4.3: the industrial revolution and growth pole theory
hearth of the industrial revolution: England
abundance of natural resources (coal → fuel)
government promotion of industrialization
private property, laissez-faire policy, let businesses operate relatively freely
free speech → spread of ideas
infrastructure
canals, toll roads, railroads
massive urbanization movement
growth of cities = boom in factory jobs = boom in productivity
large unskilled workforce available for low wages
industrialization
England → Europe → United States (interrupted by Civil War) → Japan (50 years later) → South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, Hong Kong (post-WWII) → China (1979 start)
spread by imperialism, slowed by tariffs
imperialism boomed
need for new markets + raw materials (eg. rubber for bicycles)
Africa has lots of natural resources
infrastructure built by Europeans but built to benefit Europe → poverty in Africa, all natural resource extraction benefits Europe (exploitation)
industrialization = power
exceptions of this theory: India and Brazil (increase in population, decrease in manufacturing)
growth pole theory posits that economic growth takes place at clusters, or “poles,” rather than being equally dispersed across a region, grouped by key industries (eg. automotive, aeronautical, agribusiness, electronics, steel) in an area
the key industry/core industry of an area obtains goods and services from suppliers (upstream linked industries) and providing goods and services to customers (downstream linked industries)
these are the direct effects; indirect effects include employee demand for key industries’ goods and services
expansion of the core industry means expansion of output, employment, related investments, new technologies, and new industrial sectors
regional development is unequal due to scale and agglomeration economies located near the growth pole
the relationship will be stronger and more likely to occur if the activity is more dependent on transportation; this can lead to the creation of secondary growth poles
hearth of the industrial revolution: England
abundance of natural resources (coal → fuel)
government promotion of industrialization
private property, laissez-faire policy, let businesses operate relatively freely
free speech → spread of ideas
infrastructure
canals, toll roads, railroads
massive urbanization movement
growth of cities = boom in factory jobs = boom in productivity
large unskilled workforce available for low wages
industrialization
England → Europe → United States (interrupted by Civil War) → Japan (50 years later) → South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, Hong Kong (post-WWII) → China (1979 start)
spread by imperialism, slowed by tariffs
imperialism boomed
need for new markets + raw materials (eg. rubber for bicycles)
Africa has lots of natural resources
infrastructure built by Europeans but built to benefit Europe → poverty in Africa, all natural resource extraction benefits Europe (exploitation)
industrialization = power
exceptions of this theory: India and Brazil (increase in population, decrease in manufacturing)
growth pole theory posits that economic growth takes place at clusters, or “poles,” rather than being equally dispersed across a region, grouped by key industries (eg. automotive, aeronautical, agribusiness, electronics, steel) in an area
the key industry/core industry of an area obtains goods and services from suppliers (upstream linked industries) and providing goods and services to customers (downstream linked industries)
these are the direct effects; indirect effects include employee demand for key industries’ goods and services
expansion of the core industry means expansion of output, employment, related investments, new technologies, and new industrial sectors
regional development is unequal due to scale and agglomeration economies located near the growth pole
the relationship will be stronger and more likely to occur if the activity is more dependent on transportation; this can lead to the creation of secondary growth poles