Trading Comparables
Also known as:
Analysis of selected publicly traded companies
Trading multiples
Comcos
Equity comps
Common stock comparisons
Definition: Comparables are entities or companies that are compared for valuation purposes to assess the trading information of a company.
Valuation Techniques
Two main categories:
Primary Techniques: Focus primarily on trading comparable analysis.
This is the main technique emphasized for pitches.
Other primary techniques include:
Discounted Cash Flow (DCF)
Leveraged Buyouts (LBO)
Acquisition Comparables
Secondary Techniques: Not as focused upon in this context.
Basics of Trading Comparable Analysis
It involves comparing a company with similar companies to arrive at a relative valuation.
Example scenario of valuation:
If valuing "Carrot", a suitable comparable could be "Pactiv Evergreen" as both operate in similar food packaging spaces.
The aim is to create a benchmark for the company's value relative to its peers at a specific point in time.
Market dynamics affect valuation; one company can be valued higher due to various competitive advantages such as market share, product quality, or growth rate.
Key observation: Investors may undervalue a company, creating a buying opportunity.
Enterprise Value (EV)
Definition: Total value of the company's operating assets.
Formula:
EV = Market Value of the Company + Total Debt - Cash
Rationale for subtracting cash: Cash does not contribute to operational asset value unless it is actively utilized (e.g., reinvested into the business).
Trading Multiples
Important ratio used: Price to Earnings Ratio (P/E) which represents a trading multiple.
General approach:
Value of company (or stock price) / Earnings per Share (EPS).
Common value drivers include:
Net Income
EBITDA
EBIT
Revenue
These drivers reflect a company’s financial performance and profitability where higher values typically justify a higher company valuation.
Example of Trading Comps
Analyzed "Carrot" with data presented via a financial tool (e.g., Bloomberg).
Carrot's EV was calculated at approximately $621 million, with revenue of $422 million and EBITDA of $61 million.
EV/EBITDA calculated as:
EV of Carrot ($621 million) / EBITDA ($61 million) = 10.
How this compares:
Pactiv Evergreen was valued at 7.6 times EBITDA, hence indicating it is cheaper than Carrot based on this multiple.
Contextual reasoning for valuation differences: Carrot might have a higher multiple due to market share growth, better product margins, and strong customer relationships with high-profile clients.
Industry Average
Average industry multiple for packaging companies is around 8.4 times.
Carrot trades at a 20% premium due to its advantageous market position and growth prospects.
Valuation Metrics Dependence on Company Stage
Different companies utilize various metrics based on their lifecycle stage:
Young or not profitable companies might use EBITDA or Revenue metrics instead of P/E due to lack of earnings.
Mature companies such as Coca-Cola are evaluated on P/E multiples since they have stable earnings and profitability metrics.
A cautionary note on valuation: Outliers or unusual valuations should be scrutinized, for instance when a company has an inflated P/E multiple due to abnormal earnings.
Tools and Resources
Recommendation to follow Kenji Explains video on comps for additional learning on constructing a comps model.