knowt ap exam guide logo

4.3: the industrial revolution and growth pole theory

the industrial revolution

hearth of the industrial revolution: England

  • abundance of natural resources (coal → fuel)

  • government promotion of industrialization

    • private property, laissez-faire policy, let businesses operate relatively freely

    • free speech → spread of ideas

  • infrastructure

    • canals, toll roads, railroads

  • massive urbanization movement

    • growth of cities = boom in factory jobs = boom in productivity

    • large unskilled workforce available for low wages

industrialization

  • England → Europe → United States (interrupted by Civil War) → Japan (50 years later) → South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, Hong Kong (post-WWII) → China (1979 start)

  • spread by imperialism, slowed by tariffs

  • imperialism boomed

    • need for new markets + raw materials (eg. rubber for bicycles)

    • Africa has lots of natural resources

      • infrastructure built by Europeans but built to benefit Europe → poverty in Africa, all natural resource extraction benefits Europe (exploitation)

  • industrialization = power

    • exceptions of this theory: India and Brazil (increase in population, decrease in manufacturing)

growth poles

  • growth pole theory posits that economic growth takes place at clusters, or “poles,” rather than being equally dispersed across a region, grouped by key industries (eg. automotive, aeronautical, agribusiness, electronics, steel) in an area

  • the key industry/core industry of an area obtains goods and services from suppliers (upstream linked industries) and providing goods and services to customers (downstream linked industries)

    • these are the direct effects; indirect effects include employee demand for key industries’ goods and services

  • expansion of the core industry means expansion of output, employment, related investments, new technologies, and new industrial sectors

  • regional development is unequal due to scale and agglomeration economies located near the growth pole

    • the relationship will be stronger and more likely to occur if the activity is more dependent on transportation; this can lead to the creation of secondary growth poles

4.3: the industrial revolution and growth pole theory

the industrial revolution

hearth of the industrial revolution: England

  • abundance of natural resources (coal → fuel)

  • government promotion of industrialization

    • private property, laissez-faire policy, let businesses operate relatively freely

    • free speech → spread of ideas

  • infrastructure

    • canals, toll roads, railroads

  • massive urbanization movement

    • growth of cities = boom in factory jobs = boom in productivity

    • large unskilled workforce available for low wages

industrialization

  • England → Europe → United States (interrupted by Civil War) → Japan (50 years later) → South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, Hong Kong (post-WWII) → China (1979 start)

  • spread by imperialism, slowed by tariffs

  • imperialism boomed

    • need for new markets + raw materials (eg. rubber for bicycles)

    • Africa has lots of natural resources

      • infrastructure built by Europeans but built to benefit Europe → poverty in Africa, all natural resource extraction benefits Europe (exploitation)

  • industrialization = power

    • exceptions of this theory: India and Brazil (increase in population, decrease in manufacturing)

growth poles

  • growth pole theory posits that economic growth takes place at clusters, or “poles,” rather than being equally dispersed across a region, grouped by key industries (eg. automotive, aeronautical, agribusiness, electronics, steel) in an area

  • the key industry/core industry of an area obtains goods and services from suppliers (upstream linked industries) and providing goods and services to customers (downstream linked industries)

    • these are the direct effects; indirect effects include employee demand for key industries’ goods and services

  • expansion of the core industry means expansion of output, employment, related investments, new technologies, and new industrial sectors

  • regional development is unequal due to scale and agglomeration economies located near the growth pole

    • the relationship will be stronger and more likely to occur if the activity is more dependent on transportation; this can lead to the creation of secondary growth poles

robot