Questions regarding the relationship between morality and law:
Can something be moral yet illegal?
Can something be legal yet immoral?
Describes societal beliefs about right or wrong.
Context-specific; varies across societies.
Measured by surveys.
Prescriptive nature: defines what is right or wrong.
Universal applicability across cultures.
Derives from rational reasoning.
Critical for assessing positive morality.
Exploring the praiseworthiness or blameworthiness of:
Character
Act
Consequences
Central to Critical Morality/Ethics.
Virtue Ethics
Focuses on the moral worth derived from the character of the person performing the act.
Deontology
Moral worth is associated with the act itself, regardless of the outcome.
Consequentialism
Moral worth is derived from the consequences of the act.
Aristotelian view: An action is right if it aligns with what a virtuous person would do.
Kantian perspective: An action is right if it is performed out of a sense of duty.
Ethical Egoism: Right actions promote the agent's self-interest.
Utilitarianism: Right actions maximize happiness for all affected.
Distinction between Normative and Analytical Approaches:
Normative: Evaluation and justification of laws.
Analytical: Explanation of legal concepts.
A woman reported her husband for anti-Nazi comments, leading to his execution.
Charged with illegal deprivation of liberty.
Defense based on Nazi statute legality.
Court ruled against her based on critical morality's standards.
Principles discovered through reason are fundamental moral standards (e.g., equality).
Objective, akin to physical laws.
Varied explanations of natural law:
God, human reasoning, human nature, societal needs.
Law as a social and moral phenomenon.
Valid laws stem from universal moral principles.
Importance of critical morality for legal legitimacy.
'Ethics' originates from the Greek ethos: character.
Character reflects an individual's stable motivational structure.
Acts derive ethical value from the agent's character.
Goodness in actions correlates with virtuous motivations.
Aristotle pioneered the theory prioritizing ethical responsibility.
Analysis of societal behaviors defines good and bad lives.
Key questions:
Who do we aspire to be like?
What traits do we admire?
Recognized as the highest human good, desired for its own merit.
Translated variously as happiness, but emphasizes objective fulfillment.
Eudaimonia associated with human flourishing, rationality, and societal engagement.
Intellectual and moral virtues lead to good actions.
Virtue defined as excellence.
Moral virtue is about finding balance between extremes.
Notable examples include:
Courage between cowardice and recklessness.
Generosity balanced between prodigality and stinginess.
Moral virtue requires practice, action, and emotional regulation.
Importance of practical wisdom in recognizing appropriate behaviors.
Justice arises from social cooperation and establishes moral law.
Common Good: Central to human flourishing, grounded in reason.
Universal Moral Principles: Expected conduct derived from practical reasoning.
Law defined as rational ordinance for the common good, rooted in natural law.
Real laws vs. Defective laws:
Real laws align with reason and promote the common good.
Defective laws diverge from reason or impose unfair burdens.
Legal positivism views law without accounting for morality's role:
Asserts a distinction between law as it is and law as it ought to be.
Judges utilize principles (not merely rules) to anchor their decisions.
Importance of moral principles in judicial discretion and interpretations.
Natural Law_merged
Questions regarding the relationship between morality and law:
Can something be moral yet illegal?
Can something be legal yet immoral?
Describes societal beliefs about right or wrong.
Context-specific; varies across societies.
Measured by surveys.
Prescriptive nature: defines what is right or wrong.
Universal applicability across cultures.
Derives from rational reasoning.
Critical for assessing positive morality.
Exploring the praiseworthiness or blameworthiness of:
Character
Act
Consequences
Central to Critical Morality/Ethics.
Virtue Ethics
Focuses on the moral worth derived from the character of the person performing the act.
Deontology
Moral worth is associated with the act itself, regardless of the outcome.
Consequentialism
Moral worth is derived from the consequences of the act.
Aristotelian view: An action is right if it aligns with what a virtuous person would do.
Kantian perspective: An action is right if it is performed out of a sense of duty.
Ethical Egoism: Right actions promote the agent's self-interest.
Utilitarianism: Right actions maximize happiness for all affected.
Distinction between Normative and Analytical Approaches:
Normative: Evaluation and justification of laws.
Analytical: Explanation of legal concepts.
A woman reported her husband for anti-Nazi comments, leading to his execution.
Charged with illegal deprivation of liberty.
Defense based on Nazi statute legality.
Court ruled against her based on critical morality's standards.
Principles discovered through reason are fundamental moral standards (e.g., equality).
Objective, akin to physical laws.
Varied explanations of natural law:
God, human reasoning, human nature, societal needs.
Law as a social and moral phenomenon.
Valid laws stem from universal moral principles.
Importance of critical morality for legal legitimacy.
'Ethics' originates from the Greek ethos: character.
Character reflects an individual's stable motivational structure.
Acts derive ethical value from the agent's character.
Goodness in actions correlates with virtuous motivations.
Aristotle pioneered the theory prioritizing ethical responsibility.
Analysis of societal behaviors defines good and bad lives.
Key questions:
Who do we aspire to be like?
What traits do we admire?
Recognized as the highest human good, desired for its own merit.
Translated variously as happiness, but emphasizes objective fulfillment.
Eudaimonia associated with human flourishing, rationality, and societal engagement.
Intellectual and moral virtues lead to good actions.
Virtue defined as excellence.
Moral virtue is about finding balance between extremes.
Notable examples include:
Courage between cowardice and recklessness.
Generosity balanced between prodigality and stinginess.
Moral virtue requires practice, action, and emotional regulation.
Importance of practical wisdom in recognizing appropriate behaviors.
Justice arises from social cooperation and establishes moral law.
Common Good: Central to human flourishing, grounded in reason.
Universal Moral Principles: Expected conduct derived from practical reasoning.
Law defined as rational ordinance for the common good, rooted in natural law.
Real laws vs. Defective laws:
Real laws align with reason and promote the common good.
Defective laws diverge from reason or impose unfair burdens.
Legal positivism views law without accounting for morality's role:
Asserts a distinction between law as it is and law as it ought to be.
Judges utilize principles (not merely rules) to anchor their decisions.
Importance of moral principles in judicial discretion and interpretations.