Approaches
Wilhelm Wundt set up the first psychology lab in Leipzig in 1875
Focused on aspects of the mind that could be observed and measured in controlled conditions
Used introspection- studying the functions of the mind by asking people to describe their own thoughts, feelings and experiences
First person to suggest the mind could be studied empirically using experiments
Introspection was criticised for being subjective
Watson began the behaviourist movement, studying observable stimulus-response behaviour
Aimed to be more subjective
Learning approach
Emphasises the role of the environment and experience in learning behaviours
Only considers observable behaviour and uses methods like lab experiments to gain control of variables and look for cause and effect relationships
Highly objective
Uses animal research as humans and animals learn by the same mechanisms
Learning by association
First investigated by Pavlov
If a stimulus is paired multiple times with an existing stimulus-response, an association is made between the two stimuli
Stimulus generalisation- found that other stimuli similar to the conditioned stimulus also lead to the conditioned response
Stimulus discrimination- if many different neutral stimuli are presented but only one is paired with the unconditioned stimulus, only one stimulus will become conditioned
Temporal contiguity- unconditioned stimulus and neutral stimulus have to be paired at the same time
Unconditioned stimulus = unconditioned response
Neutral stimulus = no response
Unconditioned stimulus + neutral stimulus = unconditioned response
Conditioned stimulus = conditioned response
:) Used in developing treatments for mental illnesses such as systematic desensitisation to treat phobias, which has been found to be very effective
:) Very scientific- use of lab experiments and scientific method increases reliability and internal validity
:( Overly reductionist as it explains behaviour in terms of stimulus and response, ignores roles of mental processes and biological factors
:( Uses animal research- may lack generalisability, risk of ethical issues
:( Environmental determinism
Learning by consequences
First investigated by Skinner
Positive reinforcement- positive consequence to the action
Negative reinforcement- removal of something unpleasant as a positive consequence to the action
Punishment- negative consequence to the action
Rats placed in a cage where food would only be delivered if they pressed a lever
Rats quickly learned to press the lever and would continue until they were full
Variation where the box gave the rats electric shocks until they pressed a lever
Quickly learned to press the lever again
:) Used for token economies, which have been shown to be effective in treating behaviours like aggression in prisons
:( 69% DNA shared between humans and rats- cannot extrapolate, hard to generalise results
:( Ethical issues- causing harm to the rats by electrocuting them
We learn by observing others
Similar to behaviourist- both assume most behaviour is learnt and are considered learning approaches, but SLT says we can learn just by observing others
Involves modelling and imitation
Vicarious reinforcement- if we see a model's behaviour being reinforced, we are more likely to imitate that behaviour
Vicarious punishment- if we see a model's behaviour being punished, we are less likely to imitate that behaviour
Pay particular attention to role models (people we identify with most) and learn from their behaviour
Most likely to imitate if the role model is similar to them
Mediational processes
Attention- observing someone doing a behaviour
Retention- remembering the behaviour
Motivation- wanting to do it
Motor reproduction- being able to do it
Children observed an adult role model either being aggressive or nice to a Bobo doll, or no adult at all (control group)
They were most likely to act aggressive if they had seen a role model also act aggressive
Were more likely to imitate if the adult was the same gender as them
Second study- children saw adult be rewarded with sweets, punished with shouting, or no consequences
Those who saw reward were much more likely to act aggressively
:) Lab experiments- could control extraneous variables like other toys and time spent in room, high internal validity
:) Found consistent results when repeated, reliable
:( Artificial and strange environment, lacks ecological validity
:( Some children may have played with Bobo dolls before and known you are supposed to hit them- extraneous variable, may reduce internal validity
:) Accepts that cognitive processes have an influence on learning and it is not just an automatic process- more holistic than behaviourist
:) Useful application, e.g. social skills training aims to model positive behaviour to reduce crime
:( Can’t directly observe mediational processes so cannot use the scientific method to study them
:( Most evidence comes from lab studies- low ecological validity
