Elites (urban merchants and large landholders) maintained control over local economies post-independence, profiting from European trade and investment.
This dynamic disincentivized economic diversification, reinforcing dependency on foreign markets.
Latin America experienced more damaging effects from foreign investment compared to the U.S. or Canada, leading to structural economic vulnerabilities.
British Investment:
Limited foreign influence arose from small market size; manifested as informal imperialism rather than transforming states into dependent partners.
British investors focused on profitable sectors such as cattle and sheep ranching in Argentina.
Innovations like refrigerated cargo ships in the 1860s facilitated the export of meat, predominantly controlled by British investors.
Urban areas, specifically Buenos Aires, grew rapidly due to European migrant labor, with a 1914 population exceeding 3.5 million.
General Porfirio Díaz's Rule (1876-1911):
This period supported large landowners, merchants, and foreign investor interests, primarily benefiting a small elite.
Infrastructure expansion included railroads and telegraphs, alongside increased mineral resource production.
Despite industrial advancements in steel, glass, and textiles, the working class saw minimal economic gains, with profits funneled to elites.
By the early 20th century, declining living conditions among average Mexicans contributed to revolutionary fervor in 1910.
Latin American economies witnessed rapid expansion from the late 19th century, with key exports including copper, bananas, coffee, rubber, beef, wheat, and tobacco.
Global competition and foreign control resulted in local economies being subject to external decision-making, impacting price stability and sovereignty.
Walt Whitman's Reflection:
The quote underscores the vast diversity of societies in the Americas, highlighting the contrasts among various ethnic groups.
Struggles for Recognition:
Ethnic, racial, and gender divisions fueled conflicts, resisting the Enlightenment ideals of freedom and equality.
Dominant political forces often suppressed demands from marginalized groups, undermining their societal contributions.
Multicultural Society:
By the late 19th century, the U.S. comprised diverse groups, including indigenous peoples, Euro-American settlers, African Americans, and migrants from Europe and Asia.
Power Structures:
Political and economic power predominantly resided with white male elites, leading to tensions with increasingly diverse constituencies seeking equality.
Territorial expansion resulted in the displacement of Native Americans onto reservations, undermining their autonomy through federal policies.
The Dawes Severalty Act (1887):
Aimed at assimilating Native Americans into white culture by abolishing communal landholding practices.
Native culture was further eroded by the forced enrollment of children in boarding schools, which sought to eliminate tribal influences.
Efforts for equality included Reconstruction policies, facing significant resistance and subsequent withdrawal in the 1870s.
Freed slaves encountered barriers to land ownership, often relegated to sharecropping, facing systemic violence and segregation that restricted upward mobility.
Early Women's Movement:
This movement gained momentum at the Seneca Falls Convention in 1848, demanding equal rights and voting rights.
Despite some advancements in education, women faced significant limitations on political power until the 20th century.
Mass Migration (1840-1914):
Approximately 25 million European immigrants introduced diverse cultural elements into the U.S., frequently subjected to hostility and segregation in urban neighborhoods.
Ethnic and Cultural Diversity:
The dominance of British and French settlers obscured rich cultural diversity, particularly the significant indigenous populations.
Louis Riel and Métis Rights:
Riel emerged as a leader of resistance movements advocating for Métis and indigenous rights against expanding British Canadian authority.
Unique Vocabulary Terms:
Informal Imperialism: A form of indirect control where a country exerts influence over another nation without direct political or military domination.
Sharecropping: A system where farmers work land owned by someone else in exchange for a share of the crops produced, often leading to cycles of debt and poverty.