The performance appraisal process consists of several critical steps that organizations follow to evaluate employee performance effectively.
Determine Purpose of Appraisal
Establish the reasons for evaluating employee performance, such as:
Providing Feedback: Meetings between supervisors and employees to discuss strengths and weaknesses.
Determining Salary Increases: Assessing employee salaries based on job descriptions and KSAOs (Knowledge, Skills, Abilities, and Other characteristics).
Making Promotion Decisions: Promotions can be based on seniority or job performance, ensuring alignment with job requirements.
Making Termination Decisions: Terminations based on performance evaluations after providing necessary feedback and support.
Conducting Personnel Research: Evaluating the effectiveness of appraisal methods and methods of correlating job performance and evaluation results.
Identify Environmental and Cultural Limitations
Recognize factors that could influence performance evaluations; for instance, teamwork-oriented cultures may require peer evaluations.
Determine Who Will Evaluate Performance
Identify sources of evaluation:
Supervisors: Most common evaluators (74% of evaluations).
Peers: Provide reliable feedback when familiar with the employee being rated.
Subordinates: Difficult to obtain ratings due to fear of backlash.
Customers: Informal feedback on performance.
Self-Appraisals: Employees assess their performance, usually not used for administrative actions.
Select the Best Appraisal Methods
Key decisions include:
Focus of Appraisal Dimensions:
Trait-Focused: Attributes like dependability and courtesy (may lead to defensiveness).
Competency-Focused: Knowledge, skills, and abilities (better feedback).
Task-Focused: Based on similarities of tasks performed.
Goal-Focused: Goals that the employee is expected to accomplish.
Measurement and Rating: Methods include rank order, paired comparison, and forced distribution of performance ratings.
Train Raters
Training supervisors enhances accuracy and reduces errors in performance evaluations. Frame-of-reference training is beneficial in providing job-related information and examples.
Observe and Document Performance
Supervisors should document critical incidents (specific observed behaviors) to provide concrete examples during performance evaluations.
Documentation is crucial for fostering focus on behaviors, aiding recall during evaluations, and defending against legal actions.
Evaluate Performance
Review objective data and critical incidents before assigning performance ratings.
Be aware of common rating errors: leniency error (high ratings for all), central tendency (middle ratings for all), and strictness error (low ratings for all).
Communicate Appraisal Results to Employees
Feedback to employees is essential for identifying areas for further training.
Techniques for effective appraisal interviews include allocating time properly, scheduling, and preparing adequately.
Make Personnel Decisions
Use appraisal results to guide decisions regarding:
Training programs
Raises and promotions
Terminations, based on specific legal justifications (e.g., probation, rule violations).
Monitor the Fairness of the Appraisal Process
Continually assess the fairness and effectiveness of the appraisal methods used to ensure that they meet the organization's objectives.