Emerged in 1960s after researchers criticised the behaviourist approach for not taking into account internal mental processes, assumes they should be studied using controlled lab studies
Assumptions:
Psychology must study mental processes
Internal processes can be studied in labs by inferring from behaviour
The human mind works like a computer, with input from senses and output in the form of behaviour
Types of mental processes- perception, attention, memory
Schemas- packets of info used to interpret the world, developed from past experiences and help predict what will happen in a new situation
Assimilation- experience matches schema and is assimilated into it, when an experience is remembered some details may be changed to assimilate into schema
Accommodation- experience doesn’t match schema, schema changes to accommodate new information
Uses theoretical models to represent internal mental processes
Allows processes to be broken down into component parts and think about what each section does
Information processing model- Input (sensory info), processing (mental operations), output (perception, memories, behaviour)
Uses inference to refine theoretical models
Cognitive neuroscience has recently emerged, investigates how different areas of the brain are involved in mental processes by using fMRI and PET scans
Combination of cognitive and biological approaches
:) Scientific- controlled lab settings so high validity, theoretical models are falsifiable
:) Can be applied to understand and treat mental disorders like with CBT
:( Reductionist- simplifies behaviour too much, ignores role of emotions and motivations
:( Could lack ecological validity- lab settings
Suggests human behaviour is caused by factors like genes, neurochemicals and physical structures
Assumptions:
CNS has a very strong influence on behaviour
Genetic make-up of individuals influences their behaviours
Chemicals like hormones and neurotransmitters influence behaviour
CNS allows communication between the environment and the brain by passing messages throughout the body
Genotype- genetic make-up of a person
Phenotype- the way genes are expressed in the behaviour or physical appearance of a person, can be influenced by the environment
Can observe the influence of genes using twin studies
Study monozygotic twins who have an identical genetic code, higher concordance rate than dizygotic twins may suggest a genetic influence
Not 100% accurate, genotype is the same but phenotype may be different
Evolution- process by which a species adapts to its environment
Genetic info is passed on through generations when the resulting behaviour aids survival and reproduction
:) Highly scientific methods that use empirical and objective evidence, e.g. brain scans and twin studies
:) Understanding influence of genetics on behaviour means we can help people who suffer from genetically inherited conditions
:( Biological determinism- says we have no control over who we are and no ability to change, means we can’t hold people accountable for their behaviour
:( Overly reductionist, ignores social and cultural causes of behaviour
Developed by Sigmund Freud in the late 19th century
Key assumption- most behaviour is caused by unconscious mind
Three parts of the consciousness
Conscious- accessed information
Preconscious- information that is not currently being accessed but can be
Unconscious- inaccessible information, contains info that the conscious would find uncomfortable so is protected by defence mechanisms
Tripartite structure of personality
Id- present from birth, unconscious, contains primitive desires, demands instant gratification
Ego- develops in anal stage, mediator between id and superego
Superego- develops in phallic stage, conscience that punishes the person with guilt when giving in to the id and pushes the person to be good
Defence mechanisms
Repression- ego pushes desires of the id back into the unconscious
Denial- ego ignores superego and refuses to believe it has given in to the id, stops feelings of guilt
Displacement- redirection of impulses away from the target to safer ones
Psychosexual stages
Oral (0-18 months)- focus on mouth, gratification gained from feeding. Id is dominant
Anal (18 months-3 years)- focus on anus, gratification gained from pooping. Ego develops through toilet training
Anally retentive- nervous about toilet
Anally expulsive- overly obsessed with using toilet
Phallic (3-6 years)- focus on penis, child passes through Oedipus or Electra complex. Gender identity and superego develop
Oedipus complex- attraction to mother and jealousy of father
Castration anxiety- worry that his father will remove his penis
Electra complex- attraction to father and distrust of mother
Penis envy- anger at mother because girls think she stole their penis
Latent (6-12 years)- no precise focus, conflicts of previous three stages are repressed
