Social Environment of Researchers
Influences on research include:
The questions that are asked
The methods used for research
Who conducts the experiments
How results are interpreted
Key Components
Systematic observation of the natural world
Rational interpretation of observations
Experimental Method
Vary one factor while holding others constant
Assume differences in outcomes are due to that single factor
Use of positive and negative controls
Assumes the natural world is stable, constant, and knowable
Conclusions extend beyond the experiment to the larger world
Prediction is a key test of scientific conclusions
Belk & Borden Example: Birth Control Pills
Research showed:
Fluctuating estrogen triggers ovulation
Constant estrogen suppresses ovulation
Resulted in production of oral contraceptives
Science cannot determine ethical decisions regarding birth control prescriptions
Limits of Science
Focuses on observable and measurable phenomena
Cannot address questions of morality, spirituality, or ethics
Can advise on methods but not on ethical implications
Importance of ELSI
Some funding requires attention to ethical, legal, and social issues
Citizen engagement in science fosters better decision-making in social issues
Democracy requires both scientific knowledge and alternative assessment methods
Steps in Scientific Inquiry
Make observations and develop hypotheses
Test hypotheses by attempting to disprove them
Peer review ensures rigor; results published contribute to collective knowledge
Continuous reevaluation and replication of experiments necessary
Initial Observations
Boys show greater accuracy than girls in throwing baseballs
Adult men more likely to engage in ball sports
Anthropological research indicates men are more likely hunters in societies
Hypothesis Formation
Hypothesis 1: Innate differences in brain coordination for throwing
Acknowledge alternative hypotheses exist
Deductive Reasoning
Generates specific predictions based on hypotheses
Formulated as an "If… then..." statement
Example of javelin throwing test to determine differences
Analyze data for accuracy differences
Consider alternative explanations for findings
Controls are essential for comparison in experimental design
Types of Control
Experimental group receives treatment; control group does not
Blind and double-blind experiments minimize bias
Importance of random assignment for credibility
Negative controls ensure validity of positive results
Positive controls confirm experimental conditions are met
Scientific Expectations
Cannot prove hypotheses conclusively; logic allows for unknown variables
Acceptance occurs when hypotheses withstand rigorous testing
Maintain an open mind due to evolving scientific understanding
Control Group Example
Boys versus girls in throwing experiments raise questions about socialization
Difficult to isolate single variables influencing outcomes
Implications of findings must be critically evaluated
Control Limitations
Ideal control would require equal upbringing but is practically impossible
Cultural norms and socialization of boys and girls differ greatly
Scientific disciplines involving humans face unique challenges:
Ethical constraints
Difficulty controlling all variables
Correlation vs. Causation
Correlation examines relationships, not causation
Example comparing breast cancer rates related to synthetic estrogen
Factors influencing correlation are complex and multi-faceted
Ethics in Animal Research
Heavily regulated; outcomes may not always apply to humans
Clomiphene citrate example illustrates discrepancies between animal and human reactions
Potential Bias in Experiments
Observer and subject expectations can influence outcomes
Placebo effect impacts perceived effectiveness
Use blind experiments to balance effects of bias
Critical Evaluation
Consider source and presentation of scientific reports
Evaluate how hypotheses were tested and limitations discussed
Investigate potential implications and societal impacts of scientific discoveries
Seek original research reports for informed conclusions
Bias in Research
Researchers may favor their preferred hypotheses
Funding influences research direction; societal norms play role
Example of hormone replacement therapy highlights changing views on menopausal treatments
The scientific method is a vital tool for knowledge acquisition but not the only approach.
Science addresses measurable questions but not ethical or moral concerns.
It plays a significant role in society and requires human behavior understanding.
Continuous questioning and exploration are essential in science.