Continued focus on research in this class and upcoming neuroscience chapter.
Importance of understanding participation in research studies.
Average response rate for research participation: 5-8%.
Anecdotal story about personal experience participating in a survey at the mall;
Interaction with a researcher led to participation in a gum flavor study.
Volunteering for research is unusual; typically participants are compensated.
The difficulty in gathering participants can affect study quality.
Personal account of a longitudinal study that was rejected for publication due to participant recruitment method.
Importance of compensation for participation highlighted in research.
Research generally takes place in:
Universities and research hospitals.
Distinction between two-year and four-year institutions.
Four-year institutions have larger classes and hire faculty who are primarily researchers.
Faculty at two-year institutions often focus on teaching rather than research.
The term "publish or perish" emphasized for tenure in research positions.
Steps of the scientific method as a guide for conducting research.
Step 1: Identify a Question and Review Literature
Formulate a question of interest (e.g., infidelity in relationships).
Review peer-reviewed literature that relates to the question.
Step 2: Develop a Testable Hypothesis
A hypothesis predicts the relationship between variables (e.g., infidelity leading to marital discord).
Importance of operational definitions to measure variables.
Step 3: Select a Research Method
Different research methods include surveys and experiments.
Step 4: Analyze Data
Determine whether there’s support for the hypothesis; truth may not be fully proven, only supported.
Step 5: Seek Scientific Review
Submit research for peer review before publication; often a lengthy process.
Step 6: Build a Theory
Theories explain relationships between concepts grounded in data and observations.
Key elements include:
Nature and purpose of the research.
Risks involved with participation.
Volunteer nature of the study.
Information about the principal investigator (PI).
Consent for publication with de-identified data.
Discussion of the Tuskegee Experiment as a case study in research ethics:
Conducted from 1932 to 1972, it targeted poor African American males under false pretenses.
Participants were misled to believe they were being treated for "bad blood"; intentionally left untreated for syphilis to study disease progression.
Highlighted dangers of unethical practices in research, leading to serious consequences for participants.