by a vertical long-run Phillips curve.
Wages and prices adjust rapidly under neoclassical thought, effectively managing the effects of anticipated demand shocks.
Fiscal vs. Monetary Policy: Fiscal policy has limits, whereas monetary policy can continuously increase the money supply practically without immediate output change.
The neoclassical relationship is a vertical line, indicating no long-term trade-off between inflation and unemployment.
Key Shifts:
Inflation Expectations: Change can shift the Short-Run Phillips Curve (SRPC) to meet a new long-term equilibrium.
Natural Unemployment Rate Changes: Affected shifts in the Long-Run Phillips Curve (LRPC) impact both curves.
Modern macroeconomic models integrate both neoclassical and Keynesian principles, informed by microeconomic foundations focusing on maximizing behavior of households and firms.
Policy Landscape Uncertainty: Trade wars influencing household consumption and business investment.
Mixed Economic Pressures: AD weakening against upward inflation pressure creates complex dynamics in pricing and output predictions.
The synergy between neoclassical and Keynesian economics helps contextualize modern economic challenges through both long-term and short-term analytical lenses.