Exam 2, Lec 3: Group Influence 1 and 2 Lecture Slides for Canvas
Topics to Include:
Social Facilitation
Social Loafing
Deindividuation
Groupthink
Group Polarization
Definition: Two or more people who interact, influence one another, and perceive themselves as "us."
Examples include:
Two jogging partners
Doctor and patient
People waiting at a bus stop
Historical Context:
Triplett's study (1889) on cyclists competing.
Original Definition: Performance improves on easy tasks when others are present.
New Definition: Strengthening of dominant responses in the presence of others.
Easy tasks: Performance benefits from presence.
Difficult tasks: Performance may suffer from presence.
Presence leads to arousal through:
Evaluation Apprehension: Concern about being judged.
Distraction: Presence can split attention.
Mere Presence: Even without evaluation, presence can affect behavior.
Definition: Individuals exert less effort in group work compared to individual tasks.
Studies show that people make less effort when they think they are in a group (Ingham et al., 1974).
Ways to reduce social loafing:
Make contributions identifiable.
Ensure tasks are appealing or engaging.
Definition: Loss of self-awareness and evaluation apprehension in group situations.
Leads to behaviors influenced by group norms, whether positive or negative.
Factors that elicit deindividuation include:
Group Size: Larger groups increase deindividuation.
Anonymity: Children in groups take more candy when unidentifiable.
Question: Are groups more effective? It can vary.
Historical Examples of Poor Group Decisions:
Bay of Pigs Invasion
Pearl Harbor
Challenger Space Shuttle
Definition: Faulty thinking in cohesive groups; suppressing dissent for consensus.
Characteristics of susceptible groups:
Highly cohesive
Homogeneous and isolated
Charismatic leadership
Strategies include:
Impartial facilitation
Assigning a 'devil’s advocate'
Soliciting opinions from outside experts.
Definition: Enhancement of members’ pre-existing tendencies through group discussions.
Example: Strengthening viewpoints on smoking (e.g., "Smoking should be banned!").
Influences:
Normative and informational pressures lead to extremes.
Occurs in communities, schools, and online interactions.
Topics to Include:
Social Facilitation
Social Loafing
Deindividuation
Groupthink
Group Polarization
Definition: Two or more people who interact, influence one another, and perceive themselves as "us."
Examples include:
Two jogging partners
Doctor and patient
People waiting at a bus stop
Historical Context:
Triplett's study (1889) on cyclists competing.
Original Definition: Performance improves on easy tasks when others are present.
New Definition: Strengthening of dominant responses in the presence of others.
Easy tasks: Performance benefits from presence.
Difficult tasks: Performance may suffer from presence.
Presence leads to arousal through:
Evaluation Apprehension: Concern about being judged.
Distraction: Presence can split attention.
Mere Presence: Even without evaluation, presence can affect behavior.
Definition: Individuals exert less effort in group work compared to individual tasks.
Studies show that people make less effort when they think they are in a group (Ingham et al., 1974).
Ways to reduce social loafing:
Make contributions identifiable.
Ensure tasks are appealing or engaging.
Definition: Loss of self-awareness and evaluation apprehension in group situations.
Leads to behaviors influenced by group norms, whether positive or negative.
Factors that elicit deindividuation include:
Group Size: Larger groups increase deindividuation.
Anonymity: Children in groups take more candy when unidentifiable.
Question: Are groups more effective? It can vary.
Historical Examples of Poor Group Decisions:
Bay of Pigs Invasion
Pearl Harbor
Challenger Space Shuttle
Definition: Faulty thinking in cohesive groups; suppressing dissent for consensus.
Characteristics of susceptible groups:
Highly cohesive
Homogeneous and isolated
Charismatic leadership
Strategies include:
Impartial facilitation
Assigning a 'devil’s advocate'
Soliciting opinions from outside experts.
Definition: Enhancement of members’ pre-existing tendencies through group discussions.
Example: Strengthening viewpoints on smoking (e.g., "Smoking should be banned!").
Influences:
Normative and informational pressures lead to extremes.
Occurs in communities, schools, and online interactions.