The Second Amendment states: "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
Context of the late 1780s:
Addressed concerns of Anti-Federalists regarding insufficient protections for individual liberties against federal government power.
Reflects fears about federal overreach and state security rather than solely firearm ownership.
Gun policy can be regulated by both federal and state governments:
Federal regulation allowed under the Commerce Clause.
National laws include:
National Firearms Act: Initiated restrictions on firearm purchasing.
Gun Control Act of 1968: Banned mail sales of firearms and prohibited certain categories (felons, drug users) from purchasing guns.
Brady Bill (1993): Established a national gun owner database, mandated background checks, and implemented a five-day waiting period for gun purchases.
Federalism in gun policy:
Both state and federal governments regulate firearm laws.
Decided in 2010; related to the Second Amendment's application to the states via the Fourteenth Amendment.
Significant as the second Supreme Court case incorporating the Second Amendment after D.C. v. Heller (2008).
Established precedent that allowed for challenges to state laws related to gun ownership.
The right to privacy is not explicitly stated; it exists within the penumbras of several amendments:
Amendments involved: First, Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Ninth.
Ninth Amendment emphasizes rights not expressly granted to the government are reserved for the people.
The Griswold v. Connecticut (1965) case established fundamental privacy rights.
Precedent-setting ruling for future privacy cases.
Decided in 1973, linked to the right to privacy under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Controversial ruling that legalized abortion across all 50 states.
Context: Occurred during a liberal period in U.S. history and marked an activist period of the Supreme Court (1954-1973).
Future implications: Set the stage for further protections for women's rights.
The Fifth Amendment includes the Taking Clause of Eminent Domain:
Prohibits government from taking private property for public use without just compensation.
Eminent Domain defined as the government's right to appropriate private land for public purposes.
Requires compensation for the taken property, e.g., converting private land into a public park.
Kelo v. New London (2005): Relevant case where the Supreme Court allowed government to take property for private development seen as serving public use.
Affirmed that redevelopment projects can justify eminent domain claims.