A and EA Final chapters 10-13
Chapter 10- School
Secondary school- developed countries
US
Comprehensive high school curriculum- reading, math, science, social studies, PE, art, music
Flexibility in career decisions- learning a career or trade
Control in states/local districts
Europe
Types: college, vocational, & professional
Identify career paths earlier (15-16)
National level system
Developing countries
Rising enrollment- highest for elementary- dropoff for secondary and tertiary school
Illiteracy decreasing
Teacher Quantity & Quality
Inadequate Funding
Discrepancies
Location: Urban > Rural
Social Class: High/Mid > Low
Gender: Males > Females
International comparisons
Developed > Developing
Japan > US
Value education more
Longer school days
Longer school year
Vertically building national curriculum
Negative: Focus on rote memorization
Effort over ability
“Cram” Schools/Tutoring
School and class size
Optimal size 500-1000
Class size (20-40)- no effect
Large schools
Less attachment to school and teachers
More diverse class offerings and activities
Small schools
Less diverse options
Higher participation and leadership
School start time
Circadian Rhythm
Morning: Children & Adults
Evening: Adolescents (to age ~21)
Later Start Times Increase
Hours slept
Attendance
Grades
Achievement test scores
Well-being
School climate
School Climate (Rutter)
Supportive & involved
High expectations
Behavioral control
Outcomes
Achievement
Behavior/Delinquency
Mental health
Engagement/Motivation
Parents- western setting
Genes and environment
Academic involvement- parents who care about their kids grades
School involvement- involved with school activities, teachers, what their kids are doing and what they
are learning
Direct- involvement (authoritative)- foster characteristics that help kids be successful in school
Indirect- child characteristics (authoritarian and permissive)
Cultural context- Asian American families don't fit well (fit both authoritative and authoritarian)
Peers and friends
Friends
More influence than parents
Beyond selective association- risk behavior, lower achiever friends get pulled up by their higher
achieving friends, encourage them to study and help with homework
Parents influence friends
Peers
Social comparison- feeling bad about yourself (low achieving comparing to high achieving)
Big fish in little pond effect
Work and leisure
Work
10+ hours per week is detrimental
Effects beyond self-selection- thinking having a job is more important than school because they
are not doing well at school- working more makes you do worse at school
More likely to cut class, do your homework, negative mental health symptoms, less sleep
Leisure
Socializing negative impact
Organized activities positive impact
Academic achievement
Social class
IQ- lower, passive genotype
Nutrition- not be able to afford healthy food
Health care- not able to afford health care, leads to chronic health problems
School quality- lower
Family stressors
Parenting style and involvement
Ethnic differences in US
Asian American
Parental expectations
Effort > ability
Academically oriented friends
Prejudice & Discrimination
Latinx – strong association
African American – weaker association
“Acting white”
Immigrant paradox
Gender differences
Girls > Boys
Grades
Graduation rates
Reasons why
Enjoy school more
More supportive relationships
More time doing homework
Gifted kids characteristics
Precocity
Independence
Drive for mastery
Excellence in information processing
Advanced Placement (AP) classes
Social Difficulties
Disabilities
Learning disabilities
Prevalence: 8%
Gender: Males 2x Females
Comorbid:
ADHD
Social & emotional problems
Early Intervention
ADHD
Prevalence: 9.5%
Gender: Males >2x Females
Comorbid:
LD
Social & emotional problems
Medication & Behavioral Therapy
High school dropouts
Predictors
Academic: low grades/repeat grade
Personal: low IQ, LD, male, & Latinx
Parent education & income
Outcomes
Internalizing issues (e.g., depression)
Externalizing issues (e.g., substance use)
Unemployment/Lower wages
Tertiary school
Student characteristics
Gender
Attend: Females (70%) > Males (55%)
Degree: Females (46%) > Males (36%)
Majors
Graduate Programs: 60% women
Ethnicity
SES confound
Asian (85%) > Whites and Blacks (61%) > Latinx (59%)
Educational success
Average time: 5-6 years
Financial reasons
Other: change majors, study abroad, etc
Retention (40% drop out)
Prior academic performance
Ethnicity
SES
Personal issues
Intervention to Increase Retention
Benefits of college
Student Satisfaction High
Short-term
Academic
Non-academic
Long term
Career and income (60% higher)
Social and psychological
Gap year
US (2%) < Europe/Australia
Motivation For Taking
Diverse Experiences
Benefits:
Academic motivation
major/career direction
Academic performance
Employability
Chapter 11- Work
Traditional cultures
Forms of work
Hunting, fishing, farming
Gathering, house work chores/childcare
Globalization/Industrialization
Pros
Access to electricity, education, and medical care
Income, respect, skills/contacts
Signs of improvement now
Cons
Brutal work, long hours, low pay
Debt bondage
Commercial sexual exploitation
Work in the West
History
17th-18th Centuries – Agriculture
18th-19th Centuries – Industrialization
20th Century
Age of Adolescence (1890-1920)
After WWII – part-time work
