Speech
Central processing vs. peripheral processing - how the audience is thinking
-central: audience is actively engaged with message and information/facts
-peripheral: audiences opinion is based on superficial persuasion, and is swayed easily, without engaging much with the core message
Write speeches for the ear
Not concerned about how it looks on paper. Focus is on how it will sound
Vocal fillers
Fill pauses with “um” “ah” thinking about what to say next
Mumbling
Quiet or indistinct
Scanning
Either: words are broken syllables or speaker moves their gaze to different people
Talking head
Talking directly to the audience/camera
Enlighten vs. advocate
"enlighten" focuses on imparting information
"advocate" focuses on persuasion and taking a stance
Backstory
Set up of events before the main story
problem/solution organizational pattern in informative and persuasive speaking
Present problem, present one or more solutions
What do emotion and reasoning do for a speech audience?
Reveal your personal moral standards, stress your expertise on the topic, and emphasize commonality with audience
Maslow’s Hierarchy of needs
a theory of human motivation; physiological needs<safety needs<love and belonging<esteem<self-actualization
Claim
a statement essentially arguable but used as a primary point to support or prove an argument
Evidence
Support for an argument
One-sided message vs two-sided message
One sided: evidence for only one side of argument/ two sided: present both sides of evidence
Comparative advantage pattern of arrangement for persuasive speaking
Compares opinions and convincing why one is better
Refutation pattern of arrangement for persuasive speaking
presenting and then disproving opposing arguments
Persuasive speeches that reaffirm audience values
Beliefs
Impact how an audience receives a message
Etymology
study of the origin and history of words
Characteristics of the speaker’s voice
Intonation: rise and fall of pitch
Enthusiasm
Confidence
Deliberate pauses, not vocal pauses
From the text (chapters 12,13,15,16,17)
Connotative vs. denotative meaning
Denotative: the literal or dictionary meaning of a word or phase
Connotative: the meaning suggested by the association or emotions triggered by a word or phrase
Thesaurus :A book of synonyms
Concrete vs. abstract words
Concrete words: words that refer to tangible objects
Abstract words: words that refer to ideas or concepts
Clutter :discourse that takes many more words than are necessary to express an ideas
Rhythm: the pattern of sound in a speech created by the choice and arrangement of words
Alliteration: repetition of the initial consonant sound of close or adjoining words
Antithesis: the juxtaposition of contrasting ideas, usually in parallel structures
Extemporaneous speaking :a carefully prepared and rehearsed speech that is presented from a brief set of notes
Conversational quality :presenting a speech so it sounds spontaneous no matter how many times it has been rehearsed
Inflections :changes in the pitch or tone of a speaker's voice
Dialect :a variety of a language distinguished by variations of accent,grammer, or vocabulary
Kinesics: the study of body motions as a systematic mode of communication
Gestures : motions of a speakers hands or arms during a speech
Process :a systematic series of actions that leads to a specific result or product
claims/questions of policy:a question about whether a specific course of action should or should not be taken
Question of Value :a question about the worth, rightness, morality and so forth of an idea or action
Question of fact: a question about the truth or falsity of an assertion
Pathos :the name used by aristotle for what modern students of communication refer tri as emotional appeal
Ethos :the name used by aristotle if what modern students of communication refer to as credibility
Logos: the name used by aristotle for the logical appeal of a speaker. The two major elements of logos are evidence and reasoning
Persuasion :the process of creating, reinforcing, or changing peoples beliefs or actions
comparison/contrast : compare: a statement of the similarities among two or more people events or ideas
Contrast: a statement if the differences among two or more people events or ideas
Personalize : to present one's ideas in human terms that relate in some fashion to the experience of the audience
Mental dialog with the the audience :the mental give and take between speaker and listener during a persuasive speech
Speech to gain passive agreement :
Speech to gain immediate action :a persuasive speech in which the speakers goal is to convince the audience to take action in support of a given policy
Need :the first basic issue in analyzing a question of policy: is there a serious problem or need that requires a change from current policy
Burden of proof : the obligation facing a persuasive speaker to prove that a change from current policy is necessary
Plan :the second basic issue in analyzing a question of policy: is there a problem with current policy, does the speaker have a plan to solve the problem?
Practicality:the third basic issue in analyzing a question of policy: will the speaker's plan solve the problem? Will it create new or more serious problems?
Monroe’s Motivated Sequence :a method of organizing persuasive speeches that seek immediate action. The five steps of the motivated sequence are attention, need, satisfaction, visualization, and action
Initial credibility : the credibility of a speaker before she or he starts to speak
Derived credibility :the credibility of a speaker produced by everything she or he says and does during the speech
Terminal credibility : the credibility of a speaker at the end if the speech
Creation common ground :a technique in which a speaker connects himself or herself with the values, attitudes or experiences if the audience
Reasoning from specific instances :reasoning that moves from particular facts to a general conclusion
Reasoning from principle :reasoning that moves from a general principle to a specific conclusion
Fallacy in reasoning :an error in reasoning
Hasty generalization :a fallacy in which a speaker jumps to a general conclusion on the basis of insufficient evidence
False cause :a fallacy i9n which a speaker mistakenly assumes that because one event follies another the first event is the cause of the second
Invalid analogy :an analogy in which the two cases begin compared are not essentially alike
Bandwagon :a fallacy which assumes that because something is popular, it is therefore good correct or desirable
Red herring :a fallacy that introduces an irrelevant issue to divert attention from the subject under discussion
Ad Hominem :a fallacy that attacks the person rather than dealing with the real issue in dispute
either/or :a fallacy that forces listeners to choose between two alternatives when more than two alternatives exists
Slippery slope :a fallacy which assumes that taking a first step will lead to subsequent steps that cannot be prevented
Appeal to tradition :a fallacy which assumes that something old is automatically better than something new
Appeal to novelty :a fallacy which assumes that something new is automatically better than something old