Discusses shifts in internet research focusing on state and corporate control over political activism.
Underlines a lack of critical theory addressing how male dominance in social media perception affects feminist activism.
Conceptualizes men as active surveillants of feminist discourse online, indicating a gap in existing literary frameworks.
Explores how digital surveillance surpasses traditional governance modes.
Emphasizes the need for feminist scholarship to examine the repercussions of male surveillants on women's political activism.
Highlights the visibility of feminist organizing via social media despite increasing targeting by male adversaries.
Surveillance as per Andrejevic is characterized as:
Information collection coupled with power dynamics.
Online harassment experienced by women differs significantly from men’s experiences, often involving systemic threats.
Recent feminist organizing leverages platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube.
Current narratives celebrating the rise of feminism through social media classify it as the fourth wave.
Feminist activists are increasingly positioned to share experiences and rally collective action through social media.
However, the counterpoint of increased visibility is the vulnerability to male harassment and criticism.
Example: Caroline Criado-Perez faced severe online abuse following her activism for representation on banknotes.
Social media increases both the opportunity for feminist discourse and for countering voices, complicating the narrative of liberation.
Calls to examine how visibility in digital spaces can uphold or undermine feminist agendas.
Encourages considering the protective spaces cultivated in previous feminist movements, contrasting them with public social media dynamics.
Studies show tensions between the celebratory accounts of women's digital empowerment against the backdrop of male surveillance.
Algorithms and content moderation practices often reflect male biases that adversely affect the visibility of feminist content.
Manifests the necessity for a critical feminist inquiry into the prevalent digital landscape and its surveillance implications.
Anita Sarkeesian: Examines how her critiques of misogyny in the gaming industry prompted online abuse, illustrating the brutal social media landscape for feminist activists.
Free the Nipple Campaign: Exemplifies a misunderstanding of political objectives within feminist movements, as its branding can inadvertently reinforce patriarchal views.
Campaign utilizes sexually suggestive imagery that detracts from deeper feminist aims.
Gendered forms of control through surveillance practices necessitate further academic scrutiny.
Calls for expanding the understanding of digital surveillance landscapes to incorporate women’s lived experiences.
Emphasizes that modern feminist discourse must navigate a complex matrix of male dominance, socio-political engagement, and the repercussions of increased visibility in social media spaces.