1950-2000: 1/2 work
2000-present: ~1/3 to 1/4 work
Decreased demand for low wage jobs
Increased minimum wage
Increased demand of high school
Workplace experiences
First jobs
Girls- babysitting
Boys- yardwork
High school
Restaurant or retail
Repetitive and monotonous
Unconnected to education/career
Work outcomes- negative (>10 hours per week )
Academic performance (Ch 10)
Worse sleep, diet, & exercise
More anxiety & depression
Alcohol, cigarettes, & drugs
Stress relief
Disposable income
Occupational deviance
Work outcomes- positive
Responsibility/Independence
Time Management
Money Management
Social Skills
Work Ethic/Integrity
Educational Attainment
Employment in EA
Work in a knowledge economy
Math and reading
Collaborating with diverse people
Oral and written communication
Ability to learn/adapt
Information technology
Problem solving
Occupational training- US
~30% work after high school
Government program for low SES
Finish high school/GED
Job training (up to 3 years)
Employment assistance
Benefits
Higher literacy/numeracy
Higher rate of high school completion/GED
Working more hours and higher pay
Fewer arrests
Occupational training- western europe
Apprenticeship Model
Features
Age 16 (2-3 years)
Part-time school
Training in workplace
School to Work Pipeline
Transparency v. Permeability
Occupational goals stages
Crystallization- (14-18) develop tentative goal and seek information
Specification- (18-21) firm vocational goal and pursue education/training
Implementation (21-24) finish training and seek employment
Stabilization (25-35) establish career and gain experience
Consolization (35+) gain expertise and seek advancement
Influences on occupational goals
Personality characteristics
Realistics, investigative, artistic, social, enterprising, conventional
Gender
Women’s jobs- service sector, lower pay (~83%)
Why
Gender socialization
Work-family balance (second shift)
Identity based work
Systematic exploration
Meandering or drifting
Military service
Non voluntary
Trauma exposure
Internalizing and externalizing problems
therapy/intervention
Voluntary
Self-confidence & discipline
Collaboration & leadership skills
Educational/Occupational opportunities
Unemployment
EA (2x) > Adults
Blacks > Other Ethnicities
Outcomes: Depression, Substance Use
Not in education, employment, or training (NEET)
Solutions: education, training, employment access
Community service
Motivation
Collectivistic – help others
Individualistic – intrinsic & extrinsic
Benefits
Academic- educational goals/performance
Personal- ideals, actual- ideal discrepancy
Social- build relationships (parents)
Civic- social problems and solutions
Chapter 12- Media
Rates of use
Digital Devices
88% of US adolescents have
Texting, social media, & internet
Earlier adoption than adults
Traditional Media (e.g., TV, Music, etc.)
Average Hours Total = 8
Gender Difference
Theories of media influence
Theories
Cultivation Theory (Gerbner)
Mean world syndrome
Social Learning Theory (Bandura)
Bo-Bo Doll
Uses and Gratifications Approach
People choose different media
People respond differently to same media
Five uses of media
Environment
Identity formation
Sensation seeking
Coping
Youth culture
Media and socialization
Identity Formation
Family influence decreases
Friends & media increase
Media
Broad socialization
Few restrictions
Market-driven/consumer control
Super peer
Social media
Higher on
Stress, anxiety, depression
Substance use (alcohol, drugs, tobacco)
Risky sexual behavior
Gambling
Self-injury and suicidal ideation
Pro- political activism
Lower on
Healthy eating behaviors
Body image
Qualitative Patterns (Brown):
intrigued, resisters, & disinterested
Television and aggression
Research
Correlational Studies – not causal
Field Studies - inconsistent
Longitudinal Study (Huesmann)
TV violence at 8 predicts aggression at ages 19 and 30 in males
Natural Experiment (MacBeth)
Pre: NoTel < Unitel & Multitel
Post (2 years after TV): No difference
Conclusions
Childhood Aggression
Influences Attitudes toward Violence
Relational Aggression
Electronic games and aggression
Prevalent Use
Similar to TV
Mostly correlational studies
Mixed evidence on behavior
Stronger evidence on attitudes
Uses and Gratifications Approach
Social aspects
Cathartic effect
Media and Sex
Non explicit content
Viewing
Gender stereotypes
Sexual attitudes
Sexual behaviors
Girls- intrigued, resisters, disinterested
Sexting
EA > adolescents
Girls- conflicted
Pornography
Sexually explicit- mixed
Sexually violent
Aggression and sexual violence
Adolescents
Users- advanced puberty, sensation seeking, family problems
Outcomes- permissive- sexual attitudes/behaviors, sexual gender-stereotypes, sexual aggression
Music- Hip-Hop
Criticisms
Misogyny
Violence
Racism
Research
Limited
Correlational
Uses and gratifications
Advertising- cigarettes
Targeting Adolescents
Cognitively vulnerable
Research
Lawsuits
Current trends
Less or anti-tobacco advertising
Electronic cigarettes
Developing countries
Social media
Communicate with Friends
Primarily Positive Effects (2012)
Some Concerns
Want to unplug
Others texting
Media use outcomes
Emotional
Well-being
Mental health
Life Satisfaction
Physical
Sleep
Activity
Weight
Cognitive
Academic
Executive
Function
Memory
Social
Aggression
Stereotypes
Peer Interaction
Western Values
Why Adolescence?