Genital (12 years+)- focus on own reproductive organs, sexual energy directed towards relationships with sexual partners
Libido- desire for sex, focus of id for rest of life
Psychological disorders are caused by repressed psychological traumas from the first 3 stages that shape the impulses of the id later in life
Oral fixation- habits like smoking and biting nails
Anally expulsive- emotional, prone to anger, messy
Anally retentive- neat, organised and careful
Phallic fixation- jealous, anxious
:) Little Hans- fear of horses, 5 years old and curious about penis (phallic stage) and wanted all of his mother’s attention (Oedipus complex), Freud thought Hans was scared of his father and fear was displaced to horses :( Case studies lack generalisability :( Self-report from Hans’ father, may not be objective
:) First focus on psychological causes for psychological disorders
:( Unscientific- focus on patients’ dreams so not based on empirical evidence, cannot test unconscious so theories are unfalsifiable
:( Case studies have low population validity
:( Gender bias- overemphasises male sexuality and relies on outdated gender stereotypes
:( Cultural bias- developed within and for Western society
Rejects reductionist and deterministic ideas about human motivation and behaviour
Focuses on the subjective experience of being human, believes everyone is unique and results can never be generalised
Rejects the scientific method
Led to the development of humanistic counselling
Key ideas about humans
Cannot be reduced to components
All unique
Conscious and aware of themselves
Have free will and responsibility for their actions
Purposeful and creative
Created in response to the behaviourist approach
Can only fulfil a level if every level below it is met
Have to achieve all to achieve self-actualisation
Self-actualisation- becoming the best person you can be and achieving your full potential as a human being, everyone has a drive to achieve it
Most people do not achieve it
Involves creative expression, experiencing beauty, and knowledge and understanding
Because everyone is unique, everyone will self-actualise in different ways
Created by Rogers
Personal growth is stopped by experiencing conditional positive regard, where people have to meet conditions of worth to have self-worth
Limits chances of achieving self-actualisation, causes incongruence
Can be set by themselves or someone else
Three selves that need to be integrated
Real self- who you really are
Self-concept- who you think you are
Ideal self- who you want to be
Congruence- when the ideal self and the self-concept are the same
When this is met, the person will self-actualise
Client-centred therapy aims to achieve congruence and self-actualisation by providing unconditional positive regard where the client is accepted for who they are without judgement
Removes conditions of worth
Therapist is non-directive and seeks to reflect back to the client whatever they disclose in an environment of trust and mutual regard
:) Allows for personal growth and accepts the idea of free will, which seems intuitively correct
:) Therapy has been shown to be effective and is a good alternative to psychoanalysis or medication
:( Cultural bias- concepts like hierarchy of needs are biased towards individualistic cultures
:( Not scientific because it is based on vague concepts, e.g. cannot operationalise self-actualisation so cannot make predictions involving it
:( Ignores biological explanations of behaviour so doesn’t offer useful treatments for mental disorders caused by biological factors
Free will | Soft determinism | Hard determinism |
---|---|---|
Humanistic | Cognitive | Psychodynamic |
SLT | Behaviourist | |
Biological |
Behaviourist- environmental determinism, behaviour is controlled by stimulus-response conditioning
SLT- soft determinism, behaviour is controlled by environmental forces but humans have free choice and personal responsibilities
Cognitive- soft determinism, behaviour is controlled by schemas and mediational processes but humans can choose which behaviour they attend to
Biological- biological determinism, behaviour is controlled by internal biological factors like genes and hormones
Psychodynamic- psychic determinism, behaviour is determined by unconscious drives and early childhood experiences
Humanistic- free will, humans have control over their environment and are capable of change
Nature | Both | Nurture |
---|---|---|
Biological | Psychodynamic | Behaviourist |
Cognitive | SLT | |
Humanistic |
Behaviourist- nurture, humans are born as a blank slate and behaviour is learned through classical and operant conditioning
SLT- nurture, behaviour is learnt through observing and imitating role models
Cognitive- nature and nurture, some cognitive mechanisms are innate but they are also shaped by experience
Biological- nature, behaviour is the result of innate biological factors
