Module 1: Understanding Arguments: Premises, Conclusions, and Reasoning

Module 1: What is an Argument? Premises, Conclusions, Arguments

Basic Human Capacity and Linguistic Communication

/

  • As intellectual beings, humans possess the basic capacity to define and organize observations, classifying them based on similarities and differences.

  • As linguistic communicators, we re-present our perception of the world through this conceptual organization.

Concepts, Words, and Propositions

  • Concepts:

    • Are mental constructs, symbolized by words.

    • Identify a mentally organized class of things, based on fundamental similarities and differences.

    • A concept is not a complete thought.

  • Words:

    • Are audible or visual symbols that signify concepts.

    • Express a concept (e.g., noun or action).

  • Linguistic Grammar: Enables the communication of relationships between concepts.

  • Proposition:

    • A complete thought.

    • Conveys a meaning about the relationship between two or more concepts or particular things.

    • Is linguistically communicated by a statement (a sentence).

    • Example: “All butterflies are insects.” This is an indicative assertion about a factual relationship between the concepts “butterfly” and “insect.”

    • Is a building block of thought, speech, inference, and argumentation.

  • Statement:

    • A declarative (indicative) type of grammatical sentence.

    • A complete unit of thought.

    • Expresses a proposition (subject and predicate) that conveys the factual relationship between concepts.

  • Truth Value of Propositions:

    • A declarative proposition, communicated as a statement, asserts a complete thought and states a fact.

    • Every proposition is either objectively true or false.

    • Simple (categorical) propositions have a subject-predicate sentence structure in asserting fact.

Reasoning and Arguments

  • Reasoning:

    • One of three sources of how we arrive at knowledge or understanding of truth.

    • The process of inferring (deductively or inductively) a conclusion by relating two or more premises together.

    • This process takes the form of an argument (inference).

  • Argument:

    • A basic unit of reasoning.

    • A set of propositions, one of which (the conclusion) is supposedly supported and demonstrated by the other propositions (the premises).

    • Propositions are the building blocks of arguments.

  • Logic:

    • The science of correct reasoning.

    • Primarily concerned with evaluating the strength of an argument (e.g., the validity of its form).

    • Distinguishes between correct and incorrect reasoning.

    • Identifies and evaluates the reasons that ought to be persuasive (prescriptive).

Recognizing Arguments

  • Indicator Words: Serve as hints that a series of propositions is forming an inference.

    • Premise Indicators: Since, because, inasmuch as, given that, as, for, assuming that, supposing that, in that, owing to, also, in addition.

    • Conclusion Indicators: Therefore, thus, consequently, hence, so, in conclusion, it follows that, we may infer, implies/entails that, as a result, for that reason.

  • Contextual Identification: Sometimes, premises are identified by what is offered as reasons/support, and conclusions by what appears to be the author's main point if indicator words are absent.

  • Distinction between Argument and Explanation:

    • Argument: Reasons forward from premises to propose a conclusion that is not yet an established fact. The conclusion must be true before it is directly observed.

    • Explanation: Provides facts that account for how or why an already established fact has been caused. Explains why something already evident or known is the case.

Deductive Arguments

  • Characteristics:

    • A closed, well-defined set of premises and a conclusion.

    • The conclusion necessarily follows from the established premises because it is already contained within them (like a mathematical problem).

    • Intended aim: To make the conclusion certain on the basis of the premises.

    • Greatly relies upon precise, clear definitions, words, and classifications.

  • Validity:

    • All about form; like gears of a machine relating correctly.

    • Is all or nothing; an argument is either valid or invalid, not