Overview of Attractiveness
Attractiveness plays a significant role in financial success for both men and women.
A study published in November 2012 indicates that beautiful people experience increased happiness, though the sources of that happiness differ by gender.
Economic Advantages for Men
Handsome men reap economic benefits such as higher wages.
The study led by Daniel Hamermesh, a labor economist from the University of Texas at Austin, suggests that beautiful men make significantly more than their less attractive peers.
Average wage increase for attractive men: 13% more over their careers compared to less attractive counterparts.
Psychological Benefits for Women
Women find joy in their attractiveness, where self-image and intrinsic value play a larger role.
Hamermesh notes that women perceive beauty as inherently valuable, stating, "They just feel bad if they’re ugly."
Cultural Effects
Hamermesh's research into "pulchronomics" (the economics of beauty) has led to controversy, particularly in discussions about homemaking women versus those in the workforce.
He encountered backlash from young audiences regarding his findings on beauty and economic participation.
Market Influence of Beauty
The pursuit of attractiveness drives a significant industry, with consumers spending substantial sums on cosmetic enhancements (e.g., $845 million on face-lifts in 2010).
Economists didn't significantly study beauty's economic effects until the mid-1990s, when Hamermesh and Jeff Biddle initiated research on how appearance impacts earnings.
Economic Theory of Beauty
Hamermesh claims that beauty is a scarce commodity that comes with a price.
Attractive individuals are preferred in hiring processes, especially during economic downturns like recessions.
"Lookism" in Various Professions
Appearance affects salaries across various professions, including unexpected fields:
Athletes: Unattractive quarterbacks earn 12% less than their attractive peers.
Academics: Attractive economics professors earn 6% more than their less attractive colleagues, as evidenced by ratings on platforms like RateMyProfessors.com.
Return on Cosmetic Investments
Research indicates that spending on beauty products yields poor financial returns, with only 4 cents returned in salary for every dollar spent.
Therefore, investment in cosmetic enhancements can often be seen as financially imprudent.
Expectancy Theory
Research indicates that unattractive individuals might benefit from lower expectations.
When they exceed these low expectations, they can receive rewards that attractive individuals might not.
Beauty Penalty
Attractive individuals may suffer from a "beauty penalty"; if their performance fails to meet higher societal expectations, they face wage depression over time.
Rick K. Wilson, a political scientist at Rice University, discusses these phenomena, emphasizing how expectations for attractive individuals can lead to diminished rewards when they don't live up to those standards.
Week 10 Article-How much is Being attractive Worth
Overview of Attractiveness
Attractiveness plays a significant role in financial success for both men and women.
A study published in November 2012 indicates that beautiful people experience increased happiness, though the sources of that happiness differ by gender.
Economic Advantages for Men
Handsome men reap economic benefits such as higher wages.
The study led by Daniel Hamermesh, a labor economist from the University of Texas at Austin, suggests that beautiful men make significantly more than their less attractive peers.
Average wage increase for attractive men: 13% more over their careers compared to less attractive counterparts.
Psychological Benefits for Women
Women find joy in their attractiveness, where self-image and intrinsic value play a larger role.
Hamermesh notes that women perceive beauty as inherently valuable, stating, "They just feel bad if they’re ugly."
Cultural Effects
Hamermesh's research into "pulchronomics" (the economics of beauty) has led to controversy, particularly in discussions about homemaking women versus those in the workforce.
He encountered backlash from young audiences regarding his findings on beauty and economic participation.
Market Influence of Beauty
The pursuit of attractiveness drives a significant industry, with consumers spending substantial sums on cosmetic enhancements (e.g., $845 million on face-lifts in 2010).
Economists didn't significantly study beauty's economic effects until the mid-1990s, when Hamermesh and Jeff Biddle initiated research on how appearance impacts earnings.
Economic Theory of Beauty
Hamermesh claims that beauty is a scarce commodity that comes with a price.
Attractive individuals are preferred in hiring processes, especially during economic downturns like recessions.
"Lookism" in Various Professions
Appearance affects salaries across various professions, including unexpected fields:
Athletes: Unattractive quarterbacks earn 12% less than their attractive peers.
Academics: Attractive economics professors earn 6% more than their less attractive colleagues, as evidenced by ratings on platforms like RateMyProfessors.com.
Return on Cosmetic Investments
Research indicates that spending on beauty products yields poor financial returns, with only 4 cents returned in salary for every dollar spent.
Therefore, investment in cosmetic enhancements can often be seen as financially imprudent.
Expectancy Theory
Research indicates that unattractive individuals might benefit from lower expectations.
When they exceed these low expectations, they can receive rewards that attractive individuals might not.
Beauty Penalty
Attractive individuals may suffer from a "beauty penalty"; if their performance fails to meet higher societal expectations, they face wage depression over time.
Rick K. Wilson, a political scientist at Rice University, discusses these phenomena, emphasizing how expectations for attractive individuals can lead to diminished rewards when they don't live up to those standards.