VO

bow module 2

Chapter 2: Understanding & Evaluating Science

  • Social Environment of Researchers

    • Influences on research include:

      • The questions that are asked

      • The methods used for research

      • Who conducts the experiments

      • How results are interpreted

Science as a Way of Knowing

  • Key Components

    • Systematic observation of the natural world

    • Rational interpretation of observations

    • Experimental Method

      • Vary one factor while holding others constant

      • Assume differences in outcomes are due to that single factor

      • Use of positive and negative controls

      • Assumes the natural world is stable, constant, and knowable

      • Conclusions extend beyond the experiment to the larger world

      • Prediction is a key test of scientific conclusions

Power and Limitations of Science

  • Belk & Borden Example: Birth Control Pills

    • Research showed:

      • Fluctuating estrogen triggers ovulation

      • Constant estrogen suppresses ovulation

    • Resulted in production of oral contraceptives

    • Science cannot determine ethical decisions regarding birth control prescriptions

Science: Powerful but Amoral

  • Limits of Science

    • Focuses on observable and measurable phenomena

    • Cannot address questions of morality, spirituality, or ethics

    • Can advise on methods but not on ethical implications

    • Importance of ELSI

      • Some funding requires attention to ethical, legal, and social issues

    • Citizen engagement in science fosters better decision-making in social issues

    • Democracy requires both scientific knowledge and alternative assessment methods

The Process of Science

  • Steps in Scientific Inquiry

    • Make observations and develop hypotheses

    • Test hypotheses by attempting to disprove them

    • Peer review ensures rigor; results published contribute to collective knowledge

    • Continuous reevaluation and replication of experiments necessary

Example: Boys and Throwing

  • Initial Observations

    • Boys show greater accuracy than girls in throwing baseballs

    • Adult men more likely to engage in ball sports

    • Anthropological research indicates men are more likely hunters in societies

  • Hypothesis Formation

    • Hypothesis 1: Innate differences in brain coordination for throwing

    • Acknowledge alternative hypotheses exist

Testing Hypotheses with Deductive Reasoning

  • Deductive Reasoning

    • Generates specific predictions based on hypotheses

    • Formulated as an "If… then..." statement

    • Example of javelin throwing test to determine differences

    • Analyze data for accuracy differences

    • Consider alternative explanations for findings

Controls in Experiments

  • Controls are essential for comparison in experimental design

    • Types of Control

      • Experimental group receives treatment; control group does not

      • Blind and double-blind experiments minimize bias

    • Importance of random assignment for credibility

    • Negative controls ensure validity of positive results

    • Positive controls confirm experimental conditions are met

Evaluating Scientific Hypotheses

  • Scientific Expectations

    • Cannot prove hypotheses conclusively; logic allows for unknown variables

    • Acceptance occurs when hypotheses withstand rigorous testing

    • Maintain an open mind due to evolving scientific understanding

Understanding Control Groups

  • Control Group Example

    • Boys versus girls in throwing experiments raise questions about socialization

    • Difficult to isolate single variables influencing outcomes

    • Implications of findings must be critically evaluated

Ethical Considerations in Human Experimentation

  • Control Limitations

    • Ideal control would require equal upbringing but is practically impossible

    • Cultural norms and socialization of boys and girls differ greatly

  • Scientific disciplines involving humans face unique challenges:

    • Ethical constraints

    • Difficulty controlling all variables

Correlational Research

  • Correlation vs. Causation

    • Correlation examines relationships, not causation

    • Example comparing breast cancer rates related to synthetic estrogen

    • Factors influencing correlation are complex and multi-faceted

Role of Animal Models in Human Research

  • Ethics in Animal Research

    • Heavily regulated; outcomes may not always apply to humans

    • Clomiphene citrate example illustrates discrepancies between animal and human reactions

Controlled Experiments and Bias

  • Potential Bias in Experiments

    • Observer and subject expectations can influence outcomes

    • Placebo effect impacts perceived effectiveness

    • Use blind experiments to balance effects of bias

Media Presentation of Science

  • Critical Evaluation

    • Consider source and presentation of scientific reports

    • Evaluate how hypotheses were tested and limitations discussed

    • Investigate potential implications and societal impacts of scientific discoveries

    • Seek original research reports for informed conclusions

The Social Context of Science

  • Bias in Research

    • Researchers may favor their preferred hypotheses

    • Funding influences research direction; societal norms play role

    • Example of hormone replacement therapy highlights changing views on menopausal treatments

Summary

  • The scientific method is a vital tool for knowledge acquisition but not the only approach.

  • Science addresses measurable questions but not ethical or moral concerns.

  • It plays a significant role in society and requires human behavior understanding.

  • Continuous questioning and exploration are essential in science.