Psychodynamic- nature and nurture, behaviour is due to innate drives but shaped by early childhood experiences
Humanistic- mostly nurture, behaviour is shaped by environment as humans strive to achieve self-actualisation
Reductionism | Both | Holism |
---|---|---|
Behaviourist | Psychodynamic | Humanistic |
Cognitive | ||
Biological | ||
SLT |
Behaviourist- environmental reductionism, behaviour is broken down into simple stimulus-response associations
SLT- environmental reductionism, behaviour is due to observing and imitating role models
Cognitive- environmental reductionism, breaks processes into simpler parts like in theoretical models
Biological- biological reductionism, behaviour is broken down into biological structures and processes
Psychodynamic- reductionism and holism, behaviour is reduced to innate drives but takes account of multiple aspects of human behaviour
Humanistic- holism, focuses on understanding all aspects of human experience
Idiographic | Both | Nomothetic |
---|---|---|
Humanistic | Psychodynamic | Behaviourist |
Cognitive | ||
Biological | ||
SLT |
Behaviourist- nomothetic, attempts to establish general laws of behaviour, as behaviour is due to stimulus-response associations
SLT- nomothetic, attempts to establish general laws of behaviour, such as vicarious reinforcement
Cognitive- nomothetic, attempts to establish general laws of cognitive processing
Biological- nomothetic, attempts to establish general laws using human physiological explanations
Psychodynamic- idiographic and nomothetic, relies on case studies and unique childhood experiences, but attempts to establish general laws of behaviour
Humanistic- idiographic, focuses on the subjective human experience and makes no attempt to establish general laws
Scientific | Mostly scientific | Unscientific |
---|---|---|
Behaviourist | Cognitive | Psychodynamic |
Biological | SLT | Humanistic |
Behaviourist- scientific, uses the scientific method of investigation and relies on lab studies
SLT- mostly scientific, uses lab studies but takes account of mediational processes
Cognitive- mostly scientific, uses lab studies but cannot directly observe cognitive processes
Biological- scientific, uses the scientific method of investigation and relies on lab studies
Psychodynamic- not scientific, examines many concepts and theories that cannot be empirically tested and relies on subjective interpretation
Humanistic- not scientific, rejects scientific method and therefore cannot provide empirical evidence
Wilhelm Wundt set up the first psychology lab in Leipzig in 1875
Focused on aspects of the mind that could be observed and measured in controlled conditions
Used introspection- studying the functions of the mind by asking people to describe their own thoughts, feelings and experiences
First person to suggest the mind could be studied empirically using experiments
Introspection was criticised for being subjective
Watson began the behaviourist movement, studying observable stimulus-response behaviour
Aimed to be more subjective
Learning approach
Emphasises the role of the environment and experience in learning behaviours
Only considers observable behaviour and uses methods like lab experiments to gain control of variables and look for cause and effect relationships
Highly objective
Uses animal research as humans and animals learn by the same mechanisms
Learning by association
First investigated by Pavlov
If a stimulus is paired multiple times with an existing stimulus-response, an association is made between the two stimuli
Stimulus generalisation- found that other stimuli similar to the conditioned stimulus also lead to the conditioned response
Stimulus discrimination- if many different neutral stimuli are presented but only one is paired with the unconditioned stimulus, only one stimulus will become conditioned
Temporal contiguity- unconditioned stimulus and neutral stimulus have to be paired at the same time
Unconditioned stimulus = unconditioned response
Neutral stimulus = no response
Unconditioned stimulus + neutral stimulus = unconditioned response
Conditioned stimulus = conditioned response
:) Used in developing treatments for mental illnesses such as systematic desensitisation to treat phobias, which has been found to be very effective
:) Very scientific- use of lab experiments and scientific method increases reliability and internal validity
:( Overly reductionist as it explains behaviour in terms of stimulus and response, ignores roles of mental processes and biological factors
:( Uses animal research- may lack generalisability, risk of ethical issues
:( Environmental determinism
Learning by consequences
First investigated by Skinner
Positive reinforcement- positive consequence to the action
Negative reinforcement- removal of something unpleasant as a positive consequence to the action
Punishment- negative consequence to the action
Rats placed in a cage where food would only be delivered if they pressed a lever
