ATTACHMENT & INTERNAL WORKING MODEL
Attachment: an affectional bond that is a relatively long-enduring tie in which the partner is important as a unique individual and is not interchangeable.
Bowlby characterized attachment as:
Proximity maintenance
Safe haven
Separation distress
Internal working model: Mental representations about attachment figures and what can be expected of them, ideas about the self, and how the self and others relate.
Ainsworth (1970) - Strange Situation | |
Aim | It measures the child’s attachment behavior based on how they react when the mother leaves and returns. |
Procedure | a series of eight episodes, each lasting about 3 minutes, designed to introduce separations and reunions between the caregiver and the infant, as well as introducing a stranger to the situation.
|
Findings |
|
Hazan and Shaver (1987) | |
Aim | Studied the attachment theory in relation to adult romantic relationships. |
Participants | 620 (205 males and 415 females) people of a self-selected sample between the ages of 14-82 with a mean age of 36. |
Procedure |
|
Findings |
|
DEVELOPMENT OF EMPATHY AND ToM
Empathy | The ability to understand and share another person's feelings, has been suggested to be essential for survival. Emotional aspects of empathy develop between 0-4 years old, while cognitive elements of empathy and ToM develop after age 4. |
Theory of Mind | The ability to attribute mental states such as beliefs, intentions, and attitudes to others. Korkmaz (2011) proposed that ToM development depends on the normal functioning of LTM and STM, language development, and executive functioning. The expression hypothesis: Suggests some children already have ToM understanding, but since it is abstract, they cannot express it until executive functioning develops and allows abstract thinking. It is developed in 4 stages:
|
Simner (1971) - Early Manifestations of Emotional Empathy | |
Aim | ? |
Participants | Newborns as young as 18-72 hours of age |
Procedure |
|
Findings |
|
Conclusion | Since young children cannot differentiate between themselves and others, they perceive the distress of others as their own |
Baron-Cohen et al. (1985) - Sally-Anne Task | |
Aim | To test the representational stage of ToM |
Participants | 27 children between the ages of 3.5 and 5.9 years old |
Procedure |
|
Findings |
|
Sabbagh et al. (2006) - Executive Functioning and ToM | |
Aim | Correlational study to compare US and Chinese preschoolers on executive functioning and ToM |
Participants | 109 participants from Beijing and 103 from the USA |
Procedure |
|
Findings |
|
Conclusion | While there does seem to be a correlation between ToM and executive functioning, cross-cultural comparisons cannot be made due to factors like the one-child law, which impacted Chinese children as they did not have siblings, which is thought to provide children with more opportunities for ToM to be developed. |
TRAUMA & RESILIENCE
Resilience: The capacity to adapt to stressful situations and “bounce back” from harmful effects of severe adversity.
Schoon and Bartley (2008) - Sources of Resilience:
Maintaining academic competence
Supportive and stable family environment
Wider social context
Employment
Sanders et al. (2002) - Positive Parenting Programme | |
Aim | Examined the effectiveness of The Triple P (Positive Parenting Program) in reducing children's disruptive behavior. |
Program | An evidence-based program that aims to:
By giving structured lessons on:
|
Procedure | They randomly assigned participants to either receive the program or be part of a control group. |
Findings | The program was effective in reducing children’s disruptive behavior. |
Mahoney et al. (2005) - Afterschool Programmes | |
Aim | To investigate the effectiveness of after-school program participation on academic performance |
Participants | 599 boys and girls (6–10 years old) from an urban, disadvantaged city in the USA. |
Procedure | A longitudinal study over a year under four patterns of care (after-school program care, parent care, combined parent/self-sibling care, and combined other-adult/self-sibling care) looked at the following:
|
Findings | After a year, the children in the after-school care program scored higher on academic performance and observed motivation than the children in the other three groups. |
Childhood Trauma: an emotionally painful, shocking, stressful, and sometimes life-threatening experience. It may or may not involve physical injuries and can result from witnessing distressing events.
Koluchova (1972) - Czech Twins Case Study | |
| |
DEVELOPING AS A LEARNER + BRAIN DEVELOPMENT
Vygotsky | Piaget | |
Role of social interaction | The fundamental factor for cognitive development (ZPD and Scaffolding) | Acknowledges the role of social interaction as necessary for development but doesn't emphasize it. |
Continuous Development vs. Stages | Does not propose specific stages but development as continuous, emphasizing the gradual acquisition of skills. | Has clear developmental stages, each with different qualities. (Sensorimotor, preoperational, concrete operational, formal operational) |
Implications for Education | Advocates for child-independent learning | Recommends guided learning using scaffoldings |
Cultural Context | No explicit references to the impact of culture on cognitive development | Strong emphasis on the impact of culture on cognitive development. (Cultural tools, language, and social norms) |
Samuel and Bryant (1984) - Challenges to Piaget’s Conservation Task | |
Aim | To challenge the standard Piagetian conservation task by changing parts of the procedure |
Participants | 252 children aged between 5 years 3 months to 8 years 3 months from the UK. |
Procedure |
|
Findings |
|
Conclusion |
|
Strengths |
|
Limitations |
|
Conner and Cross (2003) - Scaffolding | |
Aim | To investigate the effect of scaffolding from the perspective of mother-child interactions in an informal setting. |
Participants | 45 mother-child pairings were observed at 16, 26, 44, and 54 months |
Procedure |
|
Findings |
|
Conclusion |
|
_________________________________________________________________________________________
Gotgay et al. (2004) - Brain Development | |
Aim | To chart brain development from 4 to 21 years old |
Participants | 13 healthy children and teenagers from the USA |
Procedure |
|
Findings |
|
Conclusion |
|
Luby et al. (2012) - Nurturing Mothers and Brain Development | |
Aim | To investigate the effects that nurturing mothers have on the brain development of their children |
Participants | 92 children between the ages of 3 and 6 |
Procedure |
|
Findings | Children with nurturing mothers had hippocampi that were 10% larger than those of children with non-nurturing mothers |
Conclusion | The study concluded that nurturing mothers have a significant impact on the brain development of children |