Chapter 8 - Citizenship Education

Introduction to Citizenship and Citizenship Education

  • Ancient and modern conceptions of citizenship encourage active participation at local, national, and international levels.

  • Within a constitutional democracy like South Africa, the term 'citizenship' reflects two distinct formulations:

    • Citizenship as a legal status (to be a citizen).

    • Citizenship as a practice (to act as a citizen).

  • Learning for democratic citizenship transcends 'localism' or a mere affinity to a nation state; it requires active community engagement.

  • Citizenship education is viewed both as a craft (it is 'caught' through experience and participation) and as a programme (it is 'taught' through formal curriculum).

  • Ideally, citizenship education should prepare learners to act at a local, national, and global scale, guided by cosmopolitan ideals.

Ancient and Modern Concepts of Citizenship

  • The concept of citizenship originated in the ancient Greek city-state of Athens.

  • Athenian democracy defined citizenship through three essential and complementary dimensions:

    • Status: The relationship of the individual to the state.

    • Feeling: A sense of belonging to a community of citizens.

    • Practice: Active participation in public affairs or the life of the community.

Pericles' Perspective on Athenian Democracy
  • Pericles, governor of Athens (450–429 BC), described the Athenian constitution as a democracy because power was in the hands of the whole people rather than a minority.

  • Key attributes of this democratic citizenship included:

    • Keeping to the law in public affairs out of deep respect.

    • Reciprocal linking of personal and public dimensions; individuals remain interested in state affairs even while occupied with private business.

    • The expectation that every man takes an interest in politics; those who do not are seen as having 'no business' in the city.

  • Pericles' affirmation suggests that active participation in democracy is inherently educational and that citizens possess 'human agency' (the capacity to think, act independently, and make choices).

Hierarchy of Athenian Citizenship
  • Despite its democratic ideals, Athenian citizenship was hierarchical and exclusive:

    • Citizens: Limited to free, adult Greek males over the age of thirty.

    • Non-citizens: Included women, children, slaves, and foreigners.

  • Institutional roles included:

    • The Assembly: A body of all male citizens older than eighteen that ruled on foreign policy, made laws, and tried political crimes.

    • The Council of Five Hundred: An administrative body that prepared the agenda for the assembly and oversaw daily business.

    • Law Courts: Bodies that prepared legislation for consideration by the assembly.

Modern Interpretations of Citizenship
  • T.H. Marshall (1950) categorized citizenship into three elements that were historically blended but became distinct in modern societies:

    • Civil Rights: Necessary for individual freedom, such as freedom of speech, property rights, and the right to a fair trial.

    • Political Rights: The right to participate in the exercise of political power as an elector or as a member of a body invested with political authority.

    • Social Rights: The right to a modicum of economic welfare and security, and the right to share in the social heritage and live the life of a civilized being according to the standards prevailing in society.

  • McLaughlin’s Continuum (1992):

    • Minimal Interpretation: Citizenship as 'thin,' private, and passive. Political involvement is limited primarily to voting for representatives.

    • Maximal Interpretation: Citizenship as 'thick,' public, and active. It emphasizes direct democracy, broad participation, and the degree of 'citizen power' that allows control over political issues.

  • Civic Agency (Boyte, 2008):

    • Defined as the navigational capacity to negotiate and transform a fluid and open world.

    • Dimensions: Promoting individual freedom (empowerment) and building social cohesion (collective action for the general good).

    • Contrast: Bottom-up development (people as agents) vs. top-down development (people as 'helped' or 'saved').

History of South African Citizenship (1910–1996)

Phase 1: Colonial Citizenship
  • Rooted in English law and the concept of 'allegiance.' Prior to 1910, residents were British subjects.

  • 1910: Formation of the South African Union; residents were British subjects and Union nationals.

  • Natives Land Act (Act No. 26 of 1913): Set up reserves (homelands) for Black people, marking the start of disparate citizenship.

  • Natives Urban Areas Act (Act No. 20 of 1923): Separated native locations from towns, segregating Black and White people socially and administratively.

  • Union Nationality and Flags Act (Act No. 40 of 1927): Further defined the status of nationals within the Union.

Phase 2: Apartheid Citizenship
  • South African Citizenship Act (Act No. 44 of 1949): Created the status of 'South African citizen,' substituting it for Union nationality. It aimed to free the country from colonial confines but ushered in a 'common albeit unequal' society.

  • Population Registration Act (Act No. 30 of 1950): Classified the population into four race groups: Europeans (Whites), Coloureds, Indians, and Africans (Blacks).

  • Promotion of Bantu Self-Government Act (Act No. 45 of 1959): Established ten independent or autonomous Black states.

    • Four 'Independent' States (TBVC): Transkei, Bophuthatswana, Venda, and Ciskei.

    • Six 'Self-governing' States: Lebowa, QwaQwa, KwaZulu, Gazankulu, Kangwane, and Kwandebele.

  • Bantu Homelands Citizenship Act (Act No. 26 of 1970): Enforced the division of Africans along ethnic lines. Africans were considered citizens of their respective ethnic reserves/homelands and denied civic, political, or social rights in the 'White' Republic of South Africa.

Phase 3: Restorative Citizenship
  • The anti-apartheid struggle fostered maximalist democratic ideals, exemplified by the Freedom Charter (1955).