Rats quickly learned to press the lever and would continue until they were full
Variation where the box gave the rats electric shocks until they pressed a lever
Quickly learned to press the lever again
:) Used for token economies, which have been shown to be effective in treating behaviours like aggression in prisons
:( 69% DNA shared between humans and rats- cannot extrapolate, hard to generalise results
:( Ethical issues- causing harm to the rats by electrocuting them
We learn by observing others
Similar to behaviourist- both assume most behaviour is learnt and are considered learning approaches, but SLT says we can learn just by observing others
Involves modelling and imitation
Vicarious reinforcement- if we see a model's behaviour being reinforced, we are more likely to imitate that behaviour
Vicarious punishment- if we see a model's behaviour being punished, we are less likely to imitate that behaviour
Pay particular attention to role models (people we identify with most) and learn from their behaviour
Most likely to imitate if the role model is similar to them
Mediational processes
Attention- observing someone doing a behaviour
Retention- remembering the behaviour
Motivation- wanting to do it
Motor reproduction- being able to do it
Children observed an adult role model either being aggressive or nice to a Bobo doll, or no adult at all (control group)
They were most likely to act aggressive if they had seen a role model also act aggressive
Were more likely to imitate if the adult was the same gender as them
Second study- children saw adult be rewarded with sweets, punished with shouting, or no consequences
Those who saw reward were much more likely to act aggressively
:) Lab experiments- could control extraneous variables like other toys and time spent in room, high internal validity
:) Found consistent results when repeated, reliable
:( Artificial and strange environment, lacks ecological validity
:( Some children may have played with Bobo dolls before and known you are supposed to hit them- extraneous variable, may reduce internal validity
:) Accepts that cognitive processes have an influence on learning and it is not just an automatic process- more holistic than behaviourist
:) Useful application, e.g. social skills training aims to model positive behaviour to reduce crime
:( Can’t directly observe mediational processes so cannot use the scientific method to study them
:( Most evidence comes from lab studies- low ecological validity
Emerged in 1960s after researchers criticised the behaviourist approach for not taking into account internal mental processes, assumes they should be studied using controlled lab studies
Assumptions:
Psychology must study mental processes
Internal processes can be studied in labs by inferring from behaviour
The human mind works like a computer, with input from senses and output in the form of behaviour
Types of mental processes- perception, attention, memory
Schemas- packets of info used to interpret the world, developed from past experiences and help predict what will happen in a new situation
Assimilation- experience matches schema and is assimilated into it, when an experience is remembered some details may be changed to assimilate into schema
Accommodation- experience doesn’t match schema, schema changes to accommodate new information
Uses theoretical models to represent internal mental processes
Allows processes to be broken down into component parts and think about what each section does
Information processing model- Input (sensory info), processing (mental operations), output (perception, memories, behaviour)
Uses inference to refine theoretical models
Cognitive neuroscience has recently emerged, investigates how different areas of the brain are involved in mental processes by using fMRI and PET scans
Combination of cognitive and biological approaches
:) Scientific- controlled lab settings so high validity, theoretical models are falsifiable
:) Can be applied to understand and treat mental disorders like with CBT
:( Reductionist- simplifies behaviour too much, ignores role of emotions and motivations
:( Could lack ecological validity- lab settings
Suggests human behaviour is caused by factors like genes, neurochemicals and physical structures
Assumptions:
CNS has a very strong influence on behaviour
Genetic make-up of individuals influences their behaviours
Chemicals like hormones and neurotransmitters influence behaviour
CNS allows communication between the environment and the brain by passing messages throughout the body
Genotype- genetic make-up of a person
Phenotype- the way genes are expressed in the behaviour or physical appearance of a person, can be influenced by the environment
Can observe the influence of genes using twin studies
Study monozygotic twins who have an identical genetic code, higher concordance rate than dizygotic twins may suggest a genetic influence
