The first interpretation was put forward by Thomas L. Friedman, the notes New York Times columnist
- He asserts that the world is now what he describes as “flat,” a result of improved communications and free movement of capital
- In this view, the global economy has become a level playing field for the first time
- Societies around the world conform to free-market principles and practice
- Friedman argues that globalization is intensifying
SECOND
Canadian philosopher and novelist John Ralston Saul sees the world quite differently
He suggests that globalization is in retreat instead of advancements in innovation or a neo-conservative ideology
Saul sees a series of regional dislocations and inequalities resulting from the various successes and failures of globalization
- Most notably benefitting the more developed world and further disadvantaging the less developed world
Saul’s book, The Collapse of Globalism: And the Reinvention of the World, reads like a manifesto
- Designed to encourage the reader to care bout the depopulation in North America
- Get information on the inexorable spread and growth of Walmart
- Learn about the plight of the poor in the less developed world
- All of which are understood to be evidence of the failings of globalization
Not only is it in retreat, but it has also failed to make the world a better place
In his book, Saul dates the onset of globalization from 1971 claiming that it had emerged fully grown
- This year was the year the US went off the gold standard and settled on a floating dollar with the currency of other locations
In the mid 19990s, trade liberalization had proceeded apace
- Global Markets dominated and the WTO was in place to preside over the new global economy
Saul contends a key defeat for globalization was the 2003 US decision to invade Iraq without the support of other major powers
- It suggested that globalization might reverse because of an increasingly nationalistic US foreign policy
“What does the future hold if globalization is in retreat?
- A return to a world dominated by nation-states seems unlikely