Unit 1 comprehensive summary (1.1, 1.2, 1.3)
A perspective is how a situation is viewed, based on personal and collective assumptions, values, and beliefs.
Perspectives are informed by sociocultural norms, scientific understandings, laws, religion, economic conditions, events, and lived experience.
Values are qualities or principles considered important.
Organizational values are reflected in advertisements, media, policies, and actions.
Value surveys can investigate perspectives on environmental issues and how values impact these issues.
Worldviews are shared lenses through which groups perceive and act within their environment, shaping values and perspectives.
Examples:
Buddhism: all living things are interdependent; humans are not more important.
Christianity and Islam: belief in 'dominion' over the earth (though Islam also emphasizes humans as caretakers).
Native American: communal property, subsistence economy, oral tradition, polytheistic religion with spirituality in nature.
EVS is a model showing inputs (media, education, worldview) affecting perspectives and outputs (judgments, actions).
EVS Spectrum:
Ecocentric: ecology and nature-centered, prioritizes biorights and self-sufficiency.
Anthropocentric: humans manage the global system sustainably using regulations and legislation.
Technocentric: technology solves environmental problems, prioritizes the economy, encourages scientific research.
Extreme EVS:
Deep Ecologists: reject materialism.
Cornucopians: environmental concerns should not inhibit economic growth.
EVS overlap and complement each other, rarely fitting perfectly into classifications.
Perspectives evolve over time, influenced by campaigns and social changes.
Influenced by:
Literature (e.g., Rachel Carson's Silent Spring).
Activists (e.g., Greta Thunberg).
Media (e.g., An Inconvenient Truth).
Disasters (e.g., Fukushima).
International agreements (e.g., Paris Agreement/COP 21).
Technological developments (e.g., Green Revolution).
Scientific discoveries (e.g., biodiversity loss).
A system is a set of interrelated parts working together, living or non-living, applicable at various scales.
Systems approach visualizes interactions, producing emergent properties.
Composed of storages (boxes) and flows (arrows).
Flows: inputs and outputs of energy and matter; transfers (change in location) or transformations (change in state/nature).
Transfers: movement of energy/matter without changing its state (e.g., herbivore to carnivore).
Transformations: change in state/nature (e.g., photosynthesis).
Open system: exchanges energy and matter.
Closed system: exchanges only energy, rare in nature (e.g., global geochemical cycles, Earth as an 'almost' closed system).
Earth and its biological systems act as a single entity with self-regulating negative feedback loops.
Based on constant temperature, atmospheric composition, and ocean salinity.
Negative feedback (stabilizing): inhibits or reverses a process to reduce change (e.g., sweating in hot weather).
Positive feedback (destabilizing): amplifies a disturbance, leading to a new equilibrium or tipping point (e.g., melting ice caps).
Equilibrium: tendency to return to original state after disturbance.
Steady-state equilibrium: constant inputs of energy/matter, system remains stable (e.g., climax ecosystem).
Stable vs. unstable equilibria: return to the same vs. new equilibrium after disturbance.
Minimum change causing destabilization.
Characteristics: positive feedback, threshold, long-lasting changes, hard to reverse, time lag.
Examples: lake eutrophication, extinction of keystone species.
Simplified version of reality used to understand and predict system behavior.
Formats: graphs, diagrams, equations, simulations, words.
Strengths: easier to work with, can predict effects, identify patterns.
Weaknesses: loss of accuracy, wrong assumptions lead to errors.
Appear as system components interact (e.g., ecosystem stability, climate patterns, urban heat islands).
Tendency to avoid tipping points and maintain stability; capacity to recover from disturbance.
Diversity and storage size contribute to resilience.
Eucalypt forests adapted to survive fires.
Loss of resilience due to human activities (e.g., deforestation).
Measure of long-term viability of a system; responsible maintenance of socio-ecological systems.
Enhancing system resilience increases sustainability.
Environmental, social, and economic.
True sustainability achieved when all three are in balance.
Weak vs. Strong Sustainability models.
Managing resources for replacement and ecosystem recovery; focuses on resource depletion, pollution, and biodiversity.
Natural capital (resources) and natural income (yield from resources).
Ecological overshoot: humanity's demand exceeds what Earth can renew annually.
Creating structures supporting human well-being (health, education, equity).
Creating economic structures supporting production and consumption for future needs; relies on environmental sustainability.
Meeting present needs without compromising future generations.
Framework for human civilization development with economic stability, social equity, and ecological integrity.
Can lead to ecosystem collapse (e.g., Newfoundland Cod Fishery).
GDP as a measure may cause unsustainable development; Green GDP accounts for environmental costs.
Right to a pollution-free environment and equitable resource access, regardless of demographics.
Examples: Bulakan Shanty (Jakarta), Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill.
Disparities in access to water, food, and energy due to income, race, gender, and culture.
Reasons for varying consumption include access, quantity, wealth, technology, and infrastructure.
Quantitative measures of biodiversity, pollution, population, climate change, footprints; applied locally to globally.
Ecological Footprint: area of land/water required to provide resources and absorb waste.
Carbon Footprint: amount of greenhouse gases produced.
Water Footprint: water use.
Biocapacity: area's capacity to generate resources and absorb wastes; unsustainability if footprint exceeds biocapacity.
Role in monitoring Earth systems and resource sustainability.
Simplified versions of reality with uses and limitations.
UN goals and targets for social and environmental sustainability.
Uses: common ground for policymaking, galvanizing international community.
Limits: goals not far enough, bureaucratic, ignoring local contexts, lacking data.
Identifies limits of human disturbance to Earth systems.
Uses: identifies limits, highlights need, alerts public.
Limitations: focuses on ecology, work in progress, focus on global.
Framework for a regenerative and distributive economy.
Includes social foundation (SDGs) and ecological ceiling (planetary boundaries).
Uses: ecological and social elements, popular awareness, supports action.
Limitations: work in progress, advocates principles, does not propose specific policies.
Promotes decoupling economic activity from finite resources.
Principles: eliminating waste and pollution, circulating products and materials, regenerating nature.
Butterfly Diagram.
Uses: regeneration, emission reduction, community support, consumer habit changes.
Limitations: lack of awareness, regulations, technical limitations, finance.