More freedom than children
Less traditional than adults
Identity formation
Individualism
Gender roles
Romantic relationships
Competition (e.g., sports)
Body image
Laptop study: independence & achievement
Bicultural Identity (Indipop)
Chapter 13- Problems and Resilience
Internalizing vs Externalizing
Internalizing problems
High parental control
Overcontrolled
Experience distress
Females > Males
Withdrawal, avoidance, somatic complaints, anxiety, depression
Externalizing problems
Low parental monitoring
Undercontrolled
Desire for excitement
Males > Females
Oppositionality, defiance, outbursts, aggression, temper
Crash risks
Inexperience of driving (<1 year)
Age (15-24)
Gender (boys> girls)
Risky driving behaviors- speeding, changing lanes aggressively, bad following distance, drunk driving
Friend influence
Personality characteristics
Optimistic bias
Preventing accidents
Driver education- no effect
Graduated driver licensing (GDL)
Learning license (permit)
Restricted license (curfew)
Full license
Substance use: US
Usage
Age trends
Propensity & Opportunity (Osgood)
Unstructured socializing
Types
Experimental use
Social use
Medicinal use
Addictive use
Delinquency and crime
Characteristics
Peak age (12-25)
Gender (male)
Ethnicity (black and latino)
SES (low)
Urban neighborhood
Reasons
Lack of adult supervision
Friend influence
Sensation seeking
Access to guns
Types of delinquency
Adolescence-limited delinquency (ALDs)
Occasional criminal activity (12-25)
No problems before or after
Life course persistent delinquents (LCPDs)
Neuropsychological deficits
High risk environment
Prone to criminal behavior as adults
Therapy and vocational training
Low success rate
Delinquency pattern established
Non-voluntary/Don’t have problem
Peer contagion
More effective approaches
Functional family therapy
Multisystemic approach
Risk factors for externalizing problems
Socialization sources
Family structure
Family process
Parenting styles
Friends’ influence
School
Neighborhood
Media
Legal system
Cultural beliefs
Individual factors
Gender
Ethnicity/SES
Aggressiveness
High sensation seeking
Low impulse control
Cognitive deficits
Optimistic bias
Depression
Depressed mood (37%) v. Major depressive disorder (6%)
Diathesis-Stress Model
Biological vulnerability
Environmental stresses
Females > Males
Body image
Focus on relationships (e.g., conflict/stress)
Focus on feelings (e.g., rumination)
Treatment for depression
Anti-Depression medications
Placebo design studies
Increased risk of suicide
Psychotherapy
Individual vs group
Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT)
Combination = Most Effective
Anxiety
Prevalence- 10% adolescents
Cause: gene environment interactions
Female > male
Timid/risk averse personality
Treatment
Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)
Medication
Combination most effective
Comorbidity (~⅓ also depressed)
Suicide
Across Countries
Within US
Ethnic differences
Gender differences
Risk Factors
Depression, family factors, substance abuse, & relationship conflict)
Three Pathways: chronic problems, severe mental illness, & acute crisis
Treatment- CBT and antidepressants
Eating disorders
Anorexia
Restricted eating
Fear of weight gain
Distorted body image
Weight: Low
Bulimia
Binging & Purging
Fear of weight gain
Recognize dysfunctional eating
Weight: Average
Prevalence: 3% of adolescents
Risk Factors
Culture (Thin ideal)
Media (Thin ideal)
Gender (Female)
Race/Ethnicity (White)
SES (middle to upper)
Genetic vulnerability (e.g., anxiety/depression)
Treatment
Anorexia: Often in-patient
Family Therapy > Individual or Medications
Bulimia: Outpatient CBT
Protective Factors
Resilience
High intelligence
Caring adult
Religious beliefs
School climate
Emerging adulthood
Werner’s Kauai Study
Longitudinal study of at-risk children
Childhood 1 of 3 resilience
Age 40- 5 of 6 resilience
Promise for intervention
Reappraise difficulties as strengths
Ability to leave environment
Turning point opportunities
Planful competence