Not 100% accurate, genotype is the same but phenotype may be different
Evolution- process by which a species adapts to its environment
Genetic info is passed on through generations when the resulting behaviour aids survival and reproduction
:) Highly scientific methods that use empirical and objective evidence, e.g. brain scans and twin studies
:) Understanding influence of genetics on behaviour means we can help people who suffer from genetically inherited conditions
:( Biological determinism- says we have no control over who we are and no ability to change, means we can’t hold people accountable for their behaviour
:( Overly reductionist, ignores social and cultural causes of behaviour
Developed by Sigmund Freud in the late 19th century
Key assumption- most behaviour is caused by unconscious mind
Three parts of the consciousness
Conscious- accessed information
Preconscious- information that is not currently being accessed but can be
Unconscious- inaccessible information, contains info that the conscious would find uncomfortable so is protected by defence mechanisms
Tripartite structure of personality
Id- present from birth, unconscious, contains primitive desires, demands instant gratification
Ego- develops in anal stage, mediator between id and superego
Superego- develops in phallic stage, conscience that punishes the person with guilt when giving in to the id and pushes the person to be good
Defence mechanisms
Repression- ego pushes desires of the id back into the unconscious
Denial- ego ignores superego and refuses to believe it has given in to the id, stops feelings of guilt
Displacement- redirection of impulses away from the target to safer ones
Psychosexual stages
Oral (0-18 months)- focus on mouth, gratification gained from feeding. Id is dominant
Anal (18 months-3 years)- focus on anus, gratification gained from pooping. Ego develops through toilet training
Anally retentive- nervous about toilet
Anally expulsive- overly obsessed with using toilet
Phallic (3-6 years)- focus on penis, child passes through Oedipus or Electra complex. Gender identity and superego develop
Oedipus complex- attraction to mother and jealousy of father
Castration anxiety- worry that his father will remove his penis
Electra complex- attraction to father and distrust of mother
Penis envy- anger at mother because girls think she stole their penis
Latent (6-12 years)- no precise focus, conflicts of previous three stages are repressed
Genital (12 years+)- focus on own reproductive organs, sexual energy directed towards relationships with sexual partners
Libido- desire for sex, focus of id for rest of life
Psychological disorders are caused by repressed psychological traumas from the first 3 stages that shape the impulses of the id later in life
Oral fixation- habits like smoking and biting nails
Anally expulsive- emotional, prone to anger, messy
Anally retentive- neat, organised and careful
Phallic fixation- jealous, anxious
:) Little Hans- fear of horses, 5 years old and curious about penis (phallic stage) and wanted all of his mother’s attention (Oedipus complex), Freud thought Hans was scared of his father and fear was displaced to horses :( Case studies lack generalisability :( Self-report from Hans’ father, may not be objective
:) First focus on psychological causes for psychological disorders
:( Unscientific- focus on patients’ dreams so not based on empirical evidence, cannot test unconscious so theories are unfalsifiable
:( Case studies have low population validity
:( Gender bias- overemphasises male sexuality and relies on outdated gender stereotypes
:( Cultural bias- developed within and for Western society
Rejects reductionist and deterministic ideas about human motivation and behaviour
Focuses on the subjective experience of being human, believes everyone is unique and results can never be generalised
Rejects the scientific method
Led to the development of humanistic counselling
Key ideas about humans
Cannot be reduced to components
All unique
Conscious and aware of themselves
Have free will and responsibility for their actions
Purposeful and creative
Created in response to the behaviourist approach
Can only fulfil a level if every level below it is met
Have to achieve all to achieve self-actualisation
Self-actualisation- becoming the best person you can be and achieving your full potential as a human being, everyone has a drive to achieve it
Most people do not achieve it
Involves creative expression, experiencing beauty, and knowledge and understanding
Because everyone is unique, everyone will self-actualise in different ways
Created by Rogers
Personal growth is stopped by experiencing conditional positive regard, where people have to meet conditions of worth to have self-worth
Limits chances of achieving self-actualisation, causes incongruence
Can be set by themselves or someone else
Three selves that need to be integrated
Real self- who you really are