    • The Freedom Charter declared: 'South Africa belongs to all who live in it, black and white… only a democratic state, based on the will of the people, can secure to all their birthright.'

  • Restoration of South African Citizenship Act (Act No. 73 of 1986): Granted South African citizenship to certain citizens of the TBVC states effective January 1, 1994.

  • Restoration and Extension of South African Citizenship Act (Act No. 196 of 1993): A significant step toward common citizenship.

  • Interim Constitution (1993): Provided for a common South African citizenship where every citizen is entitled to all rights, privileges, benefits, duties, and responsibilities.

Phase 4: Common Citizenship
  • South African Citizenship Act (Act No. 88 of 1995): Formally repealed homeland citizenship laws and created a unified citizenship regime.

  • Constitution of the Republic of South Africa (Act No. 108 of 1996): Emphasized a single, non-racial, and democratic form of citizenship based on the norm of equality.

International Trends in Citizenship Education

The European Union and the United Kingdom
  • The movement for citizenship education in Europe intensified in the late 1990s:

    • 1997: Council of Europe declared Education for Democratic Citizenship a main priority.

    • 2005: Declared the European Year of Citizenship through Education.

  • Motivations include globalization, immigration, communication technology, and individualization, which challenge traditional value transfer.

  • United Kingdom (English National Curriculum):

    • Statutory (compulsory) subject since 1999 following the 1998 Crick Report.

    • 'Soft' learning (curriculum-based) vs. 'Hard' learning (learning by doing/community involvement).

    • Three Strands of the Crick Report:

      1. Social and Moral Responsibility: Learning self-confidence and responsible behavior toward authority and peers.

      2. Community Involvement: Learning through service and involvement in community concerns.

      3. Political Literacy: Gaining knowledge, skills, and values to be effective in public life.

    • Key Stages: Non-statutory guidelines for ages 5–11 (Stages 1 and 2); statutory responsibilities for ages 11–16 (Stages 3 and 4).

United States of America
  • No official national curriculum; education is autonomous across 50 states. Terms used include 'social studies' or 'civic education.'

  • Center for Civic Education (founded 1987) published 'CIVITAS: A Framework for Civic Education' (1991) and 'National Standards for Civics and Government' (1994).

  • Three Goals of CIVITAS:

    1. Civic Virtue: Instilling habits and principles for responsible citizenship.

    2. Civic Participation: Developing skills to monitor, formulate, and implement public policy and volunteer in communities.

    3. Civic Knowledge and Intellectual Skills: Empowering citizens to influence public policy through knowledge.

  • Skill Categories:

    • Intellectual Skills: Identify, describe, explain, evaluate, and defend a position.

    • Participatory Skills: Influencing policy, building coalitions, negotiating, compromising, and managing conflict.

Citizenship Education in Post-Apartheid South Africa

  • Constitution (1996) defines a child as a person under 18; children are equally entitled to rights and subject to responsibilities.

  • Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement (CAPS, 2012): Aims to equip learners for meaningful participation as citizens of a free country.

    • Social Sciences (History/Geography): Supports democracy by explaining constitutional values, promoting human rights, and preparing for global responsibility.

    • Life Orientation: Teaches democracy and human rights to develop responsible citizens.

  • Manifesto on Values, Education and Democracy (2001): Outlines ten fundamental values and sixteen strategies (e.g., nurturing 'new patriotism' through symbols, anthems, and flags).

  • Bill of Responsibilities (2008): Developed by the National Religious Leaders’ Forum (NRLF) and the Department of Education.

    • Aims to nurture a culture of giving, care, and responsibility.

    • Connects rights (e.g., to education, property, citizenship) with specific duties (e.g., obeying laws, contributing to the country).

Future Directions and Theoretical Challenges

Competitive Elitism vs. Participatory Democracy
  • Joseph Schumpeter viewed democracy as a method where competing individuals/teams acquire power to decide, rather than an ideal of broad public participation.

  • This 'Competitive Elitism' is reflected in the Representative Councils of Learners (RCLs) established by the South African Schools Act (1996) for Grade 8 and higher.

    • RCLs are often seen as 'prestigious' and 'elite' bodies.

    • Critics argue the competitive race for leadership silences less assertive learners and undermines the participatory traditions of the anti-apartheid Student Representative Councils (SRCs).

Patriotism vs. Cosmopolitanism
  • Patriotism: Pride and identification with one's nation. Brighouse (2008) identifies four reasons for it: Obligation (compatriots first), Solidarity (sacrifice for just distribution), Citizenship (easier trait development), and Flourishing (sense of connection).

  • Cosmopolitanism: A philosophy developed during the Enlightenment (notably by Immanuel Kant) referring to the 'community of human beings.'

    • Focuses on moral and political ties that bind citizens to the whole world.

    • Based on 'demos' (people) rather than 'ethnos' (ethnic group/nation).

    • Encourages thinking globally and acting locally.

  • Characteristics of Cosmopolitan Citizenship Education:

    • Recognition of diversity and global awareness.

    • Commitment to human rights as a 'common standard of achievement for all members of the human family' (UN Declaration of Human Rights, 1948).

    • Enabling learners to connect their immediate contexts with the global context.

  • Tension in South African Policy: Current documents like the Bill of Responsibilities vacillate between national allegiance (patriotic) and universal humanity/democratic universalism (cosmopolitan).