Self-concept- who you think you are
Ideal self- who you want to be
Congruence- when the ideal self and the self-concept are the same
When this is met, the person will self-actualise
Client-centred therapy aims to achieve congruence and self-actualisation by providing unconditional positive regard where the client is accepted for who they are without judgement
Removes conditions of worth
Therapist is non-directive and seeks to reflect back to the client whatever they disclose in an environment of trust and mutual regard
:) Allows for personal growth and accepts the idea of free will, which seems intuitively correct
:) Therapy has been shown to be effective and is a good alternative to psychoanalysis or medication
:( Cultural bias- concepts like hierarchy of needs are biased towards individualistic cultures
:( Not scientific because it is based on vague concepts, e.g. cannot operationalise self-actualisation so cannot make predictions involving it
:( Ignores biological explanations of behaviour so doesn’t offer useful treatments for mental disorders caused by biological factors
Free will | Soft determinism | Hard determinism |
---|---|---|
Humanistic | Cognitive | Psychodynamic |
SLT | Behaviourist | |
Biological |
Behaviourist- environmental determinism, behaviour is controlled by stimulus-response conditioning
SLT- soft determinism, behaviour is controlled by environmental forces but humans have free choice and personal responsibilities
Cognitive- soft determinism, behaviour is controlled by schemas and mediational processes but humans can choose which behaviour they attend to
Biological- biological determinism, behaviour is controlled by internal biological factors like genes and hormones
Psychodynamic- psychic determinism, behaviour is determined by unconscious drives and early childhood experiences
Humanistic- free will, humans have control over their environment and are capable of change
Nature | Both | Nurture |
---|---|---|
Biological | Psychodynamic | Behaviourist |
Cognitive | SLT | |
Humanistic |
Behaviourist- nurture, humans are born as a blank slate and behaviour is learned through classical and operant conditioning
SLT- nurture, behaviour is learnt through observing and imitating role models
Cognitive- nature and nurture, some cognitive mechanisms are innate but they are also shaped by experience
Biological- nature, behaviour is the result of innate biological factors
Psychodynamic- nature and nurture, behaviour is due to innate drives but shaped by early childhood experiences
Humanistic- mostly nurture, behaviour is shaped by environment as humans strive to achieve self-actualisation
Reductionism | Both | Holism |
---|---|---|
Behaviourist | Psychodynamic | Humanistic |
Cognitive | ||
Biological | ||
SLT |
Behaviourist- environmental reductionism, behaviour is broken down into simple stimulus-response associations
SLT- environmental reductionism, behaviour is due to observing and imitating role models
Cognitive- environmental reductionism, breaks processes into simpler parts like in theoretical models
Biological- biological reductionism, behaviour is broken down into biological structures and processes
Psychodynamic- reductionism and holism, behaviour is reduced to innate drives but takes account of multiple aspects of human behaviour
Humanistic- holism, focuses on understanding all aspects of human experience
Idiographic | Both | Nomothetic |
---|---|---|
Humanistic | Psychodynamic | Behaviourist |
Cognitive | ||
Biological | ||
SLT |
Behaviourist- nomothetic, attempts to establish general laws of behaviour, as behaviour is due to stimulus-response associations
SLT- nomothetic, attempts to establish general laws of behaviour, such as vicarious reinforcement
Cognitive- nomothetic, attempts to establish general laws of cognitive processing
Biological- nomothetic, attempts to establish general laws using human physiological explanations
Psychodynamic- idiographic and nomothetic, relies on case studies and unique childhood experiences, but attempts to establish general laws of behaviour
Humanistic- idiographic, focuses on the subjective human experience and makes no attempt to establish general laws
Scientific | Mostly scientific | Unscientific |
---|---|---|
Behaviourist | Cognitive | Psychodynamic |
Biological | SLT | Humanistic |
Behaviourist- scientific, uses the scientific method of investigation and relies on lab studies
SLT- mostly scientific, uses lab studies but takes account of mediational processes
Cognitive- mostly scientific, uses lab studies but cannot directly observe cognitive processes
Biological- scientific, uses the scientific method of investigation and relies on lab studies
Psychodynamic- not scientific, examines many concepts and theories that cannot be empirically tested and relies on subjective interpretation
Humanistic- not scientific, rejects scientific method and therefore cannot provide